Performance of Hydra Probe and MPS-1 Soil Water Sensors in Topsoil Tested in Lab and Field

Soil water sensors are commonly used to monitor water content and matric potential in order to study hydrological processes such as evaporation. Finding a proper sensor is sometimes difficult, especially for measurements in topsoil, where changes of temperature and soil water dynamics occur generally with greater intensity compared to deeper soil layers. We assessed the perfor-mance of Hydra Probe water content sensors and MPS-1 matric potential sensors in topsoil in the laboratory and in the field. A common soil-specific calibration function was determined for the Hydra Probes. Measurement accuracy and sensor-to-sensor variation were within the manufacturer specification of ±0.03 m3·m-3. Hydra Probes can operate from dry to saturated conditions. Sensor-specific calibrations from a previous study were used to reduce sensor-to-sensor variation of MPS-1. Measurement accuracy can be expressed by a mean relative error of 10%. According to the manufacturer, the application range of matric potential readings is from -10 kPa to -500 kPa. MPS-1 delivered also values beyond this range, but they were not reliable. Sensor electronics of the MPS-1 were sensitive to ambient temperature changes. Beyond instrument effects, field measurements showed substantial temperature-driven fluctuations of soil water content and matric potential, which complicated data interpretation.

[1]  Evert Slob,et al.  Measuring soil surface water content in irrigated areas of southern Tunisia using full-waveform inversion of proximal GPR data , 2008 .

[2]  Mark S. Seyfried,et al.  Dielectric Loss and Calibration of the Hydra Probe Soil Water Sensor , 2005 .

[3]  Reinhard Nolz,et al.  Interpretation of lysimeter weighing data affected by wind , 2013 .

[4]  Mark S. Seyfried,et al.  Temperature Effects on Soil Dielectric Properties Measured at 50 MHz , 2007 .

[5]  Mark S. Seyfried,et al.  Measurement of soil water content with a 50-MHz soil dielectric sensor , 2004 .

[6]  T. Huntington.  Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis , 2006 .

[7]  A. Reşit Brohi,et al.  Spatial variation of soil water content in topsoil and subsoil of a Typic Ustifluvent , 2006 .

[8]  Binayak P. Mohanty,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of water and heat in a field soil , 1998 .

[9]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Evaluation of Standard Calibration Functions for Eight Electromagnetic Soil Moisture Sensors , 2013 .

[10]  Enrique R. Vivoni,et al.  Seasonal and interannual relations between precipitation, surface soil moisture and vegetation dynamics in the North American monsoon region , 2009 .

[11]  Jan W. Hopmans,et al.  Evaluation of MPS-1 soil water potential sensor , 2011 .

[12]  G. Hancock,et al.  Spatio‐temporal distribution of near‐surface and root zone soil moisture at the catchment scale , 2008 .

[13]  Steven R. Evett,et al.  In-Soil and Down-Hole Soil Water Sensors: Characteristics for Irrigation Management , 2010 .

[14]  Reinhard Nolz,et al.  Calibrating soil water potential sensors integrated into a wireless monitoring network , 2013 .

[15]  Keith Bellingham.  The Stevens Hydra Probe Inorganic Soil Calibrations , 2007 .

[16]  Pedro Sánchez,et al.  Wireless Sensor Networks for precision horticulture in Southern Spain , 2009 .

[17]  A. B. Smith,et al.  The Murrumbidgee soil moisture monitoring network data set , 2012 .

[18]  Tomohisa Yano,et al.  Test of a simple model for estimating evaporation from bare soils in different environments , 2005 .

[19]  Calibrating electromagnetic short soil water sensors , 2010 .

[20]  J. Monteith,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics , 2014 .

[21]  M. Parlange,et al.  On water vapor transport in field soils , 1998 .

[22]  Gerald N. Flerchinger,et al.  Effects of crop residue cover and architecture on heat and water transfer at the soil surface , 2003 .

[23]  Calvin Wyatt Rose,et al.  Water transport in soil with a daily temperature wave. I. Theory and experiment , 1968 .