Prognostic Value of Serial Measurements of sST 2 and Galectin-3 in Ambulatory Chronic Heart Failure Patients

Background: B-type natriuretic peptides (BNP) and troponin T (cTnT) predict cardiovascular events in heart failure (HF) patients, but additional refinement in risk stratification may be possible by targeting pathways leading to fibrosis. We aimed to assess the value of serial measurements of sST2 ( soluble ST2) and galectin-3 to identify risk for adverse pathophysiological processes. Methods: Class III-IV HF patients (N=180; LVEF ≤40%)) were prospectively evaluated with biomarkers collected every 3 months over 2 years and analyzed in relation to primary end-point of death/cardiac transplantation and the secondary end-point of heart failure-related hospitalization or death/transplantation. Results: Time-dependent univariate analyses demonstrated that elevations of sST2 ( ≥49.3ng/mL male, ≥33.5ng/mL female) and galectin-3 ( ≥22.1ng/mL) were predictive of the primary and secondary endpoints. In multivariate models adjusted for BNP, cTnT, and clinical variables, sST2 but not galectin-3 remained an independent predictor (HR 3.22, 1.76-5.89, p<0.001). With serial measurements only sST2 demonstrated incremental value in reclassifying patients to higher risk. Conclusions: Serial monitoring of sST2 (indicative of myocardial fibrosis and remodeling) and cTnT (reflecting myocardial injury) identifies highest-risk HF outpatients and may be valuable to guide patient tailored therapy during follow up evaluations. Serial galectin-3 monitoring in ambulatory HF patients may not be of benefit.

[1]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Biomarkers in heart failure: the importance of inconvenient details , 2015, ESC heart failure.

[2]  Thomas J. Wang,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of serial soluble ST2, growth differentiation factor-15, and highly-sensitive troponin T measurements in patients with chronic heart failure. , 2014, JACC. Heart failure.

[3]  M. Drazner,et al.  2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. , 2013, Circulation.

[4]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Biological variation of galectin-3 and soluble ST2 for chronic heart failure: implication on interpretation of test results. , 2013, American heart journal.

[5]  D. Levy,et al.  Galectin-3, a marker of cardiac fibrosis, predicts incident heart failure in the community. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Gottdiener,et al.  Cardiac Microinjury Measured by Troponin T Predicts Collagen Metabolism in Adults Aged ≥65 Years With Heart Failure , 2012, Circulation. Heart failure.

[7]  Karen A. Hartman,et al.  Serial measurements of midregion proANP and copeptin in ambulatory patients with heart failure: incremental prognostic value of novel biomarkers in heart failure , 2011, Heart.

[8]  Thomas Lumley,et al.  American Journal of Epidemiology Practice of Epidemiology Evaluating the Incremental Value of New Biomarkers with Integrated Discrimination Improvement , 2022 .

[9]  Hans L Hillege,et al.  Predictive value of plasma galectin-3 levels in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction , 2010, Annals of medicine.

[10]  A. Wu,et al.  Multi-center determination of galectin-3 assay performance characteristics: Anatomy of a novel assay for use in heart failure. , 2010, Clinical biochemistry.

[11]  T. Mueller,et al.  Analytical and clinical evaluation of a novel high-sensitivity assay for measurement of soluble ST2 in human plasma--the Presage ST2 assay. , 2009, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[12]  M. Pencina,et al.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  Karen A. Hartman,et al.  Serial Biomarker Measurements in Ambulatory Patients With Chronic Heart Failure: The Importance of Change Over Time , 2007, Circulation.

[14]  M. Konstam Reliability of ventricular remodeling as a surrogate for use in conjunction with clinical outcomes in heart failure. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  R. McKelvie,et al.  Practical recommendations for the use of ACE inhibitors, beta‐blockers, aldosterone antagonists and angiotensin receptor blockers in heart failure: Putting guidelines into practice , 2005, European journal of heart failure.

[16]  D. Dávila,et al.  Mechanisms of neurohormonal activation in chronic congestive heart failure: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. , 2005, International journal of cardiology.

[17]  R. Latini,et al.  Severity of left ventricular remodeling defines outcomes and response to therapy in heart failure , 2004 .

[18]  D. DeMets,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable defibrillator in advanced chronic heart failure. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  I. Squire,et al.  Pre‐discharge, but not admission, levels of NT‐proBNP predict adverse prognosis following acute LVF , 2003, European journal of heart failure.

[20]  G. Eknoyan,et al.  National Kidney Foundation Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation, Classification, and Stratification , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  L. Fisher,et al.  Changes in Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Norepinephrine Over Time and Mortality and Morbidity in the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) , 2003, Circulation.

[22]  A. Dreher Modeling Survival Data Extending The Cox Model , 2016 .

[23]  W. Kremers,et al.  Concordance for Survival Time Data: Fixed and Time-Dependent Covariates and Possible Ties in Predictor and Time , 2007 .