Combining industrial ecology tools to assess potential greenhouse gas reductions of a circular economy: Method development and application to Switzerland

Industrial ecology (IE) methodologies, such as input/output or material flow analysis and life cycle assessment (LCA), are often used for the environmental evaluation of circular economy strategies. Up to now, an approach that utilizes these methods in a systematic, integrated framework for a holistic assessment of a geographic region's sustainable circular economy potential has been lacking. The approach developed in this study (IE4CE approach) combines IE methodologies to determine the environmental impact mitigation potential of circular economy strategies for a defined geographic region. The approach foresees five steps. First, input/output analysis helps identify sectors with high environmental impacts. Second, a refined analysis is conducted using material flow and LCA. In step 3, circular strategies are used for scenario design and evaluated in step 4. In step 5, the assessment results are compiled and compared across sectors. The approach was applied to a case study of Switzerland, analyzing 8 sectors and more than 30 scenarios in depth. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) from waste incineration, biogas and cement production, food waste prevention in households, hospitality and production, and the increased recycling of plastics had the highest mitigation potential. Most of the scenarios do not influence each other. One exception is the CCS scenarios: waste avoidance scenarios decrease the reduction potential of CCS. A combination of scenarios from different sectors, including their impact on the CCS scenario potential, led to an environmental impact mitigation potential of 11.9 Mt CO2‐eq for 2050, which equals 14% of Switzerland's current consumption‐based impacts.

[1]  Rhythima Shinde,et al.  Turning trash into treasure: An approach to the environmental assessment of waste prevention and its application to clothing and furniture in Switzerland , 2022, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[2]  M. Klotz,et al.  A high-resolution dataset on the plastic material flows in Switzerland , 2022, Data in brief.

[3]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Limited utilization options for secondary plastics may restrict their circularity. , 2022, Waste management.

[4]  S. Pfister,et al.  Growing environmental footprint of plastics driven by coal combustion , 2021, Nature Sustainability.

[5]  R. Hischier,et al.  Factors Allowing Users to Influence the Environmental Performance of Their T-Shirt , 2021, Sustainability.

[6]  T. Wiedmann,et al.  Quantifying carbon flows in Switzerland: top-down meets bottom-up modelling , 2020 .

[7]  A. Björklund,et al.  Environmental assessment of a product-service system for renting electric-powered tools , 2020 .

[8]  T. Astrup,et al.  Dynamic Material Flow Analysis of PET, PE, and PP Flows in Europe: Evaluation of the Potential for Circular Economy. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  C. Bening,et al.  Why “Circular” doesn't always mean “Sustainable” , 2020 .

[10]  T. Wiedmann,et al.  A two-stage clustering approach to investigate lifestyle carbon footprints in two Australian cities , 2020, Environmental Research Letters.

[11]  J. Fellner,et al.  Potentials for a circular economy of mineral construction materials and demolition waste in urban areas: a case study from Vienna , 2020 .

[12]  S. Olsen,et al.  Using a gate-to-gate LCA to apply circular economy principles to a food processing SME , 2020 .

[13]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  A framework for sustainable and circular system design: Development and application on thermal insulation materials , 2020 .

[14]  Arnold Tukker,et al.  Modeling the circular economy in environmentally extended input-output tables: Methods, software and case study , 2020, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[15]  J. Vermaire,et al.  Microplastics in Freshwater Ecosystems , 2020 .

[16]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Machine learning based modeling of households: A regionalized bottom‐up approach to investigate consumption‐induced environmental impacts , 2019, Journal of Industrial Ecology.

[17]  O. Hoegh-Guldberg,et al.  The human imperative of stabilizing global climate change at 1.5°C , 2019, Science.

[18]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Measuring the environmental sustainability of a circular economy , 2019, Environmental and Sustainability Indicators.

[19]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Potential environmental benefits from food waste prevention in the food service sector , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[20]  T. Rydberg,et al.  Combining material flow analysis with life cycle assessment to identify environmental hotspots of urban consumption , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[21]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? , 2019, Resources, conservation, and recycling.

[22]  Richard Wood,et al.  Global Circular Economy Scenario in a Multiregional Input-Output Framework. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Florian Lüdeke-Freund,et al.  A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns , 2019 .

[24]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Tracking Construction Material over Space and Time: Prospective and Geo‐referenced Modeling of Building Stocks and Construction Material Flows , 2019 .

[25]  F. Krausmann,et al.  Measuring Progress towards a Circular Economy: A Monitoring Framework for Economy‐wide Material Loop Closing in the EU28 , 2018, Journal of industrial ecology.

[26]  Gustav A Sandin,et al.  Environmental assessment of Swedish clothing consumption - six garments, sustainable futures , 2019 .

[27]  Nynne Nørup.  An environmental assessment of the collection, reuse, recycling and disposal of clothing and household textile waste , 2019 .

