A Descriptive Study of Bacterial Load of Full‐Thickness Surgical Wounds in Dermatologic Surgery

BACKGROUND Surgical site infections (SSIs) after dermatologic surgery cause pain, prolong healing, result in unaesthetic complications, and lead to excessive use of antibiotics. The pathogenesis of wound infections is complex and is dependent on bacterial load and diversity, among several factors. OBJECTIVE To investigate bacterial dynamics at dermatosurgical sites at different time intervals and assess the correlation with postoperative outcomes and to examine different endo‐ and exogenous factors that may contribute to SSIs. METHODS Eighteen patients undergoing skin grafting of the face were studied. The following SSI‐related factors were registered: age and sex of the patient, ulceration of the lesion, diabetes, immunosuppressive therapy, smoking, anticoagulative therapy, and use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Wounds from each patient were swabbed preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. The bacterial composition of the swabs was then analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS Sixteen of 18 surgical sites contained varying quantities of surface‐associated bacteria. Coagulase‐negative staphylococci and Propionibacterium acnes were the predominant bacteria isolated at all times. Intraoperative analysis was not predictive of SSIs. Use of antibiotic prophylaxis was the only registered SSI‐related factor that showed significant variation in bacterial load between pre‐ and postoperative samples. Postoperative bacterial load was found to be lower than preoperative load in patients who received antibiotics. This was in contrast to patients who did not receive antibiotics, who had significantly higher postoperative levels (p=.02). The presence of high postoperative bacterial loads, regardless of the bacterial species isolated, showed a statistically significant positive correlation with a complicated postoperative outcome (p≤.001). CONCLUSIONS This study provides novel insights into the bacterial dynamics of dermatologic surgery–induced wounds and the variation of this over time. The results highlight the potential relevance of quantifying bacterial loads, as well as determining specific types of bacteria, in dermatologic surgery. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

[1]  M. P. Dixon,et al.  Prospective Study of Skin Surgery in Patients With and Without Known Diabetes , 2009, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[2]  P. Bonham Swab Cultures for Diagnosing Wound Infections: A Literature Review and Clinical Guideline , 2009, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[3]  C D Owens,et al.  Surgical site infections: epidemiology, microbiology and prevention. , 2008, The Journal of hospital infection.

[4]  S. Lowry,et al.  Significant reduction in incidence of wound contamination by skin flora through use of microbial sealant. , 2008, Archives of surgery.

[5]  L. Baddour,et al.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in dermatologic surgery: advisory statement 2008. , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[6]  R. Dufresne,et al.  A Meta‐analysis of Complications Attributed to Anticoagulation among Patients following Cutaneous Surgery , 2007, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[7]  R. Grekin,et al.  Infectious complications and antibiotic use in dermatologic surgery. , 2007, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[8]  C. Saltzman,et al.  Diagnostic validity of three swab techniques for identifying chronic wound infection , 2006, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[9]  M. P. Dixon,et al.  Prospective Study of Wound Infections in Dermatologic Surgery in the Absence of Prophylactic Antibiotics , 2006, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[10]  M. Nestor Prophylaxis for and treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections in laser and cosmetic surgery. , 2005, Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD.

[11]  P. Hoffmeyer,et al.  The Value of Bacterial Culture During Clean Orthopedic Surgery a Prospective Study of 1,036 Patients , 2004, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[12]  Marlene R. Miller,et al.  Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries during hospitalization. , 2003, JAMA.

[13]  R. Grekin,et al.  Antibiotic use in dermatologic surgery. , 2003, Dermatologic clinics.

[14]  D. G. Armstrong,et al.  Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management , 2001, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[15]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[16]  M. Emmerson A microbiologist's view of factors contributing to infection. , 1998, New horizons.

[17]  S. Pirwitz HICPAC guidelines for isolation precautions: Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. , 1997, American journal of infection control.

[18]  P. Kouwenberg,et al.  Relevance of bacterial cultures of abdominal aortic aneurysm contents. , 1996, Surgery.

[19]  S. Wilson,et al.  Operative site bacteriology as an indicator of postoperative infectious complications in elective colorectal surgery. , 1995, The American surgeon.

[20]  J. Galante,et al.  Efficacy of intraoperative cultures obtained during revision total hip arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  D. Grande,et al.  Postoperative Wound Infection Rates in Dermatologic Surgery , 1995, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[22]  M. Ritter,et al.  Intraoperative wound cultures: their value and long-term effect on the patient. , 1981, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[23]  A. Mason,et al.  The quantitative swab culture and smear: A quick, simple method for determining the number of viable aerobic bacteria on open wounds. , 1976, The Journal of trauma.

[24]  R. Newcombe,et al.  A prospective study of the microbiology of chronic venous leg ulcers to reevaluate the clinical predictive value of tissue biopsies and swabs , 2007, Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society.

[25]  P. Bowler The 10(5) bacterial growth guideline: reassessing its clinical relevance in wound healing. , 2003, Ostomy/wound management.

[26]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[27]  M. Robson,et al.  Delayed wound closures based on bacterial counts , 1970, Journal of surgical oncology.

[28]  M. Robson,et al.  Bacterial quantification of open wounds. , 1969, Military medicine.

[29]  C. M. Martin,et al.  RELATIONSHIP OF QUANTITATIVE WOUND BACTERIAL COUNTS TO HEALING OF DECUBITI: EFFECT OF TOPICAL GENTAMICIN. , 1964, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.