Group interactive network and behavioral patterns in online English-to-Chinese cooperative translation activity

Abstract This study investigated the group interactive network of students and the behavioral patterns of knowledge construction in online cooperative translation activities without teacher intervention. Participants in this study consisted of 48 EFL learners from a Chinese university who major in educational technology. The following are determined by combining the methods of social network analysis and lag sequence analysis: (1) The group interactive network generated in this activity was reciprocal and balanced, and high cohesiveness and tight interaction relationship exist among groups. (2) In different cooperation phases, the behavioral sequences of knowledge construction of students presented different characteristics. (3) The behavioral sequences between the high-score groups and low-score groups also showed distinct differences. In addition, this study also revealed certain problems in cooperative translation, such as uneven contribution and unrelated chats. Finally, some implications for specialized English translation instruction, the limitations, and future research plan were presented.

[1]  Kristine Nagel,et al.  Intra-group and intergroup: an exploration of learning with complementary collaboration tools , 1997, CSCL.

[2]  Huei-Tse Hou,et al.  Exploring the behavioral patterns of learners in an educational massively multiple online role-playing game (MMORPG) , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Helena Ahonen-Myka,et al.  Simple Semantics in Topic Detection and Tracking , 2004, Information Retrieval.

[4]  YU Sheng-quan The Effect of Primary Chinese Teachers’ Collaborative Lesson Planning Supported by the Learning-Cell system——Based on the Method of Content Analysis , 2013 .

[5]  Allen C. Johnston,et al.  Social network analysis in accounting information systems research , 2013, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Olivier Serrat Social Network Analysis , 2009 .

[7]  Chih-Kai Chang,et al.  A mobile-assisted synchronously collaborative translation–annotation system for English as a foreign language (EFL) reading comprehension , 2011 .

[8]  Barry D. Davidson,et al.  Social networks, communication styles, and learning performance in a CSCL community , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Minjuan Wang,et al.  From Learning Object to Learning Cell: A Resource Organization Model for Ubiquitous Learning , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  Issy Yuliasri COOPERATIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ TRANSLATION , 2014 .

[11]  Clark Hu,et al.  Visual representation of knowledge networks: A social network analysis of hospitality research domain , 2008 .

[12]  Yueh-Min Huang,et al.  Social Learning Networks: Build Mobile Learning Networks Based on Collaborative Services , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A spreadsheet-based visualized Mindtool for improving students’ learning performance in identifying relationships between numerical variables , 2015, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[14]  I K Hawks,et al.  Facilitativeness in Small Groups: A Process-Oriented Study Using Lag Sequential Analysis , 1987, Psychological reports.

[15]  Roger Bakeman,et al.  Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis , 1986 .

[16]  MA Cai-ling On the Application of the Standpoint "Teaching Benefits the Teacher and Students Alike" to SBE Translation , 2011 .

[17]  Sheng-Yi Wu,et al.  Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Helen S. Du,et al.  Learning With Weblogs: Enhancing Cognitive and Social Knowledge Construction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[19]  Tao Gu-si Experimental Research on an Anticipatory Autonomous Learning and Comprehensive Teaching Model for Major English Intensive Reading at Chinese Normal Colleges , 2008 .

[20]  Yao-Ting Sung,et al.  An Analysis of Peer Assessment Online Discussions within a Course that uses Project-based Learning , 2007, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[21]  Posen Liao,et al.  EFL Learners’ Beliefs about and Strategy Use of Translation in English Learning , 2006 .

[22]  R. Burt The Social Structure of Competition , 2004 .

[23]  Karen Stepanyan,et al.  Culture, role and group work: A social network analysis perspective on an online collaborative course , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[24]  Shengquan Yu,et al.  The effect of collaborative annotation on Chinese reading level in primary schools in China , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[25]  Matsuko Woo,et al.  Using a Wiki to Scaffold Primary-School Students' Collaborative Writing , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[26]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  Special Issue Preface - Intelligent Agents for Educational Computer-Aided Systems , 1999 .

[27]  Kenneth Tobin,et al.  Questions and Answers about Radical Constructivism , 2012 .

[28]  R. Driver,et al.  Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into children’s ideas , 1993 .

[29]  Spencer Kagan We Can Talk: Cooperative Learning in the Elementary ESL Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1995 .

[30]  Ching-Ying Pan,et al.  The Cooperative Learning Effects on English Reading Comprehension and Learning Motivation of EFL Freshmen. , 2013 .

[31]  Douglas Allchin,et al.  Values in Science: An Educational Perspective , 1999 .

[32]  C. Haythornthwaite Social network analysis: An approach and technique for the study of information exchange☆ , 1996 .

[33]  Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Foreign Language Anxiety and Learning Style , 1999 .

[34]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Choi Jae-woo,et al.  Themes and Trends in Korean Educational Technology Research: A Social Network Analysis of Keywords★ , 2014 .

[36]  Ronald D. Zellner,et al.  The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Zhang Jing Study on Teaching Mode of English Translation of TCM Based on Blackboard Network Platform , 2012 .

[38]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[39]  Dawn Bikowski,et al.  COLLABORATIVE WRITING AMONG SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS IN ACADEMIC WEB-BASED PROJECTS , 2012 .

[40]  Allyson Hadwin,et al.  Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Youngsoo Kim,et al.  Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[42]  L. Katz,et al.  Measurement of the Tendency Toward Reciprocation of Choice , 1955 .

[43]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[44]  C. Y. Fook,et al.  Patterns of Interaction among ESL Students During Online Collaboration , 2014 .

[45]  Craig H. Martell,et al.  Topic Detection and Extraction in Chat , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing.

[46]  Pei-Wei Tsai,et al.  Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Mohsen Zahedi,et al.  The Effect of Collaborative Learning on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Oral Skills and Motivation , 2012 .

[48]  A. Alton-Lee,et al.  Predicting Learning From Student Experience of Teaching: A Theory of Student Knowledge Construction in Classrooms , 1993 .

[49]  Scott Counts,et al.  Predicting the Speed, Scale, and Range of Information Diffusion in Twitter , 2010, ICWSM.

[50]  R. Noe,et al.  Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Knowledge Management Systems , 2014 .

[51]  Shengquan Yu,et al.  Effects of cooperative translation on Chinese EFL student levels of interest and self-efficacy in specialized English translation , 2016 .

[52]  Barbara Dragsted,et al.  Coordination of reading and writing processes in translation , 2010 .

[53]  António Moreira,et al.  Assessing social construction of knowledge online: A critique of the interaction analysis model , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..