Temperature‐induced tissue susceptibility changes lead to significant temperature errors in PRFS‐based MR thermometry during thermal interventions

Proton resonance frequency shift‐based MR thermometry (MRT) is hampered by temporal magnetic field changes. Temporal changes in the magnetic susceptibility distribution lead to nonlocal field changes and are, therefore, a possible source of errors. The magnetic volume susceptibility of tissue is temperature dependent. For water‐like tissues, this dependency is in the order of 0.002 ppm/°C. For fat, it is in the same order of magnitude as the temperature dependence of the proton electron screening constant of water (0.01 ppm/°C). For this reason, proton resonance frequency shift‐based MR thermometry in fatty tissues, like the human breast, is expected to be prone to errors. We aimed to quantify the influence of the temperature dependence of the susceptibility on proton resonance frequency shift‐based MR thermometry. Heating experiments were performed in a controlled phantom set‐up to show the impact of temperature‐induced susceptibility changes on actual proton resonance frequency shift‐based temperature maps. To study the implications for a clinical case, simulations were performed in a 3D breast model. Temperature errors were quantified by computation of magnetic field changes in the glandular tissue, resulting from susceptibility changes in a thermally heated region. The results of the experiments and simulations showed that the temperature‐induced susceptibility changes of water and fat lead to significant errors in proton resonance frequency shift‐based MR thermometry. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Bruno Quesson,et al.  Three‐dimensional spatial and temporal temperature control with MR thermometry‐guided focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Sharon Thomsen,et al.  Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery of breast cancer: reliability and effectiveness. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[3]  D. Gianfelice,et al.  Influence of post-treatment delay on the evaluation of the response to focused ultrasound surgery of breast cancer by dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. , 2006, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Application of a Fourier‐based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility , 2005 .

[5]  D. Gianfelice,et al.  MR Imaging-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery of Breast Cancer: Correlation of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI with Histopathologic Findings , 2003, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[6]  D. Gianfelice,et al.  Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery as an adjunct to tamoxifen therapy in high-risk surgical patients with breast carcinoma. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[7]  D. Gianfelice,et al.  MR imaging-guided focused US ablation of breast cancer: histopathologic assessment of effectiveness-- initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[8]  J. Debus,et al.  A new noninvasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. , 2001, Cancer research.

[9]  F A Jolesz,et al.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[10]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Heat‐source orientation and geometry dependence in proton‐resonance frequency shift magnetic resonance thermometry , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  D. Julian McClements,et al.  Physical properties of liquid edible oils , 1997 .

[12]  F W Wehrli,et al.  Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: Magnetic susceptibility of bone. , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  J V Hajnal,et al.  An evaluation of the effects of susceptibility changes on the water chemical shift method of temperature measurement in human peripheral muscle , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[15]  M A Moerland,et al.  Analysis and correction of geometric distortions in 1.5 T magnetic resonance images for use in radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  W. Dewey,et al.  Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  J. Philo,et al.  Temperature dependence of the diamagnetism of water , 1980 .

[18]  J. Hindman,et al.  Proton Resonance Shift of Water in the Gas and Liquid States , 1966 .

[19]  Kiyoshi Namba,et al.  The evolving non-surgical ablation of breast cancer: Mr Guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) , 2007, Breast cancer.

[20]  M. Papa,et al.  The use of MR imaging guided focused ultrasound in breast cancer patients; a preliminary phase one study and review , 2005, Breast cancer.

[21]  C. Moonen,et al.  A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility , 2003 .

[22]  Rudolf Stollberger,et al.  Invited. Temperature monitoring of interstitial thermal tissue coagulation using MR phase images , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  J. De Poorter,et al.  Noninvasive MRI thermometry with the proton resonance frequency method: study of susceptibility effects. , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.