Pronoun copying in Dinka Bor and the Copy Theory of Movement
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jeremy Hartman,et al. The Semantic Uniformity of Traces: Evidence from Ellipsis Parallelism , 2011, Linguistic Inquiry.
[2] Claudia Felser,et al. Wh-copying, phases, and successive cyclicity , 2004 .
[3] David Pesetsky,et al. Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation , 1998 .
[4] M. Koppen,et al. Subject doubling in Dutch dialects , 2002 .
[5] Tue Trinh,et al. Edges and linearization , 2011 .
[6] D. Ladd,et al. On the distinction between regular and irregular inflectional morphology: Evidence from Dinka , 2009 .
[7] M. Brody,et al. Mirror Theory: Syntactic Representation in Perfect Syntax , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.
[8] Jason Merchant,et al. Topics in Ellipsis: Variable island repair under ellipsis , 2008 .
[9] K Abels. The Predicate Cleft Construction in Russian , 2000 .
[10] Joseph H. Greenberg,et al. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements , 1990, On Language.
[11] Torben Andersen. Vowel quality alternation in Dinka verb inflection , 1993, Phonology.
[12] I. Landau. Chain Resolution In Hebrew V(P)-fronting , 2006 .
[13] Nicolas Guilliot,et al. When Resumption determines Reconstruction , 2006 .
[14] R. Kramer. Clitic doubling or object agreement: the view from Amharic , 2014 .
[15] Nicholas D. Evans,et al. A grammar of Kayardild : with historical-comparative notes on Tangkic , 1995 .
[16] Željko Bošković,et al. From the Complex NP Constraint to everything: On deep extractions across categories , 2015 .
[17] Gosse Bouma,et al. Satisfying Constraints on Extraction andAdjunction , 2001 .
[18] Nicholas Evans,et al. A Grammar Of Kayardild , 1995 .
[19] P. Postal. On So-Called “Pronouns” in English , 2013 .
[20] C. Boeckx. Islands and Chains: Resumption as stranding , 2003 .
[21] E. Anagnostopoulou. The syntax of ditransitives : evidence from clitics , 2003 .
[22] Ž. Bošković. Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.
[23] Norvin Richards,et al. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures , 2001 .
[24] Torben Andersen,et al. Case inflection and nominal head marking in Dinka , 2002 .
[25] I. Sichel. Resumptive Pronouns and Competition , 2014, Linguistic Inquiry.
[26] David Hall,et al. Spelling Out the Noun Phrase: Interpretation, Word Order, and the Problem of `Meaningless Movement' , 2016 .
[27] Ellen F. Prince,et al. Swedish VP-Topicalization and Yiddish Verb-Topicalization , 1989, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.
[28] Bettina Gruber,et al. The Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Person: A Morphosyntactic Account of Indexical Pronouns , 2013 .
[29] Danny Fox,et al. Cyclic Linearization of Syntactic Structure , 2005 .
[30] B. Moskal. Limits on Allomorphy: A Case Study in Nominal Suppletion , 2015, Linguistic Inquiry.
[31] Ash Asudeh,et al. The Logic of Pronominal Resumption , 2012 .
[32] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. Syntactic variation in German wh-questions , 2008 .
[33] Gisbert Fanselow,et al. Towards a Minimalist Theory of Wh-Expletives, Wh-Copying, and Successive Cyclicity , 2000 .
[34] Torben Andersen. Number in Dinka , 2014 .
[35] David Pesetsky,et al. T-to-C Movement: Causes and Consequences , 2000 .
[36] Gillian Ramchand,et al. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax , 2008 .
[37] Gerald Gazdar,et al. Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinate Structure , 1981 .
[38] S. J. Keyser,et al. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure , 2002 .
[39] E. Engdahl. Parasitic gaps, resumptive pronouns, and subject extractions , 1985 .
[40] Valentina Bianchi,et al. Some notes on the ‘specificity effects’of optional resumptive pronouns , 2011 .
[41] Tue Trinh. Edges and linearization: A reply , 2010 .
[42] H. Koopman,et al. VARIABLES AND THE BIJECTION PRINCIPLE , 1982 .
[43] Fred Karlsson. Finnish: An Essential Grammar , 1999 .
[44] Noam Chomsky,et al. The Minimalist Program , 1992 .
[45] Alec Marantz,et al. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .
[46] Peter Svenonius,et al. Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon , 2011 .
[47] Torben Andersen. Case inflection of construct-state constructions in Dinka , 2016 .
[48] Torben Andersen. Subject and topic in Dinka , 1991 .
[49] Susi Wurmbrand,et al. The Domain of Agreement , 2005 .
[50] Boris Harizanov,et al. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface , 2014 .
[51] Heidi Harley. Merge, conflation, and head movement: The First Sister Principle revisited * , 2004 .
[52] Paul D. Elbourne. Situations and individuals , 2005 .
[53] Paul Elbourne,et al. E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion , 2001 .
[55] U. Nikanne,et al. 11: Subject Doubling In Finnish: The Role Of Deficient Pronouns , 2008 .
[56] Noam Chomsky,et al. Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .
[57] David Embick,et al. Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology , 2010 .
[58] Jairo Nunes. Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement , 2004 .
[59] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. Syntactic variation in German wh-questions: Empirical investigations of weak crossover violations and long wh-movement , 2005 .
[60] Noam Chomsky. Derivation by phase , 1999 .
[61] Benjamin Bruening,et al. Differences between the Wh-Scope-Marking and Wh-Copy Constructions in Passamaquoddy , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.
[62] Michal Starke,et al. Nanosyntax : A short primer to a new approach to language , 2010 .
[64] Jonathan David Bobaljik,et al. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words , 2012 .
[65] Norvin Richards,et al. Two Components of Long-Distance Extraction: Successive Cyclicity in Dinka , 2015, Linguistic Inquiry.
[66] HILDA KOOPMAN,et al. CONTROL FROM COMP AND COMPARATIVE SYNTAX , 1983 .
[67] Omer Preminger. Agreement as a fallible operation , 2011 .
[68] Lisa deMena Travis,et al. Parameters and effects of word order variation , 1984 .
[69] Hans van de Koot,et al. A Local Encoding of Syntactic Dependencies and Its Consequences for the Theory of Movement , 2010 .
[70] Kyle Johnson,et al. Towards deriving differences in how Wh Movement and QR are pronounced , 2012 .
[71] Beata Moskal,et al. Case and number suppletion in pronouns , 2018, Natural Language & Linguistic Theory.
[72] Jason Kandybowicz,et al. The Grammar of Repetition: Nupe grammar at the syntax-phonology interface , 2008 .
[73] Andrew Nevins,et al. Multiple agree with clitics: person complementarity vs. omnivorous number , 2011 .
[74] Dominique Sportiche,et al. A note on long extraction in Vata and the ECP , 1986 .