Emergency Connectivity in Ad-hoc Networks with Selfish Nodes

Inspired by the CONFIDANT protocol (Buchegger and Boudec in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing, pp. 226–236, 2002), we define and study a basic reputation-based protocol in multihop wireless networks with selfish nodes. Its reputation mechanism is implemented through the ability of any node to define a threshold of tolerance for any of its neighbors, and to cut the connection to any of these neighbors that refuse to forward an amount of flow above that threshold. The main question we would like to address is whether one can set the initial conditions so that the system reaches an equilibrium state where a non-zero amount of every commodity is routed. This is important in emergency situations, where all nodes need to be able to communicate even with a small bandwidth. Following a standard approach, we model this protocol as a game, and we give necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of non-trivial Nash equilibria. Then we enhance these conditions with extra conditions that give a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of connected Nash equilibria. We note that it is not always necessary for all the flow originating at a node to reach its destination at equilibrium. For example, a node may be using unsuccessful flow in order to effect changes in a distant part of the network that will prove quite beneficial to it. We show that we can decide in polynomial time whether there exists a (connected) equilibrium without unsuccessful flows. In that case we calculate (in polynomial time) initial values that impose such an equilibrium on the network. On the negative side, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether a connected equilibrium exists in general (i.e., with some nodes using unsuccessful flows at equilibrium).

[1]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  On designing incentive-compatible routing and forwarding protocols in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2006, Wirel. Networks.

[2]  Vikram Srinivasan,et al.  Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[3]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[4]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  Sprite: a simple, cheat-proof, credit-based system for mobile ad-hoc networks , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[5]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[6]  Levente Buttyán,et al.  Stimulating Cooperation in Self-Organizing Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2003, Mob. Networks Appl..

[7]  Ratul Mahajan,et al.  Sustaining cooperation in multi-hop wireless networks , 2005, NSDI.

[8]  L. Lovász,et al.  Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization , 1981 .

[9]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol , 2002, MobiHoc '02.

[10]  Qi He,et al.  A secure incentive architecture for ad hoc networks: Research Articles , 2006 .

[11]  Qi He,et al.  SORI: a secure and objective reputation-based incentive scheme for ad-hoc networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[12]  Paolo Santi,et al.  The COMMIT Protocol for Truthful and Cost-Efficient Routing in Ad Hoc Networks with Selfish Nodes , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Qi He,et al.  A secure incentive architecture for ad hoc networks , 2006, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[14]  Paolo Santi,et al.  COMMIT: a sender-centric truthful and energy-efficient routing protocol for ad hoc networks with selfish nodes , 2005, 19th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium.

[15]  R. Srikant,et al.  Achieving cooperation in multihop wireless networks of selfish nodes , 2006, GameNets '06.