Pronoun copying in Dinka Bor and the Copy Theory of Movement

A fundamental question in contemporary minimalist approaches to movement is why copies left by phrasal movement are not realized. Particularly puzzling from this perspective is the observation that pronouns, in a range of environments, appear to function as spell-outs of gaps (e.g. Zaenen et al. 1981; Koopman 1982, 1984; Sells 1984; Engdahl 1985; Pesetsky 1998; Boeckx 2003; Kandybowicz 2007; Holmberg and Nikanne 2008; Harizanov 2014; Sichel 2014), a phenomenon I refer to as pronoun copying. This paper first presents a novel pronoun copying pattern in the Nilotic language Dinka Bor, in which a 3rd person plural pronoun spells out intermediate copies at the verb phrase edge. I then show that Dinka pronoun copying displays two unusual number asymmetries that provide a unique insight into the link between pronoun copying and copy deletion: (i) the pronoun matches only in number, not person, and (ii) only plural DPs initiate copying. Importantly, this number sensitivity mirrors a general asymmetry in the expression of singular and plural. I argue that this parallel reveals that pronoun copying in Dinka reflects partial deletion in a DP copy, deleting everything but the structure that hosts number information. The availability of partial deletion in multiple copy spell-out is shown to follow from an approach to copy deletion based on economy, as developed by Landau (2006). In support of this, I demonstrate that Dinka’s asymmetries in fact have their counterparts across pronoun copying constructions and develop a unified account of pronoun copying crosslinguistically.

[1]  Jeremy Hartman,et al.  The Semantic Uniformity of Traces: Evidence from Ellipsis Parallelism , 2011, Linguistic Inquiry.

[2]  Claudia Felser,et al.  Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity , 2004 .

[3]  David Pesetsky,et al.  Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation , 1998 .

[4]  M. Koppen,et al.  Subject doubling in Dutch dialects , 2002 .

[5]  Tue Trinh,et al.  Edges and linearization , 2011 .

[6]  D. Ladd,et al.  On the distinction between regular and irregular inflectional morphology: Evidence from Dinka , 2009 .

[7]  M. Brody,et al.  Mirror Theory: Syntactic Representation in Perfect Syntax , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[8]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Topics in Ellipsis: Variable island repair under ellipsis , 2008 .

[9]  K Abels The Predicate Cleft Construction in Russian , 2000 .

[10]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.

[11]  Torben Andersen Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb inflection , 1993, Phonology.

[12]  I. Landau Chain Resolution In Hebrew V(P)-fronting , 2006 .

[13]  Nicolas Guilliot,et al.  When Resumption determines Reconstruction , 2006 .

[14]  R. Kramer Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic , 2014 .

[15]  Nicholas D. Evans,et al.  A grammar of Kayardild : with historical-comparative notes on Tangkic , 1995 .

[16]  Željko Bošković,et al.  From the Complex NP Constraint to everything: On deep extractions across categories , 2015 .

[17]  Gosse Bouma,et al.  Satisfying Constraints on Extraction andAdjunction , 2001 .

[18]  Nicholas Evans,et al.  A Grammar Of Kayardild , 1995 .

[19]  P. Postal On So-Called “Pronouns” in English , 2013 .

[20]  C. Boeckx Islands and Chains: Resumption as stranding , 2003 .

[21]  E. Anagnostopoulou The syntax of ditransitives : evidence from clitics , 2003 .

[22]  Ž. Bošković Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.

[23]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures , 2001 .

[24]  Torben Andersen,et al.  Case inflection and nominal head marking in Dinka , 2002 .

[25]  I. Sichel Resumptive Pronouns and Competition , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.

[26]  David Hall,et al.  Spelling Out the Noun Phrase: Interpretation, Word Order, and the Problem of `Meaningless Movement' , 2016 .

[27]  Ellen F. Prince,et al.  Swedish VP-Topicalization and Yiddish Verb-Topicalization , 1989, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[28]  Bettina Gruber,et al.  The Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Person: A Morphosyntactic Account of Indexical Pronouns , 2013 .

[29]  Danny Fox,et al.  Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure , 2005 .

[30]  B. Moskal Limits on Allomorphy: A Case Study in Nominal Suppletion , 2015, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Ash Asudeh,et al.  The Logic of Pronominal Resumption , 2012 .

[32]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Syntactic variation in German wh-questions , 2008 .

[33]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  Towards a Minimalist Theory of Wh-Expletives, Wh-Copying, and Successive Cyclicity , 2000 .

[34]  Torben Andersen Number in Dinka , 2014 .

[35]  David Pesetsky,et al.  T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences , 2000 .

[36]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax , 2008 .

[37]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure , 1981 .

[38]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure , 2002 .

[39]  E. Engdahl Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions , 1985 .

[40]  Valentina Bianchi,et al.  Some notes on the ‘specificity effects’of optional resumptive pronouns , 2011 .

[41]  Tue Trinh Edges and linearization: A reply , 2010 .

[42]  H. Koopman,et al.  VARIABLES AND THE BIJECTION PRINCIPLE , 1982 .

[43]  Fred Karlsson Finnish: An Essential Grammar , 1999 .

[44]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[45]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[46]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon , 2011 .

[47]  Torben Andersen Case inflection of construct-state constructions in Dinka , 2016 .

[48]  Torben Andersen Subject and topic in Dinka , 1991 .

[49]  Susi Wurmbrand,et al.  The Domain of Agreement , 2005 .

[50]  Boris Harizanov,et al.  Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface , 2014 .

[51]  Heidi Harley Merge, conflation, and head movement: The First Sister Principle revisited * , 2004 .

[52]  Paul D. Elbourne Situations and individuals , 2005 .

[53]  Paul Elbourne,et al.  E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion , 2001 .

[55]  U. Nikanne,et al.  11: Subject Doubling In Finnish: The Role Of Deficient Pronouns , 2008 .

[56]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[57]  David Embick,et al.  Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology , 2010 .

[58]  Jairo Nunes Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement , 2004 .

[59]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Syntactic variation in German wh-questions: Empirical investigations of weak crossover violations and long wh-movement , 2005 .

[60]  Noam Chomsky Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[61]  Benjamin Bruening,et al.  Differences between the Wh-Scope-Marking and Wh-Copy Constructions in Passamaquoddy , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[62]  Michal Starke,et al.  Nanosyntax : A short primer to a new approach to language , 2010 .

[64]  Jonathan David Bobaljik,et al.  Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words , 2012 .

[65]  Norvin Richards,et al.  Two Components of Long-Distance Extraction: Successive Cyclicity in Dinka , 2015, Linguistic Inquiry.

[66]  HILDA KOOPMAN,et al.  CONTROL FROM COMP AND COMPARATIVE SYNTAX , 1983 .

[67]  Omer Preminger Agreement as a fallible operation , 2011 .

[68]  Lisa deMena Travis,et al.  Parameters and effects of word order variation , 1984 .

[69]  Hans van de Koot,et al.  A Local Encoding of Syntactic Dependencies and Its Consequences for the Theory of Movement , 2010 .

[70]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  Towards deriving differences in how Wh Movement and QR are pronounced , 2012 .

[71]  Beata Moskal,et al.  Case and number suppletion in pronouns , 2018, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.

[72]  Jason Kandybowicz,et al.  The Grammar of Repetition: Nupe grammar at the syntax-phonology interface , 2008 .

[73]  Andrew Nevins,et al.  Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number , 2011 .

[74]  Dominique Sportiche,et al.  A note on long extraction in Vata and the ECP , 1986 .