UNISON analysis to model and reduce step-and-scan overlay errors for semiconductor manufacturing

Semiconductor industry has been one of the most complicated industries driven by Moore’s Law for continuous technology evolution. In order to meet the requirements of high resolution and alignment accuracy, the lithography equipments have been advanced from step-and-repeat system to step-and-scan system. As the tolerance of linewidths is becoming tight and slight, overlay errors must be controlled within the tolerance to maintain the yield. In particular, overlay errors can be compensated by modifying the corresponding equipment setup parameters. However, little research has been done to deal with overlay errors of the step-and-scan system. This study aimed to develop a modeling and decision analysis framework in which the overlay error model for step-and-scan system was constructed and the optimal sampling strategy for measuring and compensating the overlay errors was thus designed. Furthermore, we validated the proposed model and sampling strategy by empirical studies conducted in a fab. We compared the proposed sampling strategy with alternative sampling strategies including the existing sampling strateg based on the model adequacy of R-squares and the model effectiveness of residual errors. The results demonstrated the practical viability of the proposed approach.

[1]  Gregg M. Gallatin,et al.  Micrascan II overlay error analysis , 1994, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  Joseph C. Pellegrini,et al.  Supersparse overlay sampling plans: an evaluation of methods and algorithms for optimizing overlay quality control and metrology tool throughput , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[3]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  Design of a sampling strategy for measuring and compensating for overlay errors in semiconductor manufacturing , 2003 .

[4]  Jere D. Buckley,et al.  Step And Scan: A Systems Overview Of A New Lithography Tool , 1989, Advanced Lithography.

[5]  Zone-Ching Lin,et al.  Multiple linear regression analysis of the overlay accuracy model , 1999, ICMTS 1999.

[6]  Jan B. van Schoot,et al.  0.7-NA DUV step-and-scan system for 150-nm imaging with improved overlay , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  James S. Lekas,et al.  Overlay sample plan optimization for the detection of higher order contributions to misalignment , 1994 .

[8]  Han-Ku Cho,et al.  Optimization of Sample Plan for Overlay and Alignment Accuracy Improvement , 1999 .

[9]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  Analyzing repair decisions in the site imbalance problem of semiconductor test machines , 2003 .

[10]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  Modeling strategic semiconductor assembly outsourcing decisions based on empirical settings , 2008, OR Spectr..

[11]  M. A. van den Brink,et al.  Matching Performance For Multiple Wafer Steppers Using An Advanced Metrology Procedure , 1988, Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Shengwei Ding,et al.  Economic Efficiency Analysis of Wafer Fabrication , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[13]  Jan Baselmans,et al.  Performance of a step-and-scan system for DUV lithography , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  Harry J. Levinson,et al.  Minimization of total overlay errors on product wafers using an advanced optimization scheme , 1997, Advanced Lithography.

[15]  Harry Sewell Step and scan: the maturing technology , 1995, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  A novel method for determining machine subgroups and backups with an empirical study for semiconductor manufacturing , 2006, J. Intell. Manuf..

[17]  Steve D. Slonaker,et al.  Step-and-scan and step-and-repeat: a technology comparison , 1996, Advanced Lithography.

[18]  Don MacMillen,et al.  Analysis Of Image Field Placement Deviations Of A 5x Microlithographic Reduction Lens , 1982, Advanced Lithography.

[19]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  A UNISON framework for analyzing alternative strategies of IC final testing for enhancing overall operational effectiveness , 2007 .

[20]  Alec B. Scranton,et al.  Optimal sampling strategies for sub-100-nm overlay , 1998, Advanced Lithography.