Concurrent Imaging of Markers of Current Flow and Neurophysiological Changes During tDCS

Despite being a popular neuromodulation technique, clinical translation of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is hampered by variable responses observed within treatment cohorts. Addressing this challenge has been difficult due to the lack of an effective means of mapping the neuromodulatory electromagnetic fields together with the brain’s response. In this study, we present a novel imaging technique that provides the capability of concurrently mapping markers of tDCS currents, as well as the brain’s response to tDCS. A dual-echo echo-planar imaging (DE-EPI) sequence is used, wherein the phase of the acquired MRI-signal encodes the tDCS current induced magnetic field, while the magnitude encodes the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast. The proposed technique was first validated in a custom designed phantom. Subsequent test–retest experiments in human participants showed that tDCS-induced magnetic fields can be detected reliably in vivo. The concurrently acquired BOLD data revealed large-scale networks characteristic of a brain in resting-state as well as a ‘cathodal’ and an ‘anodal’ resting-state component under each electrode. Moreover, ‘cathodal’s BOLD-signal was observed to significantly decrease with the applied current at the group level in all datasets. With its ability to image markers of electromagnetic cause as well as neurophysiological changes, the proposed technique may provide an effective means to visualize neural engagement in tDCS at the group level. Our technique also contributes to addressing confounding factors in applying BOLD fMRI concurrently with tDCS.

[1]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Statistical validation of image segmentation quality based on a spatial overlap index. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[3]  M. Schölvinck,et al.  Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Trong-Kha Truong,et al.  Toward direct MRI of neuro‐electro‐magnetic oscillations in the human brain , 2019, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Ipsilesional anodal tDCS enhances the functional benefits of rehabilitation in patients after stroke , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Biophysical modeling of phase changes in BOLD fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[7]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[8]  Yu Huang,et al.  ROAST: An Open-Source, Fully-Automated, Realistic Volumetric-Approach-Based Simulator For TES , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[9]  Tony W. Wilson,et al.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study , 2017, Cortex.

[10]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Introducing graph theory to track for neuroplastic alterations in the resting human brain: A transcranial direct current stimulation study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[11]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Brain state and polarity dependent modulation of brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[12]  J. Bodurka,et al.  Toward direct mapping of neuronal activity: MRI detection of ultraweak, transient magnetic field changes , 2002 .

[13]  Mayank A. Jog,et al.  Developmental trajectories of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism at baseline and during working memory tasks , 2016, NeuroImage.

[14]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of the brain , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  Donel M. Martin,et al.  Cognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy and Clinical Populations: An Overview. , 2018, The journal of ECT.

[16]  Min-Fang Kuo,et al.  The application of tDCS for the treatment of psychiatric diseases , 2017, International review of psychiatry.

[17]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[18]  Stefano Vicari,et al.  Use of Transcranial Direct Stimulation in the Treatment of Negative Symptoms of Schizophrenia , 2018, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[19]  Kay Jann,et al.  In-vivo Imaging of Magnetic Fields Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Human Brain using MRI , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during fMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  M. Joy,et al.  In vivo detection of applied electric currents by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Transcranial electrical stimulation of the occipital cortex during visual perception modifies the magnitude of BOLD activity: A combined tES–fMRI approach , 2016, NeuroImage.

[23]  Guo-Rong Wu,et al.  Increased left prefrontal brain perfusion after MRI compatible tDCS attenuates momentary ruminative self-referential thoughts , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[24]  Felipe Fregni,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depressive disorder: A summary of preclinical, clinical and translational findings , 2012, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[25]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Functional brain connectivity in resting-state fMRI using phase and magnitude data , 2018, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation changes resting state functional connectivity: A large-scale brain network modeling study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[28]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016 , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[30]  J. Schenck The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[31]  R. Young,et al.  Brain stimulation. , 1990, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[32]  Xin Zheng,et al.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on human regional cerebral blood flow , 2011, NeuroImage.

[33]  Melissa Kirkovski,et al.  A double-blind HD-tDCS/EEG study examining right temporoparietal junction involvement in facial emotion processing , 2019, Social neuroscience.

[34]  Lucia M. Li,et al.  The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies , 2015, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[35]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS , 2013, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Detre,et al.  Arterial spin labeling perfusion fMRI with very low task frequency , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Curtis L. Johnson,et al.  Real‐time 4D phase unwrapping applied to magnetic resonance elastography , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Klaus Scheffler,et al.  Human in-vivo brain magnetic resonance current density imaging (MRCDI) , 2018, NeuroImage.

[39]  Ludovica Labruna,et al.  Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after‐effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation , 2017, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Cost of focality in TDCS: Interindividual variability in electric fields , 2020, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Three-dimensional head model Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  Zening Fu,et al.  Phase fMRI Reveals More Sparseness and Balance of Rest Brain Functional Connectivity Than Magnitude fMRI , 2019, Front. Neurosci..

[43]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[44]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of large-scale brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation evidenced by resting-state functional MRI , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[45]  Jingwei Sheng,et al.  MR imaging of oscillatory magnetic field changes: Progressing from phantom to human. , 2017, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[46]  D. Stegeman,et al.  Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model , 2014, Journal of neural engineering.

[47]  Michael Schär,et al.  Imaging of current flow in the human head during transcranial electrical therapy , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[48]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[49]  R. Buckner,et al.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  L. Parra,et al.  Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[51]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Battery powered thought: Enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation , 2014, NeuroImage.

[52]  Arindam Dutta,et al.  Using electromagnetic reciprocity and magnetic resonance current density imaging to fit multi-electrode montage for non-invasive brain stimulation , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[53]  Vince D Calhoun,et al.  Magnitude and phase behavior of multiresolution BOLD signal. , 2010, Concepts in magnetic resonance. Part B, Magnetic resonance engineering.

[54]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[55]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  Evaluation of the electric field in the brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: A sensitivity analysis , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[56]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Brain Stimulation in Poststroke Rehabilitation , 2007, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[57]  Kaundinya Gopinath,et al.  Resting-state fMRI reveals enhanced functional connectivity in spatial navigation networks after transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, Neuroscience Letters.