Percolation Degree of Secondary Users in Cognitive Networks

A cognitive network refers to the one where two overlaid structures, called primary and secondary networks coexist. The primary network consists of primary nodes who are licensed spectrum users while the secondary network comprises unauthorized users that have to access the licensed spectrum opportunistically. In this paper, we study the percolation degree of the secondary network to achieve k-percolation in large scale cognitive radio networks. The percolation degree is defined as the number of nearest neighbors for each secondary user when there are at least k vertex-disjoint paths existing between any two secondary relays in the percolated cluster. The percolated cluster is formed when there are an infinite number of mutually connected secondary users spanning the whole network. Each user in the cluster is possibly connected to several neighbors, inducing more communication links between any two of them. Since nodes located near the boundary have fewer neighbors, the boundary effect becomes a bottleneck in determining the percolation degree. For cognitive networks, when the primary node density becomes considerably large, the boundary effect spreads inside the network. The transmission area of most secondary users who are located near the primary nodes decreases due to the restriction of the primary network. Therefore, to ensure k-connectivity in the percolated cluster, each secondary user must be connected to more neighbors, and the percolation degree of the secondary network yields a function of the primary node density. We specify the relationship into three regimes regarding the topology variation of the cognitive network. A closed-form expression of the percolation degree under different primary node densities is presented. The expression characterizes the connectivity strength in the secondary percolated cluster, therefore providing analytical insight on fault tolerance improvement in cognitive networks.

[1]  Yingshu Li,et al.  Sparse target counting and localization in sensor networks based on compressive sensing , 2011, 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[2]  Shaojie Tang,et al.  Multicast capacity of multihop cognitive networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE 6th International Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems.

[3]  Weijia Jia,et al.  Full-Coverage and k-Connectivity (k=14,6) Three Dimensional Networks , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[4]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Fault tolerant deployment and topology control in wireless networks , 2003, MobiHoc '03.

[5]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  On the Connectivity and Multihop Delay of Ad Hoc Cognitive Radio Networks , 2009, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[6]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[7]  Yu Wang,et al.  Robust deployment and fault tolerant topology control for wireless ad hoc networks , 2003 .

[8]  R. Meester,et al.  Continuum percolation: References , 1996 .

[9]  P. Nt Poisson process , 2000 .

[10]  Patrick Thiran,et al.  Latency of wireless sensor networks with uncoordinated power saving mechanisms , 2004, MobiHoc '04.

[11]  D. J. White,et al.  Dynamic Boolean models , 1997 .

[12]  Li Xiao,et al.  Improving unstructured peer-to-peer systems by adaptive connection establishment , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[13]  Peng-Jun Wan,et al.  Asymptotic Critical Transmission Radius for $k$-Connectivity in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  On the Phase Transition Width of K-Connectivity in Wireless Multihop Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[15]  Piyush Gupta,et al.  Critical Power for Asymptotic Connectivity in Wireless Networks , 1999 .

[16]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Exploring the hidden connectivity in urban vehicular networks , 2010, The 18th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols.

[17]  Mathew D. Penrose,et al.  On k-connectivity for a geometric random graph , 1999, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[18]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Phase Transition Width of Connectivity of Wireless Multi-Hop Networks in Shadowing Environment , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[19]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  Closing the Gap in the Capacity of Wireless Networks Via Percolation Theory , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[20]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[21]  Sajal K. Das,et al.  Critical Density for Coverage and Connectivity in Three-Dimensional Wireless Sensor Networks Using Continuum Percolation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[22]  Wei Cheng,et al.  3D Underwater Sensor Network Localization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[23]  Weijia Jia,et al.  Three Dimensional Networks , 2009 .