Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients.

PURPOSE It has been suggested that a considerable subset of patients currently classified as having ocular hypertension may have thicker than average corneas that result in an overestimation of the true intraocular pressure (IOP). As a consequence, ocular hypertension patients with greater corneal thickness may be at a lower risk for functional damage, such as that detected by short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of SWAP deficits in ocular hypertension patients and to correlate these findings with corneal thickness measurements in the same patients. DESIGN Cross-sectional observational study. METHODS Sixty-eight ocular hypertension patients with normal optic disks and 63 normal subjects were included in the study. All participants underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), SWAP, and central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymeter. Central corneal thickness measurements in ocular hypertension patients with abnormal visual field test results were compared with central corneal thickness measurements in ocular hypertension patients with normal visual field results. In addition, central corneal thickness measurements in ocular hypertension patients were compared with central corneal thickness measurements in normal subjects. RESULTS Sixteen of 68 patients with ocular hypertension (24%) demonstrated SWAP abnormalities, whereas four of 68 (6%) showed a deficit on SAP. The mean central corneal thickness in ocular hypertension patients with abnormal SWAP results was significantly lower than the mean central corneal thickness in ocular hypertension patients with normal SWAP results (545 +/- 25 microm vs 572 +/- 35 microm; P =.006). The mean central corneal thickness in the normal group was 557 +/- 33 microm. The mean central corneal thickness in ocular hypertension patients with normal SWAP results was significantly higher than in normal subjects (P =.02). There was no significant difference between mean central corneal thickness in normal subjects and in ocular hypertension patients with abnormal SWAP results (P =.19). CONCLUSIONS The patients classified as having ocular hypertension but with visual field loss detected by SWAP had significantly lower central corneal thickness measurements than the ocular hypertension patients with normal visual field results. These results suggest that central corneal thickness should be taken into account when assessing risk for the development of glaucomatous damage among ocular hypertension patients.

[1]  F. K. Hansen,et al.  ELEVATED TONOMETER READINGS CAUSED BY A THICK CORNEA , 1971, Acta ophthalmologica.

[2]  W. Argus,et al.  Ocular hypertension and central corneal thickness. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[3]  A. Mermoud,et al.  Corneal thickness in ocular hypertension, primary open-angle glaucoma, and normal tension glaucoma. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  I. Goldberg,et al.  A comparison of short wavelength automated perimetry with frequency doubling perimetry for the early detection of visual field loss in ocular hypertension , 2000, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[5]  P A Sample,et al.  Color perimetry for assessment of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1990, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[6]  R. Weinreb,et al.  Short-wavelength automated perimetry and motion automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  C. Johnson,et al.  Short-wavelength automated perimetry in low-, medium-, and high-risk ocular hypertensive eyes. Initial baseline results. , 1995, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  M. Doughty,et al.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. , 2000, Survey of ophthalmology.

[9]  J. Felius,et al.  Functional characteristics of blue-on-yellow perimetric thresholds in glaucoma. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  R. Stein,et al.  The effect of corneal thickness on applanation tonometry. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  P. Sample.  Short-wavelength automated perimetry: it’s role in the clinic and for understanding ganglion cell function , 2000, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[12]  P A Sample,et al.  Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk. , 1993, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  Blue-yellow perimetry in the detection of early glaucomatous damage , 1990, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[15]  A. Hofman,et al.  Distribution of central corneal thickness and its association with intraocular pressure: The Rotterdam Study. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  C. Johnson,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  P A Sample,et al.  Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  F. A. La Rosa,et al.  Central corneal thickness of Caucasians and African Americans in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous populations. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  J M Wild,et al.  Short wavelength automated perimetry. , 2001, Acta ophthalmologica.

[20]  V. Polo,et al.  Predictive value of short-wavelength automated perimetry: a 3-year follow-up study. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[21]  M. Whitacre,et al.  Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. , 1993, Survey of ophthalmology.

[22]  M. Kass.  The ocular hypertension treatment study. , 1994, Journal of glaucoma.

[23]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002 .

[24]  T. Cox,et al.  Central corneal thickness in normal, glaucomatous, and ocular hypertensive eyes. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  P A Sample,et al.  Short-wavelength automated perimetry and standard perimetry in the detection of progressive optic disc cupping. , 2000, Archives of ophthalmology.

[26]  J. Beiser,et al.  Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS). , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[27]  Hansen Fk.  A clinical study of the normal human central corneal thickness. , 1971 .

[28]  C. Johnson,et al.  Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[29]  N. Ehlers,et al.  APPLANATION TONOMETRY AND CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS , 1975, Acta ophthalmologica.

[30]  C. Erb,et al.  Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects. , 2002, Ophthalmology.

[31]  A J Adams,et al.  Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[32]  D. Hodge,et al.  INCREASED CORNEAL THICKNESS IN PATIENTS WITH OCULAR HYPERTENSION , 2001 .

[33]  R A Moses,et al.  Increased corneal thickness simulating elevated intraocular pressure. , 1978, Archives of ophthalmology.