SECTOR-SPECIFIC PATTERNS OF ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN CHANGE*

Recent approaches to understanding change in organizations have moved beyond just looking at structure and have focused on the role of values in defining the manner in which organizations change. This article integrates the concepts of design archetypes, tracks and high impact systems in an effort to understand the patterns of change for an institutionally specific set of organizations. the sample used for the study was a set of Canadian national sport organizations undergoing institutional change. Three design archetypes (Kitchen Table, Boardroom and Executive Office) that represent institutionally specific coherent value-structure relationships were used to show that patterns of change are determined by the extent to which the coherence of organizational design elements shift over time. Using these design archetypes as a model for change, tracks were identified that provided an indication of the degree and direction of change and the extent to which design coherence was maintained. This paper shows that there is variety in organizational design coherence and that this is related to patterns of change. In addition, reorientations to a new design are signalled by changes in structures or systems that are central to the organization's purpose and as such can have a high impact on moving the organization to a new design.

[1]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .

[2]  Bob Hinings,et al.  Institutionally Specific Design Archetypes: A Framework for Understanding Change in National Sport Organizations , 1992 .

[3]  T. Slack,et al.  Understanding Change in National Sport Organizations: An Integration of Theoretical Perspectives , 1992 .

[4]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  CHANGE IN AN AUTONOMOUS PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION , 1991 .

[5]  T. Slack,et al.  Professionalism, Structures and Systems: The Impact of Professional Staff on Voluntary Sport Organizations , 1991 .

[6]  Richard Laughlin,et al.  Environmental Disturbances and Organizational Transitions and Transformations: Some Alternative Models , 1991 .

[7]  C. Gersick.  REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE THEORIES: A MULTILEVEL EXPLORATION OF THE PUNCTUATED EQUILIBRIUM PARADIGM , 1991 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Studying Deciding: An Exchange of Views Between Mintzberg and Waters, Pettigrew, and Butler , 1990 .

[9]  Ann Langley,et al.  Patterns in the Use of Formal Analysis in Strategic Decisions , 1990 .

[10]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Strategic Choice and Strategic Change. A Comment on Mintzberg and Waters: 'Does Decision Get in the Way?' , 1990 .

[11]  L. Greiner.  Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow , 1997 .

[12]  A Langley,et al.  In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. , 1989, Administrative science quarterly.

[13]  David A. Nadler,et al.  Organizational Frame Bending: Principles for Managing Reorientation , 1989 .

[14]  T. Slack,et al.  A Structural Taxonomy of Amateur Sport Organizations , 1989 .

[15]  T. Slack.  Values and beliefs: their role in the structuring of national sport organizations. , 1989 .

[16]  D. Whitson.  The professionalization of Canadian amateur sport: questions of power and purpose. , 1989 .

[17]  D. Dunphy,et al.  Transformational and Coercive Strategies for Planned Organizational Change: Beyond the O.D. Model , 1988 .

[18]  Royston Greenwood,et al.  Organizational Design Types, Tracks and the Dynamics of Strategic Change , 1988 .

[19]  John Child,et al.  On Organizations in Their Sectors , 1988 .

[20]  John Child,et al.  THE CONTEXT AND PROCESS OF ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION ‐ CADBURY LIMITED IN ITS SECTOR , 1987 .

[21]  D. Meyerson,et al.  CULTURAL CHANGE: AN INTEGRATION OF THREE DIFFERENT VIEWS[1] , 1987 .

[22]  A. Pettigrew.  Context and Action in the Transformation of the Firm , 1987 .

[23]  Danny Miller,et al.  The Genesis of Configuration , 1987 .

[24]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[25]  Elaine Romanelli,et al.  Convergence and Upheaval: Managing the Unsteady Pace of Organizational Evolution , 1986 .

[26]  J. Bartunek.  Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order , 1984 .

[27]  S. Barley.  Semiotics and the Study of Occupational and Organizational Cultures. , 1983 .

[28]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[29]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  Industry influences on strategy reformulation , 1982 .

[30]  John R. Kimberly,et al.  Issues in the Design of Longitudinal Organizational Research , 1976 .

[31]  Roger Mansfield,et al.  Bureaucracy and Centralization: An Examination of Organizational Structure. , 1973 .

[32]  John Child,et al.  Strategies of Control and Organizational Behavior , 1973 .

[33]  J. Child.  Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[34]  D. Pugh.  An Empirical Taxonomy of Structures of Work Organizations. , 1969 .

[35]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .