The AASHTO Highway Bridge Specifications penalize nonredundant steel members in bridges but present only rough and conservative guidelines for actually determining if a structure is redundant. These guidelines are based on the usual steel bridge design procedures, which in turn are based on oversimplified 2-dimensional idealizations of 3-dimensional structures. There is reason to believe that secondary members not specifically designed for vertical load actually contribute greatly to the redundancy of the bridge, providing a contribution to load redistribution capability not currently accounted for in design. This report describes a computer study investigating the hypothesis that a welded steel 2-girder bridge, commonly thought to be nonredundant, actually possesses significant load redistribution capability provided by such secondary members as the floor beams, cross frames, and bottom laterals. A finite element model of a real simple-span right 2-girder bridge is developed and subjected to dead load while imposing a full depth main girder crack and midspan. The results provide significant insights into the structural behavior and load redistribution mechanisms of the damaged bridge under dead load.
[1]
John W. Fisher,et al.
ANALYSIS OF CRACKING OF I79 BRIDGE AT NEVILLE ISLAND
,
1985
.
[2]
John T. DeWolf,et al.
Cross-Bracing Design
,
1979
.
[3]
William C. Schnobrich,et al.
Nonlinear Layered Analysis of RC Plates and Shells
,
1973
.
[4]
Conrad P. Heins,et al.
USER'S MANUAL FOR THE STATIC ANALYSIS OF CURVED BRIDGE GRIDERS
,
1974
.
[5]
Conrad P. Heins,et al.
Load Redistribution of Cracked Girders
,
1982
.
[6]
Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.
Design methods for reducing the risk of progressive collapse in buildings
,
1977
.
[7]
John M. Kulicki,et al.
THE INELASTIC ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SLABS
,
1974