Perceptual influences of error size on voluntary force control during a compound sinusoidal force task.

Visual feedback that provides error information is critical to task quality and motor adjustments. This study investigated how the size of perceived errors via visual feedback affected rate control and force gradation strategy of a designate force task. Fourteen young adults coupled force exertions to a compound sinusoidal signal (0.2 Hz and 0.5 Hz) that fluctuated around a mean level of 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, when the size of execution errors were differently scaled with the error amplification factors. In the low (LAF) and high (HAF) amplification factor conditions, the execution errors in the visual display half and double of the real errors, respectively. The visualized error was the real errors in the medium amplification factor (MAF) condition. In addition to a phase-lead of force output, the LAF condition that virtually reduced the size of error feedback associated with a poorer task accuracy than the MAF and HAF conditions. Virtual increase in error size of visual feedback selectively suppressed the fast target force at 0.5 Hz. In addition, complexity and high-frequency components (>0.75 Hz) of force outputs multiplied progressively with increasing error size. Error-enhancing feedback suppressed fast target force, accentuating the use of error information to tune force output, whereas error-reducing feedback enhanced fast target force in favor of predictive force control.

[1]  David E Vaillancourt,et al.  Selective regions of the visuomotor system are related to gain-induced changes in force error. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Pamela S. Haibach,et al.  Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Electroencephalographic correlates of target and outcome errors , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  I. Hwang,et al.  Kinematic property of target motion conditions gaze behavior and eye-hand synergy during manual tracking. , 2013, Human movement science.

[5]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Error Augmentation Enhancing Arm Recovery in Individuals With Chronic Stroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[7]  Sae Franklin,et al.  Visuomotor feedback gains upregulate during the learning of novel dynamics , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  T. Agostini,et al.  The effects of two different correction strategies on the snatch technique in weightlifting , 2017, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  D. Vaillancourt,et al.  Transient shifts in frontal and parietal circuits scale with enhanced visual feedback and changes in force variability and error. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  K. Newell,et al.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  K. Fukushima,et al.  Predictive responses of periarcuate pursuit neurons to visual target motion , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Madalena Costa,et al.  Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[13]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Regularity of force tremor in Parkinson's disease , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Robert A. Scheidt,et al.  Visuomotor Learning Enhanced by Augmenting Instantaneous Trajectory Error Feedback during Reaching , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  M. Missal,et al.  Quantitative analysis of catch-up saccades during sustained pursuit. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  I. Hwang,et al.  Alterations in Neural Control of Constant Isometric Contraction with the Size of Error Feedback , 2017, PloS one.

[17]  Eli Carmeli,et al.  Error augmentation as a possible technique for improving upper extremity motor performance after a stroke – a systematic review , 2016, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[18]  G. Barnes,et al.  Cognitive processes involved in smooth pursuit eye movements , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  Evangelos A. Christou,et al.  Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  K. Newell,et al.  Visual information gain and the regulation of constant force levels , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  I. Hwang,et al.  Rate control and quality assurance during rhythmic force tracking , 2014, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  S. Pasalar,et al.  Effects of speeds and force fields on submovements during circular manual tracking in humans , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  R. Miall,et al.  Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[24]  K. Newell,et al.  Intermittent visual information and the multiple time scales of visual motor control of continuous isometric force production , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  K. Newell,et al.  Independence between the amount and structure of variability at low force levels , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  J. Easterbrook The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[27]  T. Agostini,et al.  Correction of a Technical Error in the Golf Swing: Error Amplification Versus Direct Instruction , 2016, Journal of motor behavior.

[28]  Karl M Newell,et al.  Aging and the time and frequency structure of force output variability. , 2003, Journal of applied physiology.

[29]  Michael A. Riley,et al.  Spatial resolution of visual feedback affects variability and structure of isometric force , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[30]  I. Hwang,et al.  Paradigm Shifts in Voluntary Force Control and Motor Unit Behaviors with the Manipulated Size of Visual Error Perception , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[31]  Arthur D Kuo,et al.  The relative roles of feedforward and feedback in the control of rhythmic movements. , 2002, Motor control.

[32]  R. Gentili,et al.  Functional near-infrared spectroscopy-based correlates of prefrontal cortical dynamics during a cognitive-motor executive adaptation task , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[33]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Holger Hill Modulation of frontal and parietal neuronal activity by visuomotor learning. An ERP analysis of implicit and explicit pursuit tracking tasks. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[35]  R. Miall,et al.  Manual tracking of visual targets by trained monkeys , 1986, Behavioural Brain Research.