Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health.

Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging in concert with tracer-kinetic modeling affords the assessment of regional myocardial blood flow (MBF) of the left ventricle in absolute terms (milliliters per gram per minute). Assessment of MBF both at rest and during various forms of vasomotor stress provides insight into early and subclinical abnormalities in coronary arterial vascular function and/or structure, noninvasively. The noninvasive evaluation and quantification of MBF and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) extend the scope of conventional myocardial perfusion imaging from detection of end-stage, advanced, and flow-limiting, epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) to early stages of atherosclerosis or microvascular dysfunction. Recent studies have shown that impaired hyperemic MBF or MFR with PET, with or without accompanying CAD, is predictive of increased relative risk of death or progression of heart failure. Quantitative approaches that measure MBF with PET identify multivessel CAD and offer the opportunity to monitor responses to lifestyle and/or risk factor modification and to therapeutic interventions. Whether improvement or normalization of hyperemic MBF and/or the MFR will translate to improvement in long-term cardiovascular outcome remains clinically untested. In the meantime, absolute measures of MBF with PET can be used as a surrogate marker for coronary vascular health, and to monitor therapeutic interventions. Although the assessment of myocardial perfusion with PET has become an indispensable tool in cardiac research, it remains underutilized in clinical practice. Individualized, image-guided cardiovascular therapy may likely change this paradigm in the near future.

[1]  P. Ganz,et al.  Testing endothelial vasomotor function: nitric oxide, a multipotent molecule. , 2003, Circulation.

[2]  D. Berman,et al.  Underestimation of extent of ischemia by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left main coronary artery disease , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[3]  K. Gould,et al.  Does coronary flow trump coronary anatomy? , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[4]  M. Nieminen,et al.  Association of carotid intima-media thickness with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  M. Phelps,et al.  Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose. , 1989, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  PET myocardial perfusion and metabolism clinical imaging , 2009 .

[7]  John O. Prior,et al.  Relationship between increasing body weight, insulin resistance, inflammation, adipocytokine leptin, and coronary circulatory function. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  G. B. John Mancini,et al.  Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibition, with Quinapril, Improves Endothelial Vasomotor Dysfunction in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: the TREND Study (Trial on REversing ENdothelial Dysfunction) , 1996 .

[9]  Guido Germano,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy With or Without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention to Reduce Ischemic Burden: Results From the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) Trial Nuclear Substudy , 2008, Circulation.

[10]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  PET: Molecular Imaging and Its Biological Applications , 2004 .

[11]  D. Levy,et al.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. , 1998, Circulation.

[12]  D E Kuhl,et al.  Comparison of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography and thallium-201 SPECT imaging for detection of coronary artery disease. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  J. Yap,et al.  Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  M. Phelps,et al.  Influence of Age and Hemodynamics on Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve , 1993, Circulation.

[15]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. , 2000 .

[16]  G. Fakhri,et al.  Quantitative relationship between coronary vasodilator reserve assessed by 82Rb PET imaging and coronary artery stenosis severity , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[17]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  Nuclear Cardiac Stress Testing in the Era of Molecular Medicine* , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  O. Rimoldi,et al.  Assessment of the long-term reproducibility of baseline and dobutamine-induced myocardial blood flow in patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  P. Camici Absolute figures are better than percentages. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[20]  John O. Prior,et al.  Assessment of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of rest and cold pressor test-stimulated myocardial blood flow with 13N-ammonia and PET , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  Marcelo F. Di Carli,et al.  Advances in positron emission tomography , 2004 .

[22]  ThomasMünzel,et al.  Vascular Consequences of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Uncoupling for the Activity and Expression of the Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase and the cGMP-Dependent Protein Kinase , 2005 .

[23]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypercholesterolemia. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  W. Smith,et al.  Quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography imaging: A counts-based method for display and measurement of regional and global ventricular systolic function , 1997, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[25]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Improvement in coronary endothelial function is independently associated with a slowed progression of coronary artery calcification in type 2 diabetes mellitus. , 2009, European heart journal.