[28]  C. Beretta.  Environmental Assessment of Food Losses and Reduction Potential in Food Value Chains , 2018 .

[29]  O. Thees,et al.  Valorization of an untapped resource: Energy and greenhouse gas emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas through anaerobic digestion , 2018, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[30]  Sebastian Rüter,et al.  A Methodical Approach for Systematic Life Cycle Assessment of Wood‐Based Furniture , 2018 .

[31]  S Hellweg,et al.  Is there an environmentally optimal separate collection rate? , 2018, Waste management.

[32]  E. Iacovidou,et al.  Closing the loop on plastic packaging materials: What is quality and how does it affect their circularity? , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Using Data Mining To Assess Environmental Impacts of Household Consumption Behaviors. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Ben Amor,et al.  Is open-loop recycling the lowest preference in a circular economy? Answering through LCA of glass powder in concrete , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Modular life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management. , 2018, Waste management.

[36]  Renato Lemm,et al.  Analyzing the potential of domestic biomass resources for the energy transition in Switzerland , 2018 .

[37]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Environmentally optimal wood use in Switzerland—Investigating the relevance of material cascades , 2018 .

[38]  W. Vermeulen,et al.  The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[39]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions , 2017 .

[40]  R. Geyer,et al.  Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made , 2017, Science Advances.

[41]  Jonathan M. Cullen,et al.  Taking the Circularity to the Next Level: A Special Issue on the Circular Economy , 2017 .

[42]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Do We Have the Right Performance Indicators for the Circular Economy?: Insight into the Swiss Waste Management System , 2017 .

[43]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  New multi-regional input–output databases for Australia – enabling timely and flexible regional analysis , 2017 .

[44]  Melanie Haupt,et al.  How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016 , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[45]  David Laner,et al.  Material Cycles and Chemicals: Dynamic Material Flow Analysis of Contaminants in Paper Recycling. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  David Cheshire,et al.  Building Revolutions: Applying the Circular Economy to the Built Environment , 2016 .

[47]  A. Curran.  Extending Product Life-Spans: Household Furniture and Appliance Reuse in the UK , 2016 .

[48]  ThE CirCUlAr,et al.  EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy , 2016 .

[49]  F. Krausmann,et al.  How Circular is the Global Economy?: An Assessment of Material Flows, Waste Production, and Recycling in the European Union and the World in 2005 , 2015 .

[50]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Beyond the throwaway society: A life cycle‐based assessment of the environmental benefit of reuse , 2015, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[51]  Shenghui Cui,et al.  Tracking urban carbon footprints from production and consumption perspectives , 2015 .

[52]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[53]  A Dick Vethaak,et al.  Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know , 2014, Environmental Sciences Europe.

[54]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment , 2014, Science.

[55]  Joo Young Park,et al.  Establishing and testing the "reuse potential" indicator for managing wastes as resources. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[56]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  BUILDING EORA: A GLOBAL MULTI-REGION INPUT–OUTPUT DATABASE AT HIGH COUNTRY AND SECTOR RESOLUTION , 2013 .

[57]  E. Sanyé-Mengual,et al.  Comparative LCA of recycled and conventional concrete for structural applications , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[58]  M. Rillig.  Microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems and the soil? , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  Tom Quested,et al.  Food and drink waste from households in the UK , 2011 .

[60]  Mohan Yellishetty,et al.  Environmental life-cycle comparisons of steel production and recycling: Sustainability issues, problems and prospects , 2011 .

[61]  A. Ramaswami,et al.  Two approaches to greenhouse gas emissions foot-printing at the city scale. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[62]  T. Wiedmann.  EDITORIAL: CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS – AN INTRODUCTION , 2009 .

[63]  J. Minx,et al.  INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS , 2009 .

[64]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[65]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[66]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Waste‐Solvent Treatment Options , 2007 .

[67]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[68]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide , 2006 .

[69]  J. Prins.  Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2006 .

[70]  B. Richards,et al.  Synthetic fibers as an indicator of land application of sludge. , 2005, Environmental pollution.

[71]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[72]  John R. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Can Industrial Ecology be the “Science of Sustainability”? , 2004 .

[73]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Materials and energy flows in industry and ecosystem netwoks : life cycle assessment, input-output analysis, material flow analysis, ecological network flow analysis, and their combinations for industrial ecology , 2004 .

[74]  P. Brunner,et al.  Methodology of MFA , 2003 .

[75]  Helmut Rechberger,et al.  Practical handbook of material flow analysis , 2003 .

[76]  Christian Capello,et al.  Environmentally Preferable Treatment Options for Industrial Waste Solvent Management: A Case Study of a Toluene Containing Waste Solvent , 2003 .

[77]  A. Weale.  Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2003 .

[78]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Embedded Case Study Methods , 2002 .

[79]  Thomas E. Graedel,et al.  ON THE CONCEPT OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[80]  C K Patel,et al.  Industrial ecology. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.