Multiparametric MRI correlates of sensorimotor function in the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis

Background: Spinal cord (SC) pathology is a major contributor to clinical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS). Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), specifically SC-MRI lesion load measures that include lesion count and volume, demonstrate only a modest relationship with the clinical status of MS patients. Although SC cross-sectional area (CSA) correlates better with clinical dysfunction than MRI lesion count, SC atrophy likely signifies irreversible tissue loss. Using quantitative MRI indices sensitive to early and late microstructural changes in the spinal cord, we searched for the presence of better correlations between MRI measures and clinical status in MS. Objectives: We investigated whether diffusion-tensor imaging indices and the magnetization-transfer ratio (MTR) were better associated with the clinical status of MS patients than conventional SC-MRI measures. Methods: A total of 129 MS patients underwent 3-tesla cervical SC-MRI and quantitative sensorimotor function testing, using the Vibratron-II and dynamometer. Regions-of-interest circumscribed the SC on axial slices between C3-C4. We calculated SC-CSA, fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), perpendicular diffusivity (λ⊥), parallel diffusivity (λ||) and MTR. We used multivariable linear regression to determine if there were any associations between MRI indices and clinical measures of dysfunction. Results: All MRI indices were significantly different in subjects with MS versus healthy controls, and between the progressive versus relapsing MS subtypes, with the exception of λ||. In multivariable regression models that were adjusted for age, sex, brain parenchymal fraction, and SC-CSA, the MRI indices independently explained variability in hip flexion strength (p-values: MD, λ⊥, λ|| < 0.001; FA = 0.07), vibration sensation threshold (p-values: FA = 0.04; MTR = 0.05; λ⊥ = 0.06), and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores (p-values: FA = 0.003; MD = 0.03; λ⊥ = 0.005; MTR = 0.02). Conclusions: In a large, heterogeneous MS sample, quantitative SC-MRI indices demonstrated independent associations with system-specific and global clinical dysfunction. Our findings suggest that the indices studied may provide important information about microstructural SC changes and the substrates of limb disability in MS. The identified structure-function relationships underpin the potential utility of these measures in assessments of therapeutic efficacy.

[1]  Rohit Bakshi,et al.  The Relationships among MRI‐Defined Spinal Cord Involvement, Brain Involvement, and Disability in Multiple Sclerosis , 2012, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[2]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Quantitative measures detect sensory and motor impairments in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[3]  M. Horsfield,et al.  A multicenter assessment of cervical cord atrophy among MS clinical phenotypes , 2011, Neurology.

[4]  Aaron Carass,et al.  Topology preserving automatic segmentation of the spinal cord in magnetic resonance images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[5]  Robert J Fox,et al.  Advanced MRI in multiple sclerosis: current status and future challenges. , 2011, Neurologic clinics.

[6]  Hsiao-Fang Liang,et al.  Radial diffusivity predicts demyelination in ex vivo multiple sclerosis spinal cords , 2011, NeuroImage.

[7]  E. Jeong,et al.  Using diffusion tensor imaging and immunofluorescent assay to evaluate the pathology of multiple sclerosis , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  A. MacKay,et al.  Is the magnetization transfer ratio a marker for myelin in multiple sclerosis? , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  D. Reich,et al.  Longitudinal changes in diffusion tensor–based quantitative MRI in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Neurology.

[10]  O. Ciccarelli,et al.  Recovery after spinal cord relapse in multiple sclerosis is predicted by radial diffusivity , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[11]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  q‐space and conventional diffusion imaging of axon and myelin damage in the rat spinal cord after axotomy , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  P. Calabresi,et al.  MRI of the corpus callosum in multiple sclerosis: association with disability , 2010, Multiple sclerosis.

[13]  Craig K. Jones,et al.  Reproducibility of tract‐specific magnetization transfer and diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord at 3 tesla , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[14]  Bennett A Landman,et al.  Complex geometric models of diffusion and relaxation in healthy and damaged white matter , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  M. Mirmehdi,et al.  16th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping , 2010 .

[16]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  The Java Image Science Toolkit (JIST) for Rapid Prototyping and Publishing of Neuroimaging Software , 2010, Neuroinformatics.

[17]  G. Comi,et al.  A diffusion tensor MRI study of cervical cord damage in benign and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients , 2009, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[18]  Eliza M. Gordon-Lipkin,et al.  Sensorimotor dysfunction in multiple sclerosis and column-specific magnetization transfer-imaging abnormalities in the spinal cord. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  R. Fox Picturing multiple sclerosis: conventional and diffusion tensor imaging. , 2008, Seminars in neurology.

[20]  O. Ciccarelli,et al.  Spinal cord spectroscopy and diffusion-based tractography to assess acute disability in multiple sclerosis. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  M. Filippi,et al.  In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  D. Reich,et al.  Quantitative characterization of the corticospinal tract at 3T. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[23]  G. Johnson,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging in multiple sclerosis: assessment of regional differences in the axial plane within normal-appearing cervical spinal cord. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[24]  David H. Miller,et al.  Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[25]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Spinal cord abnormalities in recently diagnosed MS patients , 2004, Neurology.

[26]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  F. Barkhof The clinico‐radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis revisited , 2002, Current opinion in neurology.

[28]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Diffuse signal abnormalities in the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis: Direct postmortem in situ magnetic resonance imaging correlated with in vitro high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology , 2002, Annals of neurology.

[29]  A. Compston,et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[30]  S. Lange,et al.  Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[31]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Post-mortem high-resolution MRI of the spinal cord in multiple sclerosis: a correlative study with conventional MRI, histopathology and clinical phenotype. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  G Cutter,et al.  Relationship between brain atrophy and disability: an 8-year follow-up study of multiple sclerosis patients. , 2000, Multiple sclerosis.

[33]  M. Horsfield,et al.  A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MS , 2000, Neurology.

[34]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: Magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[35]  A. Thompson,et al.  Magnetisation transfer ratio measurement in the cervical spinal cord: a preliminary study in multiple sclerosis , 1997, Neuroradiology.

[36]  W. Oldendorf Ultrasound Imaging of the Brain , 1992 .

[37]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[38]  P. J. Huber The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions , 1967 .