Arthro-kinematics of the elbow: study of the carrying angle

The carrying angle of the elbow is usually assessed in full elbow extension, with a protractor goniometer, or derived from X-ray images. Substantial differences in carrying angle values have been reported, possibly explained by methodological differences. Carrying angles tend to show higher values in women than in men. The aim of this study was to confirm the previously described progressive decrease of the carrying angle as a function of increasing elbow flexion. After assessment of the carrying angle with a protractor goniometer and an electromagnetic tracking system (Flock of Birds) in extension, flexion–extension movements with the forearm held in supination were recorded by means of the latter system. Three recordings were averaged in both the left and the right elbows of 20 volunteers without a history of elbow pathology (10 males and 10 females; mean age 25 years). In extension, a mean (± SD) carrying angle of 11.6 ± 3.2° was found in the male and 16.7 ± 2.6° in the female subjects. The carrying angles progressively decreased with flexion, at the end changing into a mean (± SD) varus angle of 1.8 ± 2.9° in men and 1.6 ± 2.3° in women. Significant differences in carrying angles between the sexes were recorded in moving from 0 to 30° of flexion (p < 0.03 for the left and p < 0.01 for the right elbows), but disappeared beyond 30°. No statistically significant differences were found between the results of left and right elbows. Although statistically significant differences (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001) were found along the course of flexion and extension, these differences were small (<0.6°). The mean carrying angles at 0, 30, 60, 90 and 120° of flexion revealed larger standard deviations in the male group than in the female group.

[1]  A. Steindler Kinesiology of the Human Body Under Normal and Pathological Conditions , 1977 .

[2]  Thomas Reilly Musculoskeletal disorders in health-related occupations , 2002 .

[3]  Herbert Elftman,et al.  The carrying angle of the human arm as a secondary sex character , 1945 .

[4]  K. An,et al.  Parameters for modeling the upper extremity. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Potter Hp The Obliquity of the Arm of the Female in Extension. The Relation of the Forearm with the Upper Arm in Flexion. , 1895 .

[6]  D. Altchek,et al.  The elbow. , 1997, Clinics in sports medicine.

[7]  T. Keats,et al.  Normal axial relationships of the major joints. , 1966, Radiology.

[8]  F L STEEL,et al.  The carrying angle in man. , 1958, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  An Examination of the Elbow Articulation with Particular Reference to Variation of the Carrying Angle , 1977 .

[10]  E Y Chao,et al.  Three-dimensional rotation of the elbow. , 1978, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  J T Bryant,et al.  Geometry of the humeroulnar joint , 1988, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[12]  H P Potter The Obliquity of the Arm of the Female in Extension. The Relation of the Forearm with the Upper Arm in Flexion. , Journal of anatomy and physiology.

[13]  F A Baughman,et al.  The carrying angle in sex chromosome anomalies. , 1974, JAMA.

[14]  J. London Kinematics of the elbow. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  R. K. Beals,et al.  The normal carrying angle of the elbow. A radiographic study of 422 patients. , 1976, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  Peter S. Walker,et al.  Biomechanical basis for elbow hinge-distractor design. , 1987 .

[17]  P S Walker,et al.  Biomechanical basis for elbow hinge-distractor design. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  B. Anson,et al.  The palmaris longus muscle and tendon. A study of 1600 extremities , 1944 .