Universal Design Based Evaluation Framework for Design of Wearables

In our previous study, we have reviewed the existing criteria from different design domains that seem as relevant for the design and assessment of the wearables. Our next goal is developing a Universal Design-based assessment framework, which should cover all three layers of the Universal Design model: the transcending principle, process-related principles, and human factors principles. The equity principle says that an application of design is universally inclusive for all kinds of different users. We propose starting an evaluation with the assessment of equity, using a revised version of the guidelines of the National Institute of Health for Equality Impact Assessment. The process-related principles include flexibility, error-management, efficiency, and stability and predictability. For these principles, we propose the use of well-established usability evaluation tools with focusing on the principles listed above. For the evaluation of human factors principles, which include ergonomic, perception and cognition principles, we propose the use of the Inclusive Design Toolkit developed by the Engineering Design Centre of the University of Cambridge. A combination of mentioned above three tools can provide a comprehensive and fast evaluation framework for wearables and other types of design artifacts, which do not have interactions with screen-based input/output devices.

[1]  Daniel Bradlow Can Parallel Lines Ever Meet? The Strange Case of the International Standards on Sovereign Debt and Business and Human Rights , 2016 .

[2]  Vimla L. Patel,et al.  Using usability heuristics to evaluate patient safety of medical devices , 2003, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[3]  Cristian Rusu,et al.  Usability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices: update , 2013, ChileCHI '13.

[4]  Vladimir Tomberg,et al.  Towards Universal Design Criteria for Design of Wearables , 2016 .

[5]  J. Mann,et al.  Towards the development of a human rights impact assessment for the formulation and evaluation of public health policies. , 1994, Health and human rights.

[6]  Selwyn Goldsmith,et al.  Designing for the disabled , 1967 .

[7]  Areej Al-Wabil,et al.  Usability Heuristics for the Design of Interactive Attention Assessment and Rehabilitation Technologies , 2015, HCI.

[8]  A. Culyer,et al.  An Equity Framework for Health Technology Assessments , 2012, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[9]  Helen Petrie,et al.  The Evaluation of Accessibility, Usability, and User Experience , 2009, The Universal Access Handbook.

[10]  Richard Martin,et al.  Design for wearability , 1998, Digest of Papers. Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers (Cat. No.98EX215).

[11]  K. Brown Leadership for Social Justice and Equity: Evaluating a Transformative Framework and Andragogy , 2006 .

[12]  Joseph F. Dumas,et al.  A Practical Guide to Usability Testing , 1993 .

[13]  Ian Hosking,et al.  Making the case for inclusive design. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[14]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  Wearables for all: development of guidelines to stimulate accessible wearable technology design , 2016, W4A.

[15]  Ernest J. McCormick,et al.  Human Factors Engineering , 1985 .

[16]  Vladimir Tomberg,et al.  Teaching Design for All Through Empathic Modeling: A Case Study in Tallinn University , 2014, HCI.

[17]  Wolfgang F. E. Preiser UNIVERSAL DESIGN: FROM POLICY TO ASSESSMENT RESEARCH AND PRACTICE , 2008 .

[18]  Pj Clarkson,et al.  Inclusive design toolkit , 2007 .

[19]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  The Universal Access Handbook , 2009 .

[20]  Asmaa Alsumait,et al.  Usability Heuristics Evaluation for Child E-learning Applications , 2010 .

[21]  Vladimir Tomberg,et al.  Applying Universal Design Principles to Themes for Wearables , 2015, HCI.

[22]  Itzhak Omer,et al.  Evaluating accessibility using house-level data: A spatial equity perspective , 2006, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[23]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches , 2004 .

[24]  P John Clarkson,et al.  History of Inclusive Design in the UK. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[25]  Abdusselam Selami Cifter,et al.  Designing for designers: insights into the knowledge users of inclusive design. , 2015, Applied ergonomics.

[26]  A Morgan,et al.  A conceptual framework for public health: NICE's emerging approach. , 2009, Public health.

[27]  Robert F. Erlandson,et al.  Universal and Accessible Design for Products, Services, and Processes , 2007 .