Comparison of Digitized Images for Cephalometric Analysis from Scanner and Digital Cameras

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the manual tracing of lateral cephalometric radiographs with the use of cephalometric software obtained by 2 methods: use of a scanner and use of cameras to test the accuracy of measurement for clinical orthodontic diagnosis. Material and Methods: The original method of manual tracing was compared to 2 radiographic digitization methods: A) captured from a scanner, B) captured from digital cameras applied to 40 randomly selected cephalograms of orthodontic patients at Mahidol University. The digital images from cameras and scanner were analyzed with image processing software (CephSmile). The repeatability test was obtained for all methods, and the paired t-test determined the statistical significance between digitized images and original manual tracings for thirty-four measurements. Results: The paired t-test showed no significant differences among all 34 variables. Most mean differences were less than 0.25 mm and 0.25 degrees. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences on measurement parameters for cephalometric analysis among manual tracing and computerized digital images from scanner and cameras.

[1]  Anwar Shah,et al.  Comparison of measurements from photographed lateral cephalograms and scanned cephalograms. , 2007, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Simonas Grybauskas,et al.  Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms. , 2007, Stomatologija.

[3]  A Wenzel,et al.  Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy, and monitor-displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique. , 1998, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  Barbara London A Short Course in Digital Photography , 2009 .

[5]  H N Baskin,et al.  A comparison of two computer cephalometric programs. , 1997, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[6]  D N Davis,et al.  Assessment of an automated cephalometric analysis system. , 1996, European journal of orthodontics.

[7]  A Wenzel,et al.  Reliability of landmark recording on film and digital lateral cephalograms. , 1993, European journal of orthodontics.

[8]  S Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. , 1971, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  Sheldon Baumrind,et al.  The reliability of head film measurements , 1971 .

[10]  P. J. Sandler,et al.  Reproducibility of Cephalometric Measurements , 1988, British journal of orthodontics.