Use of Volumetry for Lung Nodule Management: Theory and Practice.

A consistent feature of many lung nodule management guidelines is the recommendation to evaluate nodule size by using diameter measurements and electronic calipers. Traditionally, the use of nodule volumetry applications has primarily been reserved for certain lung cancer screening trials rather than clinical practice. However, even before the first nodule management guidelines were published more than a decade ago, research has been ongoing into the use of nodule volumetry as a means of measuring nodule size, and this research has accelerated in recent years. This article aims to provide radiologists with an up-to-date review of the most recent literature on volumetry and volume doubling times in lung nodule management, outlining their benefits and drawbacks. A brief technical review of typical volumetry applications is also provided. © RSNA, 2017.

[1]  V. P. Collins,et al.  Observations on growth rates of human tumors. , 1956, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[2]  D. Geddes,et al.  The natural history of lung cancer: a review based on rates of tumour growth. , 1979, British journal of diseases of the chest.

[3]  W. Heindel,et al.  Volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules at multi-row detector CT: in vivo reproducibility , 2003, European Radiology.

[4]  M. Revel,et al.  Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? , 2004, Radiology.

[5]  J. Austin,et al.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. , 2005, Radiology.

[6]  J. Goo,et al.  Volumetric measurement of synthetic lung nodules with multi-detector row CT: effect of various image reconstruction parameters and segmentation thresholds on measurement accuracy. , 2005, Radiology.

[7]  L. Washington,et al.  Inherent variability of CT lung nodule measurements in vivo using semiautomated volumetric measurements. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Heinz-Otto Peitgen,et al.  Morphological segmentation and partial volume analysis for volumetry of solid pulmonary lesions in thoracic CT scans , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Marcos Salganicoff,et al.  Accuracy of automated volumetry of pulmonary nodules across different multislice CT scanners , 2007, European Radiology.

[10]  Hironobu Nakamura,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: 3D volumetric measurement with multidetector CT--effect of intravenous contrast medium. , 2007, Radiology.

[11]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC): a comparison of different size metrics for pulmonary nodule measurements. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[12]  Rebecca M. Lindell,et al.  Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers. , 2007, Radiology.

[13]  B. Nan,et al.  Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Iva Petkovska,et al.  The effect of lung volume on nodule size on CT. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[15]  Noriyuki Tomiyama,et al.  Computer-assisted lung nodule volumetry from multi-detector row CT: influence of image reconstruction parameters. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[16]  Michael K Gould,et al.  Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Nodules : When Is It Lung Cancer ? : ACCP Evaluation of Patients With Pulmonary , 2007 .

[17]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: Interscan variability of semiautomated volume measurements with multisection CT-- influence of inspiration level, nodule size, and segmentation performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[18]  Marcos Salganicoff,et al.  Automated Volumetry of Solid Pulmonary Nodules in a Phantom: Accuracy Across Different CT Scanner Technologies , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[19]  F. Detterbeck,et al.  Turning Gray: The Natural History of Lung Cancer Over Time , 2008, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[20]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Effect of CT scanning parameters on volumetric measurements of pulmonary nodules by 3D active contour segmentation: a phantom study. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Mark L. Nagurka,et al.  A comparative study for 2D and 3D computer-aided diagnosis methods for solitary pulmonary nodules , 2008, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[22]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Effect of nodule characteristics on variability of semiautomated volume measurements in pulmonary nodules detected in a lung cancer screening program. , 2008, Radiology.

[23]  B. Ginneken,et al.  A comparison of six software packages for evaluation of solid lung nodules using semi-automated volumetry: What is the minimum increase in size to detect growth in repeated CT examinations , 2009, European Radiology.

[24]  James G. Ravenel,et al.  Pulmonary nodule volume: effects of reconstruction parameters on automated measurements--a phantom study. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  J. Mulshine,et al.  Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: a non-invasive diagnostic protocol for baseline lung nodules. , 2008, Lung cancer.

[26]  Volker Dicken,et al.  Variability of Semiautomated Lung Nodule Volumetry on Ultralow-Dose CT: Comparison with Nodule Volumetry on Standard-Dose CT , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[27]  Kavita Garg,et al.  Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. , 2008, Radiology.

[28]  Wendy J. Post,et al.  Volumetric measurement of pulmonary nodules at low-dose chest CT: effect of reconstruction setting on measurement variability , 2009, European Radiology.

[29]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  Ying Wang,et al.  Smooth or attached solid indeterminate nodules detected at baseline CT screening in the NELSON study: cancer risk during 1 year of follow-up. , 2009, Radiology.

[31]  Paul J Nietert,et al.  Imprecision in automated volume measurements of pulmonary nodules and its effect on the level of uncertainty in volume doubling time estimation. , 2009, Chest.

[32]  In vivo repeatability of automated volume calculations of small pulmonary nodules with CT. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  Pulmonary ground-glass nodules: increase in mass as an early indicator of growth. , 2010, Radiology.

[34]  M. Prokop,et al.  Lung nodule volumetry: segmentation algorithms within the same software package cannot be used interchangeably , 2010, European Radiology.

[35]  G. Veronesi,et al.  Pulmonary nodules: Contrast-enhanced volumetric variation at different CT scan delays. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Variability of lung tumor measurements on repeat computed tomography scans taken within 15 minutes. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[38]  G. Krinsky,et al.  The utility of automated volumetric growth analysis in a dedicated pulmonary nodule clinic. , 2011, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[39]  Paul F. Pinsky,et al.  Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up CT scans at lung cancer screening. , 2011, Radiology.

[40]  Ali O. Farooqi,et al.  Lung cancers diagnosed at annual CT screening: volume doubling times. , 2012, Radiology.

[41]  Massimo Bellomi,et al.  Estimating Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[42]  Steven Shapiro,et al.  Doubling times and CT screen–detected lung cancers in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study. , 2012, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[43]  J. Goo,et al.  Computer-Aided Nodule Detection and Volumetry to Reduce Variability Between Radiologists in the Interpretation of Lung Nodules at Low-Dose Screening Computed Tomography , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[44]  A. Dirksen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer brings forward early disease. The randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial: status after five annual screening rounds with low-dose CT , 2012, Thorax.

[45]  Ugo Pastorino,et al.  Annual or biennial CT screening versus observation in heavy smokers: 5-year results of the MILD trial , 2012, European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation.

[46]  M. Tsuboi,et al.  Growth rate of lung cancer recognized as small solid nodule on initial CT findings. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[47]  T. Leiner,et al.  The Effects of Computed Tomography with Iterative Reconstruction on Solid Pulmonary Nodule Volume Quantification , 2013, PloS one.

[48]  D. Lynch,et al.  Interstitial lung abnormalities in a CT lung cancer screening population: prevalence and progression rate. , 2013, Radiology.

[49]  Wen He,et al.  Impact of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique on image quality in ultra-low-dose CT. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[50]  Sang Min Lee,et al.  A Comparison of Two Commercial Volumetry Software Programs in the Analysis of Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules: Segmentation Capability and Measurement Accuracy , 2013, Korean journal of radiology.

[51]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Slow-growing lung cancer as an emerging entity: from screening to clinical management , 2013, European Respiratory Journal.

[52]  M. Robins,et al.  Volumetric quantification of lung nodules in CT with iterative reconstruction (ASiR and MBIR). , 2013, Medical physics.

[53]  P M A van Ooijen,et al.  Inter- and intrascanner variability of pulmonary nodule volumetry on low-dose 64-row CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[54]  M. Revel Avoiding overdiagnosis in lung cancer screening: the volume doubling time strategy , 2013, European Respiratory Journal.

[55]  Kyle J Myers,et al.  Benefit of overlapping reconstruction for improving the quantitative assessment of CT lung nodule volume. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[56]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Pure and part-solid pulmonary ground-glass nodules: measurement variability of volume and mass in nodules with a solid portion less than or equal to 5 mm. , 2013, Radiology.

[57]  Harry J de Koning,et al.  Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[58]  O. Woo,et al.  Accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom study. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.

[59]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  Small irregular pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: observer detection sensitivity and volumetry accuracy. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[60]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Usefulness of Texture Analysis in Differentiating Transient from Persistent Part-solid Nodules(PSNs): A Retrospective Study , 2014, PloS one.

[61]  B. Ginneken,et al.  Interscan variation of semi-automated volumetry of subsolid pulmonary nodules , 2014, European Radiology.

[62]  M. Oudkerk,et al.  Comparison of three software systems for semi-automatic volumetry of pulmonary nodules on baseline and follow-up CT examinations , 2014, Acta radiologica.

[63]  Andreas Christe,et al.  Volumetric analysis of lung nodules in computed tomography (CT): comparison of two different segmentation algorithm softwares and two different reconstruction filters on automated volume calculation , 2014, Acta radiologica.

[64]  Lung cancer screening: what is the effect of using a larger nodule threshold size to determine who is assigned to short-term CT follow-up? , 2014, Radiology.

[65]  Katherine K. Taylor,et al.  The utility of nodule volume in the context of malignancy prediction for small pulmonary nodules. , 2014, Chest.

[66]  B. Kramer,et al.  Overdiagnosis in low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer. , 2014, JAMA internal medicine.

[67]  K. Fong,et al.  A retrospective study of volume doubling time in surgically resected non‐small cell lung cancer , 2014, Respirology.

[68]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Solid, Part-Solid, or Non-Solid?: Classification of Pulmonary Nodules in Low-Dose Chest Computed Tomography by a Computer-Aided Diagnosis System , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[69]  Effect of the High-Pitch Mode in Dual-Source Computed Tomography on the Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Volumetry of Solid Pulmonary Nodules: A Phantom Study , 2015, Korean journal of radiology.

[70]  N. Petrick,et al.  Statistical analysis of lung nodule volume measurements with CT in a large-scale phantom study. , 2015, Medical physics.

[71]  B. van Ginneken,et al.  Robust semi-automatic segmentation of pulmonary subsolid nodules in chest computed tomography scans , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[72]  N J Wald,et al.  UK Lung Cancer RCT Pilot Screening Trial: baseline findings from the screening arm provide evidence for the potential implementation of lung cancer screening , 2015, Thorax.

[73]  Temesguen Messay,et al.  Segmentation of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography using a regression neural network approach and its application to the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative dataset , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[74]  M. Prokop,et al.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules: accredited by NICE , 2015, Thorax.

[75]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  Software performance in segmenting ground-glass and solid components of subsolid nodules in pulmonary adenocarcinomas , 2016, European Radiology.

[76]  B. Ginneken,et al.  Comparison of the effects of model-based iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection algorithms on software measurements in pulmonary subsolid nodules , 2017, European Radiology.

[77]  A. Bankier,et al.  Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017. , 2017, Radiology.