[26]  John O. Prior,et al.  PET-measured responses of MBF to cold pressor testing correlate with indices of coronary vasomotion on quantitative coronary angiography. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  O Muzik,et al.  Validation of nitrogen-13-ammonia tracer kinetic model for quantification of myocardial blood flow using PET. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  G. Hutchins,et al.  Interobserver and interstudy variability of myocardial blood flow and flow-reserve measurements with nitrogen 13 ammonia-labeled positron emission tomography , 1995, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[29]  R. Kwong,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of gated Rb-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical variables and rest LVEF. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[30]  H. Schelbert,et al.  L-Arginine normalizes coronary vasomotion in long-term smokers. , 1999, Circulation.

[31]  Georges El Fakhri,et al.  Reproducibility and Accuracy of Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow Assessment with 82Rb PET: Comparison with 13N-Ammonia PET , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  N. Mullani,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography. Comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients. , 1989, Circulation.

[33]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[34]  Filippo Crea,et al.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  M. Phelps,et al.  Reproducibility of measurements of regional resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow assessed with PET. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  V. Fuster,et al.  Disease Prevention: The moving target of global cardiovascular health , 2009, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[37]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow in humans. A direct comparison of the [13N]ammonia and the [15O]water techniques. , 1996, Circulation.

[38]  Ran Klein,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[39]  Uchechukwu Sampson,et al.  Value of vasodilator left ventricular ejection fraction reserve in evaluating the magnitude of myocardium at risk and the extent of angiographic coronary artery disease: a 82Rb PET/CT study. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  John O. Prior,et al.  Effect of hormone replacement therapy on vasomotor function of the coronary microcirculation in post-menopausal women with medically treated cardiovascular risk factors. , 2008, European heart journal.

[41]  J. Stengård,et al.  Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase as predictors of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus before clinical onset of disease , 1994, The Lancet.

[42]  O. Rimoldi,et al.  The Clinical Value of Myocardial Blood Flow Measurement* , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography of the Heart: Methodology, Findings in the Normal and the Diseased Heart, and Clinical Applications , 2004 .

[44]  Pascal Meier,et al.  Beneficial Effect of Recruitable Collaterals: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Quantitative Collateral Measurements , 2007, Circulation.

[45]  F. Coppi,et al.  Prognostic role of reversible endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive postmenopausal women. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[47]  S S Gambhir,et al.  Quantification of Regional Myocardial Blood Flow Using 13N‐Ammonia and Reoriented Dynamic Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging , 1992, Circulation.

[48]  V. Treyer,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by dynamic O-15-labeled water PET imaging: Validation of a new fast factor analysis , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[49]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary flow reserve and pharmacologic stress perfusion imaging: beginnings and evolution. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[50]  H. Schelbert Quantifying Myocardial Perfusion for the Assessment of Preclinical CAD , 2007 .

[51]  C J Slager,et al.  Comparative validation of quantitative coronary angiography systems. Results and implications from a multicenter study using a standardized approach. , 1995, Circulation.

[52]  Stephen L. Bacharach,et al.  Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion and glucose metabolism imaging , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[53]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Microcirculatory Function in Postmenopausal Women and Effects of Short-Term and Long-Term Estrogen Administration , 2002, Circulation.

[54]  Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1994, The Lancet.

[55]  D. Berman,et al.  Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CAD. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[56]  John O. Prior,et al.  Structural alterations of the coronary arterial wall are associated with myocardial flow heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes mellitus , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[57]  J. Hodgson,et al.  Evidence that selective endothelial dysfunction may occur in the absence of angiographic or ultrasound atherosclerosis in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[58]  T. Lüscher,et al.  Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition with quinapril improves endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. The TREND (Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction) Study. , 1996, Circulation.

