Elements of power: Material-political entanglements in Australia's fossil fuel hegemony

Anthropocentric climate change presents an existential threat through impacts such as rising sea levels, effects on agricultural crops and extreme weather events. However, governments, businesses and communities struggle to wean off fossil fuel dependency. In this article, we argue that this is due to the grip of fossil fuel hegemony. To explain this grip, we draw on the theoretical perspectives of new materialism to examine how fossil fuels and politics interact in upholding Australia's fossil fuel regime. Our analysis, based on 70 qualitative interviews conducted with politicians and political advisors, fossil fuel executives and experts and environmental activists, shows three processes – establishment, entrenchment and encroachment – through which political-material entanglements lock in a fossil fuel-based future. These processes are both discursive, with politicians and industry downplaying, if not outright denying, the climate emergency and material, with investment in new mines and infrastructure even while the negative ecological impacts of fossil fuel use gather pace.

[1]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Organising Responses to Climate Change , 2022 .

[2]  D. Frierson,et al.  Estimating the timing of geophysical commitment to 1.5 and 2.0 °C of global warming , 2022, Nature Climate Change.

[3]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Beyond the discourse of denial: The reproduction of fossil fuel hegemony in Australia , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[4]  N. Fox,et al.  Doing new materialist data analysis: a Spinozo-Deleuzian ethological toolkit , 2021, International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

[5]  P. Newell Race and the politics of energy transitions , 2021, Energy Research & Social Science.

[6]  Takashi Yamagata,et al.  Assessing the impact of COVID-19 on global fossil fuel consumption and CO2 emissions , 2020, Energy Economics.

[7]  C. O’faircheallaigh Explaining outcomes from negotiated agreements in Australia and Canada , 2020 .

[8]  Henner Busch,et al.  Of pipe dreams and fossil fools: Advancing Canadian fossil fuel hegemony through the Trans Mountain pipeline , 2020 .

[9]  Elizabeth Havice,et al.  Extraction, entanglements, and (im)materialities: Reflections on the methods and methodologies of natural resource industries fieldwork , 2020, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space.

[10]  R. Vautard,et al.  Attribution of the Australian bushfire risk to anthropogenic climate change , 2020, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.

[11]  Nicholas Beuret Containing climate change: The new governmental strategies of catastrophic environments , 2020 .

[12]  N. Fox,et al.  Re-assembling climate change policy: Materialism, posthumanism, and the policy assemblage. , 2020, The British journal of sociology.

[13]  D. Blockley Making , 2020, The Hidden History of the Smock Frock.

[14]  Gustav Cederlöf Out of steam: Energy, materiality, and political ecology , 2019, Progress in Human Geography.

[15]  Charles Roche,et al.  Extractive Dispossession: “I am not happy our land will go, we will have no better life” , 2019, The Extractive Industries and Society.

[16]  R. Lawrence,et al.  Accumulating Minerals and Dispossessing Indigenous Australians: Native Title Recognition as Settler‐Colonialism , 2019, Antipode.

[17]  S. Spiegel,et al.  Coal, Climate Justice, and the Cultural Politics of Energy Transition , 2019, Global Environmental Politics.

[18]  Lorenzo Veracini Settler Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview , 2010 .

[19]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Fracking the Future: The Temporal Portability of Frames in Political Contests , 2018, Organization Studies.

[20]  T. Lequesne Petro-hegemony and the matrix of resistance: What can Standing Rock’s Water Protectors teach us about organizing for climate justice in the United States? , 2018, Environmental Sociology.

[21]  Jeremy Walker,et al.  On mineral sovereignty: Towards a political theory of geological power , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[22]  Arianne Conty,et al.  The Politics of Nature: New Materialist Responses to the Anthropocene , 2018, Theory, Culture & Society.

[23]  T. Luke Tracing race, ethnicity, and civilization in the Anthropocene , 2018, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space.

[24]  Nathaniel Otjen Inscriptive energetics: climate change, energy, inscription , 2018, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[25]  K. Whyte Settler Colonialism, Ecology, and Environmental Injustice , 2018, Environment and Society.

[26]  Hannah Della Bosca,et al.  The coal story: Generational coal mining communities and strategies of energy transition in Australia , 2018, Energy Policy.

[27]  Sean Parson,et al.  Sustainable Colonization: Tar Sands as Resource Colonialism , 2018 .

[28]  Begüm Özkaynak,et al.  Energy infrastructure and the fate of the nation: Introduction to special issue , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[29]  L. Rickards,et al.  Battling the tropics to settle a nation: Negotiating multiple energies, frontiers and feedback loops in Australia , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[30]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Dash for Gas: Climate Change, Hegemony and the Scalar Politics of Fracking in the UK , 2018 .

[31]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  Co-production in global sustainability: Histories and theories , 2018 .

[32]  Cameron Harrington,et al.  Entangling carbon lock-in: India’s coal constituency , 2017 .

[33]  M. Hudson Wind beneath their contempt: Why Australian policymakers oppose solar and wind energy , 2017 .

[34]  Wim Carton Dancing to the Rhythms of the Fossil Fuel Landscape: Landscape Inertia and the Temporal Limits to Market‐Based Climate Policy , 2017 .

[35]  Anne Galletta,et al.  Mastering the Semi-Structured Interview and Beyond , 2017 .

[36]  J. Verhoeven,et al.  The legacy of surface mining: Remediation, restoration, reclamation and rehabilitation , 2016 .

[37]  H. Baer The nexus of the coal industry and the state in Australia: Historical dimensions and contemporary challenges , 2016 .

[38]  A. Richardson How climate change makes me feel , 2016 .

[39]  N. Fox,et al.  New materialist social inquiry: designs, methods and the research-assemblage , 2015 .

[40]  Clark A. Miller,et al.  Science and democracy: making knowledge and making power in the biosciences and beyond , 2015 .

[41]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power , 2015 .

[42]  I. Hodder The Entanglements of Humans and Things: A Long-Term View , 2014 .

[43]  Joel A Tarr,et al.  Toxic Legacy: The Environmental Impact of the Manufactured Gas Industry in the United States , 2014, Technology and culture.

[44]  Kathryn Yusoff Geologic Life: Prehistory, Climate, Futures in the Anthropocene , 2013 .

[45]  David L. Levy,et al.  Contested imaginaries and the cultural political economy of climate change , 2013 .

[46]  Gail Whiteman,et al.  Future imaginings: organizing in response to climate change , 2013 .

[47]  D. Nyberg,et al.  Incorporating citizens: corporate political engagement with climate change in Australia , 2013 .

[48]  David Grant,et al.  “Hippies on the third floor”: Climate Change, Narrative Identity and the Micro-Politics of Corporate Environmentalism , 2012 .

[49]  P. Harvey,et al.  The Enchantments of Infrastructure , 2012 .

[50]  R. Dolphijn,et al.  New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies , 2012 .

[51]  Marcia Langton,et al.  Community futures, legal architecture : foundations for indigenous peoples in the global mining boom , 2012 .

[52]  G. Bridge Resource geographies 1 , 2011 .

[53]  Vincenzo Balzani,et al.  The legacy of fossil fuels. , 2011, Chemistry, an Asian journal.

[54]  H. Matthews,et al.  Future CO2 Emissions and Climate Change from Existing Energy Infrastructure , 2010, Science.

[55]  Catherine Nash,et al.  Geopower: A Panel on Elizabeth Grosz's Chaos, Territory, Art: Deleuze and the Framing of the Earth , 2012 .

[56]  P. Wolfe Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native , 2006 .

[57]  S. Jasanoff States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .