Chloroquine or amodiaquine combined with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine as a treatment for uncomplicated malaria--a systematic review.

The 4-aminoquinolines, chloroquine or amodiaquine, have long been the drugs of choice for treating uncomplicated, falciparum malaria in Africa, although resistance to them is now common. Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is the usual alternative when 4-aminoquinoline treatment fails. A combination-treatment regimen could combine the rapid symptom relief offered by the 4-aminoquinolines with the prolonged parasiticidal activity of SP, and also slow down development of resistance to the individual drugs. A systematic review of randomized trials was conducted so that the evidence of effectiveness and safety of such combination treatment could be summarized and compared with the results of treatment with either drug given alone. The results of trials were sought by searching through electronic databases and by contact with researchers in the field. Five studies were identified. Although there are few data, there is evidence that control of clinical symptoms is better when a 4-aminoquinoline is used with SP than when SP is used alone, and the cure rate also tends to be higher with the combination regimen. No evidence of serious side-effects was found. Larger scale trials are needed if this combination is to be adopted more widely.

[1]  P. Kremsner,et al.  Combination chemotherapy for Plasmodium falciparum malaria. , 1997, Parasitology today.

[2]  P. Kazembe,et al.  Parasitological and haematological responses to treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine in southern Malawi. , 1997, Annals of tropical medicine and parasitology.

[3]  C. Curtis,et al.  Resistance to pyrimethamine/sulfadoxine in Plasmodium falciparum in 12 villages in north east Tanzania and a test of chlorproguanil/dapsone. , 1997, Acta tropica.

[4]  R. Steketee,et al.  Beyond chloroquine: implications of drug resistance for evaluating malaria therapy efficacy and treatment policy in Africa. , 1993, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[5]  D. Stürchler,et al.  How Frequent are Notified Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions to Fansidar®? , 1993, Drug safety.

[6]  A. Schapira,et al.  [Comparative study of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and amodiaquine + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of malaria caused by chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Maputo, Mozambique]. , 1990, Bulletin de la Societe de pathologie exotique.

[7]  W. Ouyang,et al.  Effectiveness of amodiaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and combinations of these drugs for treating chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in Hainan Island, China. , 1988, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[8]  A. Schapira,et al.  Evaluation of four therapeutic regimens for falciparum malaria in Mozambique, 1986. , 1988, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[9]  M. Alpers,et al.  Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for the treatment of acute malaria in children in Papua New Guinea. I. Plasmodium falciparum. , 1982, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.