Quantifier Words and Their Multi-functional(?) Parts

Formal semantic analyses often take words to be minimal building blocks for the purposes of compositionality. But various recent theories of morphology and syntax have converged on the view that there is no demarcation line corresponding to the word level. The same conclusion has emerged from the compositional semantics of superlatives. In the spirit of extending compositionality below the word level, this paper explores how a small set of particles (Japanese ka and mo, Chinese dou, and Hungarian vala/vagy, mind, and is) form quantifier words and serve as connectives, additive and scalar particles, question markers, and existential verbs. Our main question is whether the meanings of these particles across the varied environments are highly regular, or they are lexicalized with a variety of different meanings that bear a family resemblance. This paper does not reach definitive conclusions, but it raises analytical possibilities using Boolean semantics and Inquisitive Semantics (the semantics of alternative...

[1]  Scott AnderBois,et al.  Focus and uninformativity in Yucatec Maya questions , 2012 .

[2]  Mana Kobuchi-Philip Presuppositional Compositionality with Japanese "mo" , 2008 .

[3]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content , 2013, Synthese.

[4]  Malte Zimmermann,et al.  Variation in the expression of universal quantification and free choice: The case of Hausa koo-wh expressions , 2009 .

[5]  Martin Hackl,et al.  On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most versus more than half , 2009 .

[6]  Seth Cable,et al.  The Grammar of Q: Q-Particles, Wh-Movement, and Pied-Piping , 2010 .

[7]  Richard S. Kayne Movement and silence , 2005 .

[8]  K. A. Jayaseelan Comparative morphology of quantifiers , 2011 .

[9]  Mürvet Enç The semantics of specificity , 1991 .

[10]  Magyar Tudományos Akadémia. Nyelvtudományi Intézet,et al.  A magyar nyelv történeti-etimológiai szótára , 1967 .

[11]  D. Gil Universal Quantifiers and Distributivity , 1995 .

[12]  Mana Kobuchi-Philip Japanese Mo: Universal, Additive, and NPI , 2009 .

[13]  Kazuko Yatsushiro,et al.  The distribution of quantificational suffixes in Japanese , 2009 .

[14]  Shi-Zhe Huang,et al.  Quantification and Predication in Mandarin Chinese: A Case Study of Dou , 1996 .

[15]  Thomas Leu,et al.  The internal syntax of jeder 'every'* , 2009 .

[16]  Chung-chieh Shan Binding Alongside Hamblin Alternatives Calls for Variable-free Semantics , 2004 .

[17]  Mana Kobuchi-Philip,et al.  Indeterminate Numeral Quantifiers, ‘Some’ and ‘Many’ Readings, and Questions in Japanese , 2010 .

[18]  Benjamin Slade Formal and philological inquiries into the nature of interrogatives, indefinites, disjunction, and focus in Sinhala and other languages , 2011 .

[19]  Mats Rooth A theory of focus interpretation , 1992, Natural Language Semantics.

[20]  C. L. Hamblin QUESTIONS IN MONTAGUE ENGLISH , 1976 .

[21]  R. Amritivalli Question and Negative Polarity in the Disjunction Phrase , 2003 .

[22]  Taisuke Nishigauchi,et al.  Quantification in the theory of grammar , 1990 .

[23]  Junko Shimoyama,et al.  Indeterminate Phrase Quantification in Japanese , 2006 .

[24]  Seth Cable The Grammar of Q , 2010 .

[25]  K. Kiss Syntax of Hungarian , 2017 .

[26]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  Handbook of quantifiers in natural language , 2012 .

[27]  T. Reinhart Quantifier Scope: How labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions , 1997 .

[28]  Philippe Schlenker,et al.  Be Articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection , 2008 .

[29]  Thomas Leu,et al.  The internal syntax of determiners , 2008 .

[30]  Anna Szabolcsi Background Notions in Lattice Theory and Generalized Quantifiers , 1997 .

[31]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most , 2012 .

[32]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Quantification in Hungarian , 2012 .

[33]  Richard S. Kayne Comparisons and Contrasts , 2010 .

[34]  Anna Szabolcsi Strategies for Scope Taking , 1997 .

[35]  David Gil Conjunctions and Universal Quantifiers , 2005 .

[36]  Floris Roelofsen,et al.  Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics , 2009 .

[37]  Marit Julien,et al.  Syntactic heads and word formation , 2002 .

[38]  J. Barwise,et al.  Generalized quantifiers and natural language , 1981 .

[39]  Halldor Armann Sigurðsson,et al.  The syntax of Person, Tense, and speech features , 2004 .

[40]  Hans Reichenbach,et al.  Elements of symbolic logic , 1948 .

[41]  Takuya Goro,et al.  The Acquisition of Disjunction and Positive Polarity in Japanese , 2004 .

[42]  Hilda Koopman,et al.  Korean (and Japanese) Morphology from a Syntactic Perspective , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[43]  Anna Szabolcsi Quantifiers in Pair-List Readings , 1997 .

[44]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics , 2006 .

[45]  T. Gonen,et al.  Questions , 1927, Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care.

[46]  Anna Szabolcsi Ways of Scope Taking , 1997 .

[47]  Jo-wang Lin,et al.  Distributivity in Chinese and its Implications , 1998 .

[48]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Some key features of distributed morphology , 1994 .

[49]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  The World Atlas of Language Structures Online , 2013 .

[50]  Association Focus , 1999 .

[51]  Michal Starke,et al.  Nanosyntax : A short primer to a new approach to language , 2010 .

[52]  K. A. Jayaseelan Questions and Question‐word Incorporating Quantifiers in Malayalam , 2001 .

[53]  L. Karttunen Syntax and Semantics of Questions , 1977 .

[54]  T. Stowell,et al.  Distributivity and Negation: The Syntax of Each and Every , 1997 .

[55]  Luis Alonso-Ovalle,et al.  Disjunction in Alternative Semantics , 2010 .

[56]  Salvador Mascarenhas,et al.  Inquisitive Semantics and Logic , 2009 .

[57]  Anna Szabolcsi,et al.  Hungarian Disjunctions and Positive Polarity , 2002 .

[58]  Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng,et al.  (In)Definiteness, Polarity, and the Role of wh-morphology in Free Choice , 2006, J. Semant..

[59]  Thomas W. Stewart Universals in comparative morphology: suppletion, superlatives and the structure of words , 2015 .

[60]  Ming Xiang,et al.  Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou , 2008 .

[61]  Heidi Harley,et al.  81. Semantics in Distributed Morphology , 2012 .

[62]  L. M. Faltz,et al.  Boolean semantics for natural language , 1984 .

[63]  F. Landman Structures for semantics , 1991 .

[64]  Pauline Jacobson The (Dis)organization of the Grammar: 25 Years , 2002 .

[65]  Ileana Paul,et al.  Or, Wh - and Not: Free Choice and Polarity in Malagasy , 2005 .