AN ANALYSIS OF FATAL WORK ZONE CRASHES IN TEXAS

This report documents the data collection at and analysis of 77 fatal work zone crash sites throughout Texas from February 2003 through April 2004. The methodology used to collect the data for this project included a site analysis after notification by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) of each fatal crash. This project allowed an in-depth analysis of fatal work zone locations in Texas by supporting the collection of data regarding work zone configuration and characteristics that are generally not made available through the Department of Public Safety Crash Database or traditional police crash report forms. Based on these investigations, researchers concluded that only 8% of the investigated crashes had a direct influence from the work zone, whereas 39% of the investigated crashes had an indirect influence from the work zone. Researchers also concluded that 45% of the investigated crashes appeared to have no influence from the work zone (included in this subset are the 16% of the investigated crashes which occurred in work zones that were work zones in name only, such as work zones that consisted only of project limit signing). The crash investigations also provided unique insights into how and what characteristics of the work zones might have played some type of role in the overall chain-of-events for each crash. Researchers utilized this information in generating a series of possible crash countermeasures to intervene in the crash chain-of-events where plausible. Researchers critiqued each countermeasure and arrived at a final list of eight strategies that TxDOT should consider adopting or pursue further with research and development efforts.

[1]  H D Robertson,et al.  RESEARCH IN WORK ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL: STATUS REPORT , 1979 .

[2]  S D Schrock,et al.  FEASIBILITY, LENGTH, AND SPACING OF ENFORCEMENT PULLOUT AREAS FOR WORK ZONES , 2001 .

[3]  T A Ranney,et al.  Motor vehicle crashes in roadway construction workzones: an analysis using narrative text from insurance claims. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  D Fleury,et al.  Accident prototypical scenarios, a tool for road safety research and diagnostic studies. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Zoltan Anthony Nemeth,et al.  ACCIDENT CHARACTERISTICS BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER SAFETY UPGRADING PROJECTS ON OHIO'S RURAL INTERSTATE SYSTEM , 1978 .

[6]  James E Bryden,et al.  Work Zone Traffic Accidents Involving Traffic Control Devices, Safety Features, and Construction Operations , 1998 .

[7]  Russell M Lewis.  WORK-ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL CONCEPTS AND TERMINOLOGY , 1989 .

[8]  K. Dixon,et al.  Analysis of Fatal Crashes in Georgia Work Zones , 2000 .

[9]  Nagui M. Rouphail,et al.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SHORT- AND LONG-TERM URBAN FREEWAY WORK ZONES , 1988 .

[10]  R F Pain,et al.  MOTORIST INFORMATION NEEDS IN WORK ZONES , 1979 .

[11]  J W Hall,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF CONSTRUCTION-ZONE ACCIDENTS , 1989 .

[12]  Gerald L Ullman,et al.  TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND ENFORCEMENT TOOLS TO IMPROVE WORK ZONE SAFETY , 2002 .

[13]  Jun Wang,et al.  Investigation of Highway Work Zone Crashes: What We Know and What We Don't Know , 1996 .

[14]  Gerald L Ullman,et al.  Revisiting the Influence of Crash Report Forms on Work Zone Crash Data , 2004 .

[15]  N J Garber,et al.  Crash characteristics at work zones. , 2001 .

[16]  Jerry L Graham,et al.  ACCIDENT AND SPEED STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION ZONES , 1977 .

[17]  H L Ross,et al.  CONCEPTS AND CLASSIFICATION OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENT CAUSES , 1960 .