Viscoelastic Properties of a Mixed Culture Biofilm from Rheometer Creep Analysis

The mechanical properties of mixed culture biofilms were determined by creep analysis using an AR1000 rotating disk rheometer. The biofilms were grown directly on the rheometer disks which were rotated in a chemostat for 12 d. The resulting biofilms were heterogeneous and ranged from 35 μm to 50 μm in thickness. The creep curves were all viscoelastic in nature. The close agreement between stress and strain ratio of a sample tested at 0.1 and 0.5 Pa suggested that the biofilms were tested in the linear viscoelastic range and supported the use of linear viscoelastic theory in the development of a constitutive law. The experimental data was fit to a 4-element Burger spring and dashpot model. The shear modulus (G) ranged from 0.2 to 24 Pa and the viscous coefficient (η) from 10 to 3000 Pa. These values were in the same range as those previously estimated from fluid shear deformation of biofilms in flow cells. A viscoelastic biofilm model will help to predict shear related biofilm phenomena such as elevated pressure drop, detachment, and the flow of biofilms over solid surfaces.

[1]  D. Allison,et al.  The Biofilm Matrix , 2003, Biofouling.

[2]  V. Körstgens,et al.  Influence of calcium ions on the mechanical properties of a model biofilm of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[3]  N. Zelver,et al.  Biofilm development and associated energy losses in water conduits , 1979 .

[4]  G. Mase,et al.  Continuum Mechanics for Engineers, Second Edition , 1999 .

[5]  P Stoodley,et al.  The influence of fluid shear and AICI3 on the material properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Desulfovibrio sp. EX265 biofilms. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  H. Lappin-Scott,et al.  The formation of migratory ripples in a mixed species bacterial biofilm growing in turbulent flow. , 1999, Environmental microbiology.

[7]  K. Cooksey,et al.  Adhesion of bacteria and diatoms to surfaces in the sea : a review , 1995 .

[8]  William G. Characklis,et al.  Attached microbial growths—II. Frictional resistance due to microbial slimes , 1973 .

[9]  Brain Butterworth Biofilm Growth and Hydraulic Performance , 1981 .

[10]  C. W. Keevil,et al.  Control ofLegionella pneumophila in a hospital water system by chlorine dioxide , 1995, Journal of Industrial Microbiology.

[11]  B. F. Picologlou,et al.  Biofilm Growth and Hydraulic Performance , 1980 .

[12]  Jost Wingender,et al.  Community structure and co-operation in biofilms: Cohesiveness in biofilm matrix polymers , 2000 .

[13]  R. Townsin The Ship Hull Fouling Penalty , 2003, Biofouling.

[14]  I. Sutherland,et al.  The biofilm matrix--an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. , 2001, Trends in microbiology.

[15]  G. E. Mase,et al.  Continuum Mechanics for Engineers , 1991 .

[16]  Cory J. Rupp,et al.  Biofilm material properties as related to shear-induced deformation and detachment phenomena , 2002, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  Hideki Harada,et al.  Adhesion strength of biofilm developed in an attached-growth reactor , 1994 .

[18]  M. Salkinoja-Salonen,et al.  Firm but Slippery Attachment of Deinococcus geothermalis , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  Cory J. Rupp,et al.  Viscoelastic fluid description of bacterial biofilm material properties. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  J. Costerton,et al.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. , 1999, Science.

[21]  M. Schultz,et al.  The influence of biofilms on skin friction drag , 2000, Biofouling.