[59]  S. Daniels,et al.  America's children: a critical time for prevention. , 2005, Circulation.

[60]  W J MacIntyre,et al.  A prospective comparison of rubidium-82 PET and thallium-201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  Bernd J Pichler,et al.  Latest Advances in Molecular Imaging Instrumentation , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[62]  L. Deckelbaum,et al.  Intracoronary Doppler assessment of moderate coronary artery disease: comparison with 201Tl imaging and coronary angiography. FACTS Study Group. , 1997, Circulation.

[63]  John O. Prior,et al.  Coronary Circulatory Dysfunction in Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2005, Circulation.

[64]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Evaluation of the Novel Myocardial Perfusion Positron-Emission Tomography Tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: Comparison to 13N-Ammonia and Validation With Microspheres in a Pig Model , 2009, Circulation.

[65]  Raymond Kwong,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[66]  Georges El Fakhri,et al.  Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[67]  J. Knuuti,et al.  Myocardial perfusion quantitation with 15O-labelled water PET: high reproducibility of the new cardiac analysis software (Carimas™) , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[68]  W. Burchert,et al.  Beneficial effects of atorvastatin on myocardial regions with initially low vasodilatory capacity at various stages of coronary artery disease , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[69]  John D Friedman,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: Comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[70]  A. Fischman,et al.  Comparison of positron emission tomography measurement of adenosine-stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow versus relative myocardial tracer content for physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[71]  D. Berman,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in the Elderly , 2009, Circulation.

[72]  P. Camici,et al.  Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  Keiichiro Yoshinaga,et al.  What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[74]  John O. Prior,et al.  Improvement in coronary vascular dysfunction produced with euglycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes , 2006, Heart.

[75]  O Muzik,et al.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion by positron emission tomography. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[76]  B. Chow,et al.  Treadmill exercise produces larger perfusion defects than dipyridamole stress N-13 ammonia positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[77]  S. Achenbach,et al.  The year in coronary artery disease. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[78]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  Bicycle exercise stress in PET for assessment of coronary flow reserve: repeatability and comparison with adenosine stress. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[79]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Cardiac positron emission tomography. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[80]  Gram Jb,et al.  The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) , 1995 .

[81]  U. Gleichmann,et al.  Improvement in coronary flow reserve determined by positron emission tomography after 6 months of cholesterol-lowering therapy in patients with early stages of coronary atherosclerosis. , 1999, Circulation.

[82]  G. Beller,et al.  Decision making in multivessel coronary disease: the need for physiological lesion assessment. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[83]  M J Welch,et al.  Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H2150* , 2005 .

[84]  Gerald M. Pohost,et al.  Cardiac CT, PET and MR , 2006 .

[85]  V. Dilsizian,et al.  PET Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion , 2010 .

[86]  A. Zeiher,et al.  Microvascular dysfunction in angiographically normal or mildly diseased coronary arteries predicts adverse cardiovascular long-term outcome , 2004, Coronary artery disease.

[87]  Marcelo F. Di Carli,et al.  Cardiac PET and PET/CT imaging / , 2007 .

[88]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Dobutamine positron emission tomography: absolute quantitation of rest and dobutamine myocardial blood flow and correlation with cardiac work and percent diameter stenosis in patients with and without coronary artery disease. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[89]  Ran Klein,et al.  Generator-produced rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging-From basic aspects to clinical applications. , 2010, Journal of cardiology.

[90]  A F Laine,et al.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion in human subjects using 82Rb and wavelet-based noise reduction. , 2001, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[91]  M. Lauer,et al.  Incremental value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography for prognostic assessment of known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[92]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[93]  Hans L Hillege,et al.  Comparison Between the Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[94]  S. Nekolla,et al.  Evaluation of a Novel 18F-Labeled Positron-Emission Tomography Perfusion Tracer for the Assessment of Myocardial Infarct Size in Rats , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[95]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Advances in positron emission tomography imaging for the GI tract. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[96]  William Wijns,et al.  Relation Between Myocardial Blood Flow and the Severity of Coronary-Artery Stenosis , 1995 .

