Hybrid Method of Remote Sensing of Electrostatic Potential for Proximity Operations

Touchless determination of electrostatic potential is an enabling technology for a wide variety of orbital robotics applications. This concept is useful for characterizing satellite surfaces during servicing missions, preventing electrostatic discharge during initial contact, and accounting for electrostatic perturbations that affect the relative motion during proximity operations. The electrostatic tractor concept proposes using these forces and torques to detumble or tow uncontrolled satellites to graveyard orbits. All of these applications require the ability to remotely sense the voltage on another spacecraft prior to any physical contact. Two methods have been proposed for remote monitoring of spacecraft electrostatic potential from a co-orbiting craft. This paper considers fusing data from both sensing methods to mitigate the limitations of each method and produce a robust estimate of the surface voltage. The methods involve observing x-ray and electron spectra emitted when energetic electrons, such as those from an electron gun, strike the surface of the target. The electron method provides a highly accurate estimate but is strongly sensitive to the relative geometry of the spacecraft which limits the times during which a usable signal is received. The x-ray method produces a less accurate estimate but is less affected by the target geometry. Experimental results demonstrate that fusing the datasets produces significant improvements in accuracy and geometrical coverage of the voltage estimate across a wide range of conditions, including a rotating target plate. These results are important for future missions which must remotely monitor the potential on a nearby object to ensure mission success.

[1]  M. S. Gussenhoven,et al.  SCATHA survey of high-level spacecraft charging in sunlight , 1986 .

[2]  Benjamin B. Reed,et al.  The Restore-L Servicing Mission , 2016 .

[3]  Joseph Hughes,et al.  Survey of the electrostatic tractor research for reorbiting passive GEO space objects , 2018, Astrodynamics.

[4]  M. Lamoureux,et al.  General deconvolution of thin-target and thick-target Bremsstrahlung spectra to determine electron energy distributions , 2006 .

[5]  C. L. Enloe,et al.  High‐resolution retarding potential analyzer , 1994 .

[6]  Z. Sternovsky,et al.  Reduction of asymmetry transport in the annular Penning trap , 2004 .

[7]  C. Fish,et al.  A versatile retarding potential analyzer for nano-satellite platforms. , 2015, The Review of scientific instruments.

[8]  S. Lai Fundamentals of Spacecraft Charging: Spacecraft Interactions with Space Plasmas , 2011 .

[9]  DuaneW.,et al.  X-Ray Wave-Lengths , 2022 .

[10]  H. Schaub,et al.  Detumbling Attitude Control Analysis Considering an Electrostatic Pusher Configuration , 2019, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[11]  P. Anderson,et al.  Characteristics of spacecraft charging in low Earth orbit , 2012 .

[12]  David Barnhart,et al.  Phoenix Program Status - 2013 , 2013 .

[13]  H. Schaub,et al.  Remote Sensing of Spacecraft Potential at Geosynchronous Orbit using Secondary and Photo Electrons , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[14]  V. Aslanov,et al.  Motion Control of Space Tug During Debris Removal by a Coulomb Force , 2018, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics.

[15]  David Barnhart,et al.  DARPA Phoenix Payload Orbital Delivery System (PODs): “FedEx to GEO” , 2013 .

[16]  T. Everhart,et al.  Simple calculation of energy distribution of low‐energy secondary electrons emitted from metals under electron bombardment , 1974 .

[17]  Hajo Bruining,et al.  Physics and applications of secondary electron emission , 1954 .

[18]  Hanspeter Schaub,et al.  Prospects and Challenges for Touchless Sensing of Spacecraft Electrostatic Potential Using Electrons , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[19]  David W. Miller,et al.  Definition and testing of an architectural tradespace for on-orbit assemblers and servicers , 2014 .

[20]  K. Wilson,et al.  Experimental Results of Electron Method for Remote Spacecraft Charge Sensing , 2020, Space Weather.

[21]  H. Schaub,et al.  Touchless Electrostatic Three-dimensional Detumbling of Large Axi-symmetric Debris , 2015 .

[22]  H. Schaub,et al.  X-Ray Spectroscopy for Electrostatic Potential and Material Determination of Space Objects , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.