Improving Packaged Software through Online Community Knowledge

Packaged software development (PSD) is largely a knowledge- intense activity. Thus, it depends on the organizational capability of developing and combining market and technical knowledge into timely and competitive software products. Given customers' situated knowledge of the software, soft- ware firms increasingly seek new ways to involve customers in their software development activities. As highlighted in the literature, one path for doing this is to use online communities. However, there exists little empirical research that examines the role that communities can play in the commercial endeavor of PSD. To address this omission, this paper examines the benefits and limits of online community use in PSD as it unfolds at the intersection between com- mercial software firm practices and voluntary community participation. On the basis of this examination, the paper presents implications for both research and practice.

[1]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[2]  Vijayan Sugumaran,et al.  A framework for creating hybrid‐open source software communities , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  G. Pascal Zachary,et al.  Show Stopper!: The Breakneck Race to Create Windows NT and the Next Generation at Microsoft , 1994 .

[4]  C. Prahalad,et al.  THE CORE COMPETENCY OF THE CORPORATION , 1990 .

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[7]  Kressel,et al.  Competing for the Future , 2007 .

[8]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Byron J. Finch.  Internet discussions as a source for consumer product customer involvement and quality information: an exploratory study , 1999 .

[11]  Helena Holmström Olsson,et al.  Customer Role Ambiguity in Community Management , 2002, HICSS.

[12]  Amy Jo Kim,et al.  Community building on the Web , 2000 .

[13]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[14]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[15]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[16]  G. Hutton.  Net gain: Expanding markets through virtual communities , 1998 .

[17]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[19]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Packaged software development teams: what makes them different? , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[21]  Richard W. Selby,et al.  Microsoft Secrets-How the World''s Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology , 1995 .

[22]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[24]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[25]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users , 1991, Computer.

[26]  Robert E. Cole,et al.  From a Firm-Based to a Community-Based Model of Knowledge Creation: The Case of the Linux Kernel Development , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Annette N. Markham,et al.  Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space , 1998 .

[28]  Todd Little,et al.  Value creation and capture: a model of the software development process , 2004, IEEE Software.

[29]  Daniel Robey,et al.  A Social Process Model of User-Analyst Relationships , 1992, MIS Q..

[30]  Ruth Milkman,et al.  Microsoft Secrets: How the World's Most Powerful Software Company Creates Technology, Shapes Markets, and Manages People , 1995 .

[31]  V. Bakthavatsalam,et al.  Windows of opportunity , 2001 .

[32]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Software development: Knowledge-intensive work organizations , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  Chris Abts.  COTS-Based Systems (CBS) Functional Density -- A Heuristic for Better CBS Design , 2002, ICCBSS.

[34]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[35]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Community of Practice: A Metaphor for Online Design? , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[36]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[37]  Watts S. Humphrey,et al.  Managing the software process , 1989, The SEI series in software engineering.

[38]  Steven Sawyer,et al.  Packaged software: implications of the differences from custom approaches to software development , 2000, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  DESIGNING VIRTUAL CUSTOMER ENVIRONMENTS FOR NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT : TOWARD A THEORY , 2005 .

[40]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  Improving Software Organizations: From Principles to Practice , 2001 .

[41]  Helena Holmström Olsson,et al.  Developing e-commerce in internetworked organizations: a case of customer involvement throughout the computer gaming value chain , 2002, DATB.

[42]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice and social learning systems”. Organization :. , 2000 .

[43]  Jan Ljungberg,et al.  Open source movements as a model for organising , 2000, ECIS.

[44]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  Organisational learning and core capabilities development: the role of IT , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[45]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Organizational learning and core capabilities development: the role of IT , 1998 .

[46]  Joe Nandhakumar,et al.  Too close for comfort? Distance and engagement in interpretive information systems research , 1997, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[48]  Erran Carmel,et al.  Customer-developer links in software development , 1995, CACM.

[49]  Helena Holström,et al.  Virtual Communities as Platforms for Product Development: An Interpretive Case Study of Customer Involvement in Online Game Development , 2001, ICIS.

[50]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Understanding open source software development , 2002 .