Life Cycle, PESTLE and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Membrane Contactor-Based Nitrogen Recovery Process

Nitrogen is one of the most critical nutrients in the biosphere, and it is an essential nutrient for plant growth. Nitrogen exists in the atmosphere vastly as a gaseous form, but only reactive nitrogen is usable for plants. It is a valuable resource and worth recovering in the wastewater sector. The aim of this work was to prepare a comprehensive environmental analysis of a novel membrane contactor-based process, which is capable of highly efficient nitrogen removal from wastewater. Life cycle assessment (LCA), PESTLE and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) were applied to evaluate the process. The EF 3.0 method, preferred by the European Commission, IMPACT World+, ReCiPe 2016 and IPCC 2021 GWP100 methods were used with six different energy resources—electricity high voltage, solar, nuclear, heat and power and wind energy. The functional unit of 1 m3 of water product was considered as output and “gate-to-gate” analysis was examined. The results of our study show that renewable energy resources cause a significantly lower environmental load than traditional energy resources. TOPSIS score was used to evaluate the alternatives in the case of MCDA. For the EU region, the most advantageous option was found to be wind energy onshore with a score of 0.76, and the following, nuclear, was 0.70.

[1]  P. Martín‐Ramos,et al.  Comparison of the Ammonia Trapping Performance of Different Gas-Permeable Tubular Membrane System Configurations , 2022, Membranes.

[2]  Yu Li,et al.  Polyurethane-based gas separation membranes: A review and perspectives , 2022, Separation and Purification Technology.

[3]  P. Gurian,et al.  Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of nitrogen recovery by ammonia air-stripping from wastewater treatment. , 2022, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Z. Günkaya,et al.  An environmental and economic assessment based on life cycle approaches for industrial wastewater treatment and water recovery , 2022, Journal of Water Process Engineering.

[5]  T. Hartmann,et al.  A multi-criteria decision-making framework for residential building renovation using pairwise comparison and TOPSIS methods , 2022, Journal of Building Engineering.

[6]  S. Freguia,et al.  Modelling and techno-economic assessment of (bio)electrochemical nitrogen removal and recovery from reject water at full WWTP scale. , 2022, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Haoran Duan,et al.  A comprehensive carbon footprint analysis of different wastewater treatment plant configurations. , 2022, Environmental research.

[8]  Alberto Finzi,et al.  Nitrogen Recovery from Different Livestock Slurries with an Innovative Stripping Process , 2022, Sustainability.

[9]  D. Aguado,et al.  Pls-Based Soft-Sensor to Predict Ammonium Concentration Evolution in Hollow Fibre Membrane Contactors for Nitrogen Recovery , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Yong Hou,et al.  Recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from livestock slurry with treatment technologies: A meta-analysis. , 2022, Waste management.

[11]  A. Heidari,et al.  Integrating life cycle assessment and life cycle costing using TOPSIS to select sustainable biomass-based -carbonaceous adsorbents for CO2 capture , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  S. Dewalkar,et al.  Integrated Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Assessment based fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for selection of appropriate wastewater treatment system , 2022, Journal of Water Process Engineering.

[13]  D. Deb,et al.  Optimization of on-site PID detection methods , 2022, Degradation, Mitigation, and Forecasting Approaches in Thin Film Photovoltaics.

[14]  P. Mizsey,et al.  Applicability of Membranes in Protective Face Masks and Comparison of Reusable and Disposable Face Masks with Life Cycle Assessment , 2021, Sustainability.

[15]  F. Manenti,et al.  Comparison of Desalination Technologies Using Renewable Energy Sources with Life Cycle, PESTLE, and Multi-Criteria Decision Analyses , 2021, Water.

[16]  P. Chiang,et al.  Advanced ammonia nitrogen removal and recovery technology using electrokinetic and stripping process towards a sustainable nitrogen cycle: A review , 2021 .

[17]  M. Al-Marzouqi,et al.  Current and future trends in polymer membrane-based gas separation technology: A comprehensive review , 2021 .

[18]  A. Mikola,et al.  Newly developed membrane contactor-based N and P recovery process: Pilot-scale field experiments and cost analysis , 2021, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  H. Ngo,et al.  Bio-membrane based integrated systems for nitrogen recovery in wastewater treatment: Current applications and future perspectives. , 2020, Chemosphere.

[20]  V. Zeller,et al.  Nitrogen in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of agricultural crop production systems: Comparative analysis of regionalization approaches. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  Kais Saidi,et al.  Reducing CO2 emissions in OECD countries: Do renewable and nuclear energy matter? , 2020 .

[22]  Lluís Corominas,et al.  The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review. , 2020, Water research.

[23]  Antoni Sánchez,et al.  Solid-State Fermentation (SSF) versus Submerged Fermentation (SmF) for the Recovery of Cellulases from Coffee Husks: A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Based Comparison , 2020, Energies.

[24]  A. Shanableh,et al.  Techno-economic and environmental assessment of wastewater management systems: Life cycle approach , 2020 .

[25]  Hafiz M.N. Iqbal,et al.  Life cycle assessment in wastewater treatment technology , 2020 .

[26]  K. Lam,et al.  Life cycle assessment of nutrient recycling from wastewater: A critical review. , 2020, Water research.

[27]  S. K. Pradhan,et al.  Recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from human urine using membrane and precipitation process. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[28]  J. Nagy,et al.  Nitrogen recovery from wastewater and human urine with hydrophobic gas separation membrane: experiments and modelling , 2019, Chemical Papers.

[29]  Vasiliki Balioti,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making Using TOPSIS Method Under Fuzzy Environment. Application in Spillway Selection , 2018, Proceedings.

[30]  Guilherme Marcelo Zanghelini,et al.  How Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is aiding Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in results interpretation , 2018 .

[31]  M. Eckelman,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Advanced Nutrient Removal Technologies for Wastewater Treatment. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment for desalination: a review on methodology feasibility and reliability. , 2014, Water research.

[33]  A. Holma,et al.  Assessing environmental impacts of biomass production chains - application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). , 2012 .

[34]  W. J. Hadden,et al.  A Comparison of , 1971 .