[97]  Adriaan A. Lammertsma,et al.  Noninvasive Quantification of Regional Myocardial Blood Flow in Coronary Artery Disease With Oxygen‐15–Labeled Carbon Dioxide Inhalation and Positron Emission Tomography , 1991, Circulation.

[98]  G. Beller,et al.  Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery disease. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[99]  Juhani Knuuti,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow will reform the detection of CAD , 2009, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[100]  N. Tamaki,et al.  Olmesartan, but not amlodipine, improves endothelium-dependent coronary dilation in hypertensive patients. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[101]  A. Luxen,et al.  Direct Comparison of [13N]Ammonia and [150]Water Estimates of Perfusion With Quantification of Regional Myocardial Blood Flow by Microspheres , 1993, Circulation.

[102]  Robert Elashoff,et al.  Coronary Vasomotor Abnormalities in Insulin-Resistant Individuals , 2004, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[103]  Osamu Manabe,et al.  Repeatability of Rest and Hyperemic Myocardial Blood Flow Measurements with 82Rb Dynamic PET , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[104]  Hatem Alkadhi,et al.  Repeatability of cold pressor test-induced flow increase assessed with H(2)(15)O and PET. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[105]  A. Zeiher,et al.  Endothelial Function: Cardiac Events , 2005, Circulation.

[106]  Erland Erdmann,et al.  Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial , 2005, The Lancet.

[107]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Chest Pain , 2006, Circulation.

[108]  G. Beller Underestimation of coronary artery disease with SPECT perfusion imaging , 2008, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[109]  A. Takahashi,et al.  Quantitative Measures of Coronary Stenosis Severity by 64-Slice CT Angiography and Relation to Physiologic Significance of Perfusion in Nonobese Patients: Comparison with Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[110]  J. Slattery,et al.  Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). 1994. , 1994, Atherosclerosis. Supplements.

[111]  N. Tamaki,et al.  Myocardial flow reserve is influenced by both coronary artery stenosis severity and coronary risk factors in patients with suspected coronary artery disease , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[112]  I. Olivotto,et al.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction and prognosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[113]  D. Neglia,et al.  Prognostic Role of Myocardial Blood Flow Impairment in Idiopathic Left Ventricular Dysfunction , 2002, Circulation.

[114]  Michael Kreissl,et al.  Positron emission tomography-measured abnormal responses of myocardial blood flow to sympathetic stimulation are associated with the risk of developing cardiovascular events. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[115]  John O. Prior,et al.  Chronic Inflammation and Impaired Coronary Vasoreactivity in Patients With Coronary Risk Factors , 2004, Circulation.

[116]  W. Wijns,et al.  Fractional flow reserve and myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with angiographic multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[117]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Validation of PET-acquired input functions for cardiac studies. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[118]  M E Phelps,et al.  Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1995, Circulation.

[119]  Amir Lerman,et al.  Endothelial Dysfunction: A Marker of Atherosclerotic Risk , 2003, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[120]  P. Marraccini,et al.  Altered coronary vasodilator reserve and metabolism in myocardium subtended by normal arteries in patients with coronary artery disease. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[121]  R. Karas,et al.  HRT and the young at heart. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[122]  Prognostic Value of Systemic Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Further Evidence for the Existence of the “Vulnerable” Patient , 2004, Circulation.

[123]  D. Berman,et al.  Cardiovascular imaging research at the crossroads. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[124]  M. Phelps,et al.  Effect of short-term cardiovascular conditioning and low-fat diet on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. , 1995, Circulation.

[125]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Role of PET in the evaluation and understanding of coronary physiology , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[126]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Coronary vasodilator reserve and Framingham risk scores in subjects at risk for coronary artery disease , 2006, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.