Experimental evaluation of selected electronic document delivery systems

Reports results of research to test and analyse five different document delivery systems according to request and delivery times, costs, document quality, and coverage. The aim was to evaluate the success of the different systems according to these criteria and to assess their relative value for money. The systems tested were UMI ProQuest Direct, InfoTrac SearchBank, British Library inside, Elsevier Engineering Information EiText and the standard BLDSC service. Two sets of documents were used in the evaluation: one relating to business studies and the other to manufacturing engineering. The full-text database systems provided a more rapid service than e-mailed and faxed delivery options. BLDSC uses the slowest method of delivery. ProQuest Direct and SearchBank were generally reliable. Partial and fragmented delivery of documents was an occasional feature of EiText and British Library inside . The flat rate per document fee charged by BLDSC is at least three times cheaper than either EiText or British Library inside . BLDSC provides the most comprehensive coverage by far in the titles held and the range of subjects. SearchBank and ProQuest Direct offer the least number of titles, across a range of subjects which is broader than EiText but more limited than British Library services. Concludes that the standard BLDSC service still offers extremely good value for money if assessed on document quality, price and coverage. However, if demand for faster document delivery were to increase, then BLDSC would face greater competition albeit in a limited range of material.

[1]  S. Prowse.  Trends and developments in interlending and document delivery in the UK in 1997 , 1998 .

[2]  R. Waller,et al.  The typographic contribution to language Towards a model of typographic genres and their underlying structures , 1988 .

[3]  Graham P. Cornish.  Resourcing academic libraries : is IT the answer ? Electronic document delivery services , 1996 .

[4]  Debbie Orr,et al.  Unmediated document delivery and academic staff at Central Queensland University , 1996 .

[5]  Gunnar Wilsdorf.  Leihverkehr. Expreß-Fernleihe - Auf zu neuen Ufern? , 1996 .

[6]  P. Moran.  On the method of paired comparisons. , 1947, Biometrika.

[7]  Walt Crawford,et al.  Future Libraries: Dreams, Madness, and Reality , 1995 .

[8]  Frank B. Oliver.  End‐user document access, retrieval and delivery systems ‐ a developer’s tale , 1996 .

[9]  Keith Glavash.  Full-text retrieval for document delivery—a viable option? , 1994 .

[10]  Françoise Hébert.  Service quality: An unobtrusive investigation of interlibrary loan in large public libraries in Canada , 1994 .

[11]  C. Henry.  Future libraries: Dreams, madness, and reality , 1995 .

[12]  Maurice B. Line.  Draft definitions: Information and library needs, wants, demands and uses , 1974 .

[13]  Simon J. Bevan,et al.  BIODOC: access versus holdings in a university library , 1996 .

[14]  H. M. Mountifield.  Electronic current awareness service: a survival tool for the information age? , 1995 .

[15]  Roberta Pessah,et al.  Document Delivery: St. John's University's Experience with Full-Text Services. , 1995 .

[16]  Thomas L. Kilpatrick,et al.  Serial cuts and interlibrary loan: filling the gaps , 1996 .

[17]  Unisist.  Measuring the performance of document supply systems , 1987 .

[18]  Yem S. Fong.  The Value of Interlibrary Loan , 1997 .

[19]  Penny Dade,et al.  Electronic information and document delivery: final report on the pilot trial of the Uncover database , 1996 .

[20]  Mark T. Kinnucan,et al.  Modeling user′s preferences for document delivery , 1994 .

[21]  Maurice B. Line.  MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF DOCUMENT SUPPLY SYSTEMS , 1988 .

[22]  Pat Weaver-Meyers,et al.  Delivery Speed, Timeliness and Satisfaction: Patrons' Perceptions About ILL Service. , 1997 .

[23]  Maria Pia Carosella.  Document delivery beyond 2000. Proceedings of a Conference held at the British Library, September 1998 ... Ed. by A. Morris, N. Jacobs and E. Davies. London-Los Angeles, Taylor Graham, 1999 [8] + 188 p. [Italian review] , 2000 .