Multistability and Perceptual Inference

Ambiguous images present a challenge to the visual system: How can uncertainty about the causes of visual inputs be represented when there are multiple equally plausible causes? A Bayesian ideal observer should represent uncertainty in the form of a posterior probability distribution over causes. However, in many real-world situations, computing this distribution is intractable and requires some form of approximation. We argue that the visual system approximates the posterior over underlying causes with a set of samples and that this approximation strategy produces perceptual multistability—stochastic alternation between percepts in consciousness. Under our analysis, multistability arises from a dynamic sample-generating process that explores the posterior through stochastic diffusion, implementing a rational form of approximate Bayesian inference known as Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). We examine in detail the most extensively studied form of multistability, binocular rivalry, showing how a variety of experimental phenomena—gamma-like stochastic switching, patchy percepts, fusion, and traveling waves—can be understood in terms of MCMC sampling over simple graphical models of the underlying perceptual tasks. We conjecture that the stochastic nature of spiking neurons may lend itself to implementing sample-based posterior approximations in the brain.

[1]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[2]  Julian N. Marewski,et al.  Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society , 2009 .

[3]  R. Blake,et al.  Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Fox,et al.  Detection of motion during binocular rivalry suppression. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[5]  H. J. Gamble Trends in Neurosciences , 1980 .

[6]  H. Damasio,et al.  IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence: Special Issue on Perceptual Organization in Computer Vision , 1998 .

[7]  R. Blake,et al.  Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry , 1999, Vision Research.

[8]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[9]  C. Tyler,et al.  Failure of rivalry at low contrast: Evidence of a suprathreshold binocular summation process , 1992, Vision Research.

[10]  R. Blake © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 5 A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies , 2000 .

[11]  M. Hollins,et al.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Aaron C. Courville,et al.  The pigeon as particle filter , 2007, NIPS 2007.

[13]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Topography of contextual modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[15]  G. Miller,et al.  Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.

[16]  Yichuan Zhang,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 , 2012 .

[17]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Theory Acquisition as Stochastic Search , 2010 .

[18]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Stochastic variations in sensory awareness are driven by noisy neuronal adaptation: evidence from serial correlations in perceptual bistability , 2009 .

[19]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Neural Implementation of Hierarchical Bayesian Inference by Importance Sampling , 2009, NIPS.

[20]  D. McNamara,et al.  Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society , 2007 .

[21]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[22]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Modeling the effects of memory on human online sentence processing with particle filters , 2008, NIPS.

[23]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[24]  Journal of the Optical Society of America , 1950, Nature.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Real world occlusion constraints and binocular rivalry , 1990, Vision Research.

[26]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Interpreting Neural Response Variability as Monte Carlo Sampling of the Posterior , 2002, NIPS.

[27]  M. Lankheet,et al.  Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[28]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition , 2006, Psychological science.

[29]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[30]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[31]  N. Epley,et al.  The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic , 2006, Psychological science.

[32]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Theory and Dynamics of Perceptual Bistability , 2007 .

[33]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .

[34]  E. Kandel,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Annual subject and author indexes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A Learning Algorithm for Boltzmann Machines , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  A. Sanders Attention and performance III : proceedings of a symposium on attention and performance, held in Soesterberg August 4-8,1969, under the auspices of the Institute for Perception RVO-TNO, Soesterberg, the Netherlands , 1970 .

[37]  R. P. O'Shea Chronometric analysis supports fusion rather than suppression theory of binocular vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[38]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Sensitivity Underlying Changes in Visual Consciousness , 2010, Current Biology.

[39]  A. Yuille,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? , 2022 .

[40]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods (Springer Texts in Statistics) , 2005 .

[41]  Tai Sing Lee,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  Bialek,et al.  Random switching and optimal processing in the perception of ambiguous signals. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[43]  Robert P. O'Shea,et al.  The effect of spatial frequency and field size on the spread of exclusive visibility in binocular rivalry , 1997, Vision Research.

[44]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  How Optimal Depth Cue Integration Depends on the Task , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[45]  October I Physical Review Letters , 2022 .

[46]  T Miike,et al.  [Brain and mind]. , 1996, No to hattatsu = Brain and development.

[47]  P Wenderoth,et al.  Determinants of Fusion of Dichoptically Presented Orthogonal Gratings , 1999, Perception.

[48]  R. Sundareswara,et al.  Perceptual multistability predicted by search model for Bayesian decisions. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[49]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[50]  R. van Ee,et al.  Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[51]  John J. Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities , 1999 .

[52]  N. Logothetis,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry , 1996 .

[53]  J. Hirsch,et al.  A Neural Representation of Categorization Uncertainty in the Human Brain , 2006, Neuron.

[54]  P. Berkes,et al.  Statistically Optimal Perception and Learning: from Behavior to Neural Representations , 2022 .

[55]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[56]  R. K. Simpson Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[57]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  W. Richards,et al.  Perception as Bayesian Inference , 2008 .

[59]  H. Kalmus Biological Cybernetics , 1972, Nature.

[60]  Nicole C. Rust,et al.  Do We Know What the Early Visual System Does? , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[62]  R. Fox,et al.  Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression , 1970 .

[63]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[64]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  One and Done? Optimal Decisions From Very Few Samples , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[65]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[66]  D H Brainard,et al.  Bayesian color constancy. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[67]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[69]  J. Gold,et al.  Banburismus and the Brain Decoding the Relationship between Sensory Stimuli, Decisions, and Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[70]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[71]  Adam N Sanborn,et al.  Rational approximations to rational models: alternative algorithms for category learning. , 2010, Psychological review.

[72]  C. Ellis Visual Neuroscience , 1987 .

[73]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[74]  鈴木 増雄 Time-Dependent Statistics of the Ising Model , 1965 .

[75]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Modeling brain function: the world of attractor neural networks, 1st Edition , 1989 .

[76]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Hierarchical Model of Binocular Rivalry , 1998, Neural Computation.

[77]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques , 2009 .

[78]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[79]  H E M Journal of Neurophysiology , 1938, Nature.

[80]  M. V. Rossum,et al.  In Neural Computation , 2022 .

[81]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[82]  Paul R. Schrater,et al.  Theory and Dynamics of Perceptual Bistability , 2006, NIPS.

[83]  Miao‐kun Sun Trends in cognitive sciences , 2012 .

[84]  R. Blake,et al.  A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[85]  A. Tellegen,et al.  in Psychological Science , 1996 .

[86]  Alan W Freeman,et al.  Multistage model for binocular rivalry. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[87]  Carson C. Chow,et al.  A Spiking Neuron Model for Binocular Rivalry , 2000 .

[88]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  A tutorial on stochastic approximation algorithms for training Restricted Boltzmann Machines and Deep Belief Nets , 2010, 2010 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA).

[89]  H. Fukuda Magnitude of Suppression of Binocular Rivalry within the Invisible Pattern , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.

[90]  Min-Suk Kang Size matters: a study of binocular rivalry dynamics. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[91]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A more rational model of categorization , 2006 .

[92]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Distance in feature space determines exclusivity in visual rivalry , 2007, Vision Research.

[93]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review , 2008, Cognition.

[94]  Hugh R Wilson,et al.  Minimal physiological conditions for binocular rivalry and rivalry memory , 2007, Vision Research.

[95]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[96]  Amos Storkey,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 , 2007 .

[97]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[98]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2005 .

[99]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[100]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex , 2009, Science.

[101]  R. Blake,et al.  What is Suppressed during Binocular Rivalry? , 1980, Perception.