Identifying latent behavioral states in animal movement with non-parametric Bayesian methods

Understanding animal movement often relies upon telemetry and biologging devices. These data are frequently used to estimate latent behavioral states to help understand why animals move across the landscape (or seascape). While there are a variety of methods that make behavioral inference from biotelemetry data, some features of these methods (e.g., analysis of a single data stream, use of parametric distributions) may result in the misclassification of behavioral states. We address some of the limitations of segmentation and state-space models (SSMs) in our non-parametric Bayesian framework, available within the open-source R package bayesmove. This framework can analyze multiple data streams, which may capture complex behaviors more successfully than a single data stream. Additionally, parametric distributions are not used in our framework since they may poorly characterize the underlying true distributions. We tested our Bayesian framework using simulated trajectories and compared model performance against a representative segmentation method (behavioral change point analysis; BCPA) and one type of SSM, a hidden Markov model (HMM). We also illustrated this Bayesian framework using movements of juvenile snail kites (Rostrhamus sociabilis) in Florida, USA. The Bayesian framework estimated breakpoints more accurately than BCPA for tracks of different lengths, albeit at a slower computational speed. Likewise, the Bayesian framework provided more accurate estimates of behavior than the HMM when simulations were generated from atypical distributions. This framework also performed up to three times faster than the HMM when run in a similar fashion. Three behavioral states were estimated from snail kite movements, which were labeled as ‘encamped’, ‘area-restricted search’, and ‘transit’. Changes in these behaviors over time were associated with known dispersal events from the nest site, as well as movements to and from possible breeding locations. Our framework estimated behavioral states with comparable or superior accuracy compared to BCPA and HMM when step lengths and turning angles of simulations were generated from atypical distributions. Since empirical data can be complex and do not necessarily conform to parametric distributions, methods (such as our Bayesian framework) that can flexibly classify latent behavioral states will become increasingly important to address questions in movement ecology.

[1]  Ronan Fablet,et al.  Hidden Markov Models: The Best Models for Forager Movements? , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Spline‐based nonparametric inference in general state‐switching models , 2018 .

[3]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[4]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  Correlated velocity models as a fundamental unit of animal movement: synthesis and applications , 2017, Movement ecology.

[5]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[6]  Denis Valle,et al.  Non-Parametric Bayesian Analyses of Animal Movement [R package bayesmove version 0.1.0] , 2020 .

[7]  Christopher Holmes,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Nonlinear Classification and Regressing , 2002 .

[8]  R. Chazdon,et al.  Decomposing biodiversity data using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model, a probabilistic multivariate statistical method , 2014, Ecology letters.

[9]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Scott A. McKinley,et al.  Hidden semi-Markov models reveal multiphasic movement of the endangered Florida panther. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[11]  Stephen Pain,et al.  What is an Animal? , 2009, Biosemiotics.

[12]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Assessing the Value of Novel Habitats to Snail Kites through Foraging Behavior and Nest Survival , 2016 .

[13]  Christopher C Wilmers,et al.  The golden age of bio-logging: how animal-borne sensors are advancing the frontiers of ecology. , 2015, Ecology.

[14]  Ian Jonsen,et al.  Joint estimation over multiple individuals improves behavioural state inference from animal movement data , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[15]  James Owen Drife,et al.  A golden age , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  Scott A. Sisson,et al.  Transdimensional Markov Chains , 2005 .

[17]  Jennifer Pohle,et al.  Selecting the Number of States in Hidden Markov Models: Pragmatic Solutions Illustrated Using Animal Movement , 2017 .

[18]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  Optimising the use of bio-loggers for movement ecology research. , 2019, The Journal of animal ecology.

[19]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  What is the animal doing? Tools for exploring behavioural structure in animal movements. , 2016, The Journal of animal ecology.

[20]  Julien Martin,et al.  Multiscale patterns of movement in fragmented landscapes and consequences on demography of the snail kite in Florida. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[21]  Niko Balkenhol,et al.  Path segmentation for beginners: an overview of current methods for detecting changes in animal movement patterns , 2016, Movement ecology.

[22]  K. Parkes,et al.  Birds Of The World , 1929 .

[23]  R. Fletcher,et al.  Counteracting effects of a non-native prey on the demography of a native predator culminate in positive population growth. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  Ecological metrics and methods for GPS movement data , 2018, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Robert J Fletcher,et al.  Affinity for natal environments by dispersers impacts reproduction and explains geographical structure of a highly mobile bird , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  P. Green Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination , 1995 .

[27]  M. Whitford,et al.  An overview of behavioral, physiological, and environmental sensors used in animal biotelemetry and biologging studies , 2019, Animal Biotelemetry.

[28]  Ellen P. Robertson,et al.  The causes of dispersal and the cost of carry‐over effects for an endangered bird in a dynamic wetland landscape , 2017, The Journal of animal ecology.

[29]  R Patin,et al.  Identifying stationary phases in multivariate time-series for highlighting behavioural modes and home range settlements. , 2019, The Journal of animal ecology.

[30]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Flexible and practical modeling of animal telemetry data: hidden Markov models and extensions. , 2012, Ecology.

[31]  Stephen Knight,et al.  The golden age , 2003 .

[32]  J. Månsson,et al.  Using fine-scale movement patterns to infer ungulate parturition , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[33]  Ian D. Jonsen,et al.  ROBUST STATE-SPACE MODELING OF ANIMAL MOVEMENT DATA , 2005 .

[34]  Hartwig H. Hochmair,et al.  Individual Movement Strategies Revealed through Novel Clustering of Emergent Movement Patterns , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[35]  W. Kitchens,et al.  Factors influencing movement probabilities of a nomadic food specialist: proximate foraging benefits or ultimate gains from exploration? , 2000 .

[36]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[37]  Roland Langrock,et al.  moveHMM: an R package for the statistical modelling of animal movement data using hidden Markov models , 2016 .

[38]  Michael Li,et al.  Incorporating periodic variability in hidden Markov models for animal movement , 2017, Movement ecology.

[39]  Roland Langrock,et al.  Statistical modelling of individual animal movement: an overview of key methods and a discussion of practical challenges , 2016, AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis.

[40]  Jonathan R. Potts,et al.  Finding turning‐points in ultra‐high‐resolution animal movement data , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

[41]  J. Kocik,et al.  Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.

[42]  Brett T. McClintock,et al.  momentuHMM: R package for generalized hidden Markov models of animal movement , 2017, 1710.03786.

[43]  A. Ford,et al.  Tracking the Conservation Promise of Movement Ecology , 2018, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[44]  R. Kays,et al.  Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet , 2015, Science.

[45]  Martin Wæver Pedersen,et al.  State-space models for bio-loggers: A methodological road map , 2013 .