Dental microwear texture analysis shows within-species diet variability in fossil hominins

Reconstructing the diets of extinct hominins is essential to understanding the paleobiology and evolutionary history of our lineage. Dental microwear, the study of microscopic tooth-wear resulting from use, provides direct evidence of what an individual ate in the past. Unfortunately, established methods of studying microwear are plagued with low repeatability and high observer error. Here we apply an objective, repeatable approach for studying three-dimensional microwear surface texture to extinct South African hominins. Scanning confocal microscopy together with scale-sensitive fractal analysis are used to characterize the complexity and anisotropy of microwear. Results for living primates show that this approach can distinguish among diets characterized by different fracture properties. When applied to hominins, microwear texture analysis indicates that Australopithecus africanus microwear is more anisotropic, but also more variable in anisotropy than Paranthropus robustus. This latter species has more complex microwear textures, but is also more variable in complexity than A. africanus. This suggests that A. africanus ate more tough foods and P. robustus consumed more hard and brittle items, but that both had variable and overlapping diets.

[1]  R. Wrangham,et al.  Hardness of cercopithecine foods: implications for the critical function of enamel thickness in exploiting fallback foods. , 2004, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  J. Eisenberg Mammals of the Neotropics, Volume 1: The Northern Neotropics: Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana , 1989 .

[3]  S. Strait Molar microwear in extant small-bodied faunivorous mammals: an analysis of feature density and pit frequency. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[4]  R. Savage,et al.  The Mechanics of Food Reduction in Tarsius bancanus , 1998, Folia Primatologica.

[5]  K. Hunt,et al.  Dietary Response of Chimpanzees and Cercopithecines to Seasonal Variation in Fruit Abundance. II. Macronutrients , 1998, International Journal of Primatology.

[6]  F. Grine,et al.  Early hominid diets from quantitative image analysis of dental microwear , 1988, Nature.

[7]  Peter S Ungar,et al.  Quantification of dental microwear by tandem scanning confocal microscopy and scale-sensitive fractal analyses. , 2006, Scanning.

[8]  H. Campbell,et al.  Diet , 1906, The Hospital.

[9]  T. Molleson,et al.  Dietary change and the effects of food preparation on microwear patterns in the Late Neolithic of abu Hureyra, northern Syria , 1993 .

[10]  Peter S. Ungar,et al.  A semiautomated image analysis procedure for the quantification of dental microwear II. , 2006, Scanning.

[11]  F. Grine Dental evidence for dietary differences in Australopithecus and Paranthropus: a quantitative analysis of permanent molar microwear , 1986 .

[12]  Christopher A. Brown,et al.  Scale-sensitivity, fractal analysis and simulations , 1998 .

[13]  K. D. Gordon,et al.  A study of microwear on chimpanzee molars: implications for dental microwear analysis. , 1982, American journal of physical anthropology.

[14]  J. Eisenberg Mammals of the Neotropics , 1989 .

[15]  K. Hunt,et al.  Dietary Response of Chimpanzees and Cercopithecines to Seasonal Variation in Fruit Abundance. I. Antifeedants , 2004, International Journal of Primatology.

[16]  R. Kay,et al.  The evolution of molar occlusion in the Cercopithecidae and early Catarrhines. , 1977, American journal of physical anthropology.

[17]  A. Ryan Anterior dental microwear and its relationship to diet and feeding behavior in three african primates (Pan troglodytes troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla gorilla andPapio hamadryas) , 1981, Primates.

[18]  Christopher A. Brown,et al.  Fundamental scales of adhesion and area-scale fractal analysis , 2001 .

[19]  C. Brown,et al.  Interaction between horizontal scanning instruments and surfaces , 2001 .

[20]  P. M. Butler,et al.  Development, function and evolution of teeth , 1978 .

[21]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates , 1981 .

[22]  M F Teaford,et al.  Error rates in dental microwear quantification using scanning electron microscopy. , 2006, Scanning.

[23]  M. Teaford A review of dental microwear and diet in modern mammals. , 1988, Scanning microscopy.

[24]  C. A. Brown,et al.  Describing ground surface texture using contact profilometry and fractal analysis , 1991 .

[25]  Christopher A. Brown,et al.  Fractal analysis of topographic data by the patchwork method , 1993 .

[26]  A. Walker,et al.  Interpreting the diet of extinct ruminants: the case of a non-browsing giraffid , 1988, Paleobiology.

[27]  Hans Nørgaard Hansen,et al.  Quantitative Characterisation of Surface Texture , 2000 .

[28]  A. Estrada Resource use by howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in the rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico , 1984, International Journal of Primatology.

[29]  A. Walker,et al.  Mecrowear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet. , 1978, Science.

[30]  Mark F. Teaford,et al.  Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth: Tooth tissues: development and evolution , 2000 .

[31]  C. Stanford,et al.  Behavioral Ecology of Sympatric Chimpanzees and Gorillas in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda: Diet , 2003, International Journal of Primatology.