Three-dimensional modeling of angiogenesis in porous biomaterial scaffolds.

Vascularization of biomaterial scaffolds is essential for the successful clinical application of engineered tissues. Experimental studies are often performed to investigate the role of scaffold architecture on vascularized tissue formation. However, experiments are expensive and time-consuming and synthesis protocols often do not allow for independent investigation of specific scaffold properties. Computational models allow for rapid screening of potential material designs with control over scaffold properties that is difficult in laboratory settings. We have developed and tested a three-dimensional agent-based framework for investigating the effect of scaffold pore architecture on angiogenesis. Software agents represent endothelial cells, interacting together and with their micro-environment, leading to the invasion of blood vessels into the scaffold. A rule base, driven by experimental findings, governs the behavior of individual agents. 3D scaffold models with well-defined homogeneous and heterogeneous pore architectures were simulated to investigate the impact of various design parameters. Simulation results indicate that pores of larger size with higher interconnectivity and porosity support rapid and extensive angiogenesis. The developed framework can be used to screen biomaterial scaffold designs for optimal vascularization and investigate complex interactions among invading blood vessels and their micro-environment.

[1]  S. McDougall,et al.  Mathematical modeling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. , 2006, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[2]  Ali Cinar,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for Biomedical Simulation: Modeling Vascularization of Porous Scaffolds , 2011, PRIMA.

[3]  Chad Johnson,et al.  The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[4]  Aleksander S Popel,et al.  Module-based multiscale simulation of angiogenesis in skeletal muscle , 2011, Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling.

[5]  E. Brey,et al.  Endothelial Cell–Matrix Interactions in Neovascularization , 2008 .

[6]  P. D. de Oliveira,et al.  Pore size regulates cell and tissue interactions with PLGA–CaP scaffolds used for bone engineering , 2012, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[7]  F. M. Gabhann,et al.  Integration of experimental and computational approaches to sprouting angiogenesis , 2012, Current opinion in hematology.

[8]  Jun Wang,et al.  The correlation between the internal structure and vascularization of controllable porous bioceramic materials in vivo: a quantitative study. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[9]  Shiwei Zhou,et al.  Microstructure design of biodegradable scaffold and its effect on tissue regeneration. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[10]  J. Folkman,et al.  Migration and proliferation of endothelial cells in preformed and newly formed blood vessels during tumor angiogenesis. , 1977, Microvascular research.

[11]  Huipin Yuan,et al.  Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[12]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Cell Growth and Size Homeostasis in Proliferating Animal Cells , 2009, Science.

[13]  D. Ingber,et al.  Prevascularization of porous biodegradable polymers , 1993, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[14]  Ali Cinar,et al.  An agent-based model for the investigation of neovascularization within porous scaffolds. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[15]  K Zygourakis,et al.  Endothelial cell migration on surfaces modified with immobilized adhesive peptides. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[16]  P. Polverini Angiogenesis in health and disease: insights into basic mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. , 2002, Journal of dental education.

[17]  T. Skalak,et al.  The FASEB Journal express article 10.1096/fj.03-0933fje. Published online February 6, 2004. Multicellular simulation predicts microvascular patterning and in silico tissue assembly , 2022 .

[18]  Michael J. North,et al.  Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit , 2006, TOMC.

[19]  W. Saltzman Tissue Engineering: Engineering Principles for the Design of Replacement Organs and Tissues , 2004 .

[20]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young's modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[21]  Chaozong Liu,et al.  Design and Development of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering , 2007 .

[22]  E. Brey,et al.  Generation of porous poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels by salt leaching. , 2010, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[23]  Hanchuan Peng,et al.  V3D enables real-time 3D visualization and quantitative analysis of large-scale biological image data sets , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[24]  Sara Checa,et al.  Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[25]  J. West,et al.  Vascularization of engineered tissues: approaches to promote angio-genesis in biomaterials. , 2008, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[26]  D. Kaplan,et al.  Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[27]  W. Risau,et al.  Mechanisms of angiogenesis , 1997, Nature.

[28]  Seung‐Woo Cho,et al.  Three-dimensional cell grafting enhances the angiogenic efficacy of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. , 2012, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[29]  B. Lévy,et al.  Mechanisms of angiogenesis and remodelling of the microvasculature. , 2008, Cardiovascular research.

[30]  Aleksander S. Popel,et al.  Elongation, proliferation & migration differentiate endothelial cell phenotypes and determine capillary sprouting , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[31]  Attila Kuba,et al.  A Parallel 3D 12-Subiteration Thinning Algorithm , 1999, Graph. Model. Image Process..

[32]  Ming-Huei Cheng,et al.  The role of pore size on vascularization and tissue remodeling in PEG hydrogels. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[33]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[34]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  The correlation of pore morphology, interconnectivity and physical properties of 3D ceramic scaffolds with bone ingrowth. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[35]  Julian R Jones,et al.  Quantifying the 3D macrostructure of tissue scaffolds , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[36]  Holger Gerhardt,et al.  Agent-based simulation of notch-mediated tip cell selection in angiogenic sprout initialisation. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  Shayn M. Peirce,et al.  Multi-cell Agent-based Simulation of the Microvasculature to Study the Dynamics of Circulating Inflammatory Cell Trafficking , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  S. Hollister,et al.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[39]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[40]  Sara Checa,et al.  Effect of cell seeding and mechanical loading on vascularization and tissue formation inside a scaffold: a mechano-biological model using a lattice approach to simulate cell activity. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[41]  C. Patrick,et al.  Three-Dimensional, Quantitative Analysis of Desmin and Smooth Muscle Alpha Actin Expression During Angiogenesis , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.