Evolution and Control of Imprinted FWA Genes in the Genus Arabidopsis

A central question in genomic imprinting is how a specific sequence is recognized as the target for epigenetic marking. In both mammals and plants, imprinted genes are often associated with tandem repeats and transposon-related sequences, but the role of these elements in epigenetic gene silencing remains elusive. FWA is an imprinted gene in Arabidopsis thaliana expressed specifically in the female gametophyte and endosperm. Tissue-specific and imprinted expression of FWA depends on DNA methylation in the FWA promoter, which is comprised of two direct repeats containing a sequence related to a SINE retroelement. Methylation of this element causes epigenetic silencing, but it is not known whether the methylation is targeted to the SINE-related sequence itself or the direct repeat structure is also necessary. Here we show that the repeat structure in the FWA promoter is highly diverse in species within the genus Arabidopsis. Four independent tandem repeat formation events were found in three closely related species. Another related species, A. halleri, did not have a tandem repeat in the FWA promoter. Unexpectedly, even in this species, FWA expression was imprinted and the FWA promoter was methylated. In addition, our expression analysis of FWA gene in vegetative tissues revealed high frequency of intra-specific variation in the expression level. In conclusion, we show that the tandem repeat structure is dispensable for the epigenetic silencing of the FWA gene. Rather, SINE-related sequence is sufficient for imprinting, vegetative silencing, and targeting of DNA methylation. Frequent independent tandem repeat formation events in the FWA promoter led us to propose that they may be a consequence, rather than cause, of the epigenetic control. The possible significance of epigenetic variation in reproductive strategies during evolution is also discussed.

[1]  O. Mathieu,et al.  Transgenerational Stability of the Arabidopsis Epigenome Is Coordinated by CG Methylation , 2007, Cell.

[2]  R. Doerge,et al.  Epigenetic Natural Variation in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2007, PLoS biology.

[3]  Y. Kohara,et al.  Retrotransposon Silencing by DNA Methylation Can Drive Mammalian Genomic Imprinting , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[4]  T. Kakutani,et al.  Control of FWA gene silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana by SINE-related direct repeats. , 2006, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[5]  Xiaoyu Zhang,et al.  Two-Step Recruitment of RNA-Directed DNA Methylation to Tandem Repeats , 2006, PLoS biology.

[6]  B. Hutter,et al.  Tandem repeats in the CpG islands of imprinted genes. , 2006, Genomics.

[7]  Caroline Josefsson,et al.  Parent-Dependent Loss of Gene Silencing during Interspecies Hybridization , 2006, Current Biology.

[8]  A. Chess,et al.  An epigenetic state associated with areas of gene duplication. , 2006, Genome research.

[9]  Jon Penterman,et al.  DEMETER DNA Glycosylase Establishes MEDEA Polycomb Gene Self-Imprinting by Allele-Specific Demethylation , 2006, Cell.

[10]  H. Kudoh,et al.  Arabidopsis kamchatica (Fisch. ex DC.) K. Shimizu & Kudoh and A. kamchatica subsp. kawasakiana (Makino) K. Shimizu & Kudoh, New Combinations , 2005 .

[11]  Mattias Jakobsson,et al.  The Pattern of Polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2005, PLoS biology.

[12]  R. Doerge,et al.  Genomic changes in synthetic Arabidopsis polyploids. , 2004, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[13]  Michael Black,et al.  Role of transposable elements in heterochromatin and epigenetic control , 2004, Nature.

[14]  K. Mitsuya,et al.  Tandem Repeat Hypothesis in Imprinting: Deletion of a Conserved Direct Repeat Element Upstream of H19 Has No Effect on Imprinting in the Igf2-H19 Region , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  E. Li,et al.  Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting , 2004, Nature.

[16]  Yeonhee Choi,et al.  One-Way Control of FWA Imprinting in Arabidopsis Endosperm by DNA Methylation , 2004, Science.

[17]  R. Martienssen,et al.  Distinct Mechanisms Determine Transposon Inheritance and Methylation via Small Interfering RNA and Histone Modification , 2003, PLoS biology.

[18]  R. Martienssen,et al.  Maintenance of heterochromatin by RNA interference of tandem repeats , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[19]  J. Paszkowski,et al.  Maintenance of CpG methylation is essential for epigenetic inheritance during plant gametogenesis , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[20]  S. Jacobsen,et al.  Role of CG and Non-CG Methylation in Immobilization of Transposons in Arabidopsis , 2003, Current Biology.

[21]  J. Jeddeloh,et al.  Arabidopsis MET1 cytosine methyltransferase mutants. , 2003, Genetics.

[22]  S. Jacobsen,et al.  DEMETER, a DNA Glycosylase Domain Protein, Is Required for Endosperm Gene Imprinting and Seed Viability in Arabidopsis , 2002, Cell.

[23]  V. Rakyan,et al.  Metastable epialleles in mammals. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[24]  F. Berger,et al.  Maternal control of seed development. , 2001, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[25]  T. Kakutani,et al.  Mobilization of transposons by a mutation abolishing full DNA methylation in Arabidopsis , 2001, Nature.

[26]  R. Martienssen,et al.  Robertson's Mutator transposons in A. thaliana are regulated by the chromatin-remodeling gene Decrease in DNA Methylation (DDM1). , 2001, Genes & development.

[27]  J. P. Jackson,et al.  The late flowering phenotype of fwa mutants is caused by gain-of-function epigenetic alleles of a homeodomain gene. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[28]  S. Gangloff,et al.  Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". , 2000, Genes & development.

[29]  E. Coen,et al.  An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry , 1999, Nature.

[30]  M. Davey,et al.  Urea improves efficiency of bisulphite-mediated sequencing of 5'-methylcytosine in genomic DNA. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[31]  T. Kakutani.  Genetic characterization of late-flowering traits induced by DNA hypomethylation mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1997, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[32]  C. Walsh,et al.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[33]  M. Oshimura,et al.  Mouse U2af1-rs1 is a neomorphic imprinted gene , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  J. S. Heslop-Harrison,et al.  Analysis of a repetitive DNA family from Arabidopsis arenosa and relationships between Arabidopsis species , 1995, Plant Molecular Biology.

[35]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting , 1993, Nature.

[36]  DP Barlow.  Methylation and imprinting: from host defense to gene regulation? , 1993, Science.

[37]  M. Koornneef,et al.  A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1991, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[38]  N. Saitou,et al.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. , 1987, Molecular biology and evolution.

[39]  Petter Gustafsson,et al.  Two-dimensional graphic analysis of DNA sequence homologies , 1982, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  Jeffrey H. Miller,et al.  Mutagenic deamination of cytosine residues in DNA , 1980, Nature.

[41]  A. Bird.  DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[42]  E. Selker.  Genome defense and DNA methylation in Neurospora. , 2004, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[43]  C. Plass,et al.  Regulation of DNA methylation of Rasgrf1 , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[44]  D. Barlow,et al.  Characteristics of imprinted genes , 1995, Nature Genetics.