Renewal of an old European Pharmacopoeia method for Terazosin using modeling with mass spectrometric peak tracking

&NA; An older method for terazosin was reworked in order to reduce the analysis time from 90 min (2 × 45 min) to below 5 min. The method in European Pharmacopoeia (Ph.Eur.) investigates the specified impurities separately. The reason of the different methods is that the retention of two impurities is not adequate in reversed phase, not even with 100% water. Therefore ion‐pair‐chromatography has to be applied and since that two impurities absorb at low UV‐wavelength they had to be analyzed by different method than the other specified impurities. In our new method we could improve the retention with pH elevation using a new type of stationary phases available for high pH applications. Also a detection wavelength could be selected that is appropriate for the detection and quantification of all impurities. The method development is the bottleneck of liquid chromatography even today, when more and more fast chromatographic systems are used. Expert knowledge with intelligent programs is available to reduce the time of method development and offer extra information about the robustness of the separation. Design of Experiments (DoE) for simultaneous optimization of gradient time (tG), temperature (T) and ternary eluent composition (tC) requires 12 experiments. A good alternative way to identify a certain peak in different chromatograms is the molecular mass of the compound, due to its high specificity. Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS) is now a routine technique and increasingly available in laboratories. In our experiment for the resolution‐ and retention modeling the DryLab4 method development software (Version 4.2) was used. In recent versions of the software the use of (m/z)‐MS‐data is possible along the UV‐peak‐area‐tracking technology. The modelled and measured chromatograms showed excellent correlations. The average retention time deviations were ca. 0.5 s and there was no difference between the predicted and measured Rs,crit −values. Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available. HighlightsWe developed UHPLC method for Terazosin related substances by DryLab software using mass spectrometry supported peak tracking.The predicted retention times and resolution of critical peak pair were in good agreement with the experimental ones.We reduce the analysis time of Terazosin Ph. Eur. related substances HPLC method from 90 min (2 × 45 min) to below 5 min.

[1]  J. Fekete,et al.  Establishing column batch repeatability according to Quality by Design (QbD) principles using modeling software. , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[2]  John W. Dolan,et al.  Introduction to modern liquid chromatography , 1974 .

[3]  J. W. Dolan,et al.  Software for chromatographic method development , 1991 .

[4]  I. Molnár,et al.  Retention modelling in ternary solvent-strength gradient elution reversed-phase chromatography using 30 mm columns. , 2006, Journal of Chromatography A.

[5]  I. Molnár,et al.  Fas development of a robust high-performance liquid chromatographic method for Ginkgo biloba based on computer simulation , 1991 .

[6]  Davy Guillarme,et al.  Reliability of simulated robustness testing in fast liquid chromatography, using state-of-the-art column technology, instrumentation and modelling software , 2014 .

[7]  L. Snyder,et al.  Computer simulation as a tool for the rapid optimization of the high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of a tryptic digest of human growth hormone. , 1992, Journal of chromatography.

[8]  L. Snyder,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatographic computer simulation based on a restricted multi-parameter approach : I. Theory and verification , 1990 .

[9]  D. Guillarme,et al.  Method development for the separation of monoclonal antibody charge variants in cation exchange chromatography, Part I: salt gradient approach. , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[10]  J. Rauha,et al.  Computer assisted scale up from analytical HPLC to preparative MPLC for the separation of phenolic compounds , 2001 .

[11]  I. Molnár,et al.  Expanding the term "Design Space" in high performance liquid chromatography (I). , 2011, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[12]  L. Snyder Changing reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography selectivity. Which variables should be tried first? , 1997, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[13]  R. Lobrutto,et al.  Strategy for Improving HPLC Retention Time Prediction Accuracy Using Chromatography Simulation Software , 2010 .

[14]  V. Erdmann,et al.  High-performance-liquid chromatography ofThermus aquaticus 50S and 30S ribosomal proteins , 1989 .

[15]  I. Molnár,et al.  Aspects of the "Design Space" in high pressure liquid chromatography method development. , 2010, Journal of chromatography. A.

[16]  L. Wrisley Use of computer simulations in the development of gradient and isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography methods for analysis of drug compounds and synthetic intermediates , 1993 .

[17]  van Ma Marion Straten,et al.  Computer-assisted optimization of reversed-phase HPLC isocratic separations of neutral compounds , 2001 .

[18]  Imre Molnár,et al.  In silico robustness testing of a compendial HPLC purity method by using of a multidimensional design space build by chromatography modeling-Case study pramipexole. , 2014, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[19]  I. Molnár,et al.  Using an innovative Quality-by-Design approach for development of a stability indicating UHPLC method for ebastine in the API and pharmaceutical formulations. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[20]  D. Guillarme,et al.  Practical method development for the separation of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug-conjugate species in hydrophobic interaction chromatography, part 1: optimization of the mobile phase. , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[21]  Róbert Kormány,et al.  Exploring better column selectivity choices in ultra-high performance liquid chromatography using quality by design principles. , 2013, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[22]  J. Fekete,et al.  Rapid high performance liquid chromatography method development with high prediction accuracy, using 5cm long narrow bore columns packed with sub-2microm particles and Design Space computer modeling. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[23]  Alexander H. Schmidt,et al.  Computer-assisted optimization in the development of a high-performance liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of kava pyrones in Piper methysticum preparations. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[24]  J. Dolan,et al.  Variability of column selectivity for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography compensation by adjustment of separation conditions. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[25]  D. Guillarme,et al.  Robust UHPLC Separation Method Development for Multi-API Product Containing Amlodipine and Bisoprolol: The Impact of Column Selection , 2014, Chromatographia.

[26]  Szabolcs Fekete,et al.  Validated UPLC method for the fast and sensitive determination of steroid residues in support of cleaning validation in formulation area. , 2009, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[27]  T. Dzido,et al.  Computer-aided optimization of high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of flavonoids from some species of the genus Althaea , 1991 .

[28]  J. Dolan,et al.  Selectivity differences for C18 and C8 reversed-phase columns as a function of temperature and gradient steepness. II. Minimizing column reproducibility problems. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[29]  Gesa Schada,et al.  3-Dimensional Retention Modelling of Gradient Time , Ternary Solvent-Strength and Temperature of the Reversed-phase Gradient Liquid Chromatography of a Complex Mixture of 22 Basic and Neutral Analytes using DryLab ® 2010 , 2010 .

[30]  L. Snyder,et al.  Two-dimensional optimization using different pairs of variables for the reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of a mixture of acidic compounds. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[31]  I. Molnár,et al.  High-performance liquid chromatographic separation of the impurities in a pharmaceutical raw material with the aid of computer simulation , 1996 .

[32]  D. Guillarme,et al.  Robust UHPLC Separation Method Development for Multi-API Product Amlodipine and Bisoprolol : The Impact of Column Selection , 2014 .

[33]  D. Guillarme,et al.  Practical method development for the separation of monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug-conjugate species in hydrophobic interaction chromatoraphy, part 2: Optimization of the phase system. , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[34]  L. Snyder,et al.  Selectivity differences for C18 and C8 reversed-phase columns as a function of temperature and gradient steepness. I. Optimizing selectivity and resolution. , 2000, Journal of chromatography. A.

[35]  Imre Molnar,et al.  Computerized design of separation strategies by reversed-phase liquid chromatography: development of DryLab software. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[36]  Imre Molnár,et al.  Quality by design in pharmaceutical analysis using computer simulation with UHPLC , 2014 .

[37]  I. Molnár,et al.  Quality by Design: Multidimensional exploration of the design space in high performance liquid chromatography method development for better robustness before validation. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[38]  K. Reif,et al.  Determination of 1,8-dihydroxyanthranoids in senna , 1996 .

[39]  J. Dolan,et al.  DryLab computer simulation for high-performance liquid chromatographic method development. II. Gradient elution. , 1989, Journal of chromatography.

[40]  C. Chamseddin,et al.  Multifactorial design principles applied for the simultaneous separation of local anesthetics using chromatography modeling software , 2014 .

[41]  B. Boyes,et al.  Fast high performance liquid chromatography separations for proteomic applications using Fused-Core® silica particles. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[42]  Yimin Hua,et al.  A platform analytical quality by design (AQbD) approach for multiple UHPLC-UV and UHPLC-MS methods development for protein analysis. , 2016, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[43]  I. Molnár,et al.  Computerized optimization of the high-performance liquid chromatographic enantioseparation of a mixture of 4-dinitrophenyl amino acids on a quinine carbamate-type chiral stationary phase using DRYLAB. , 1997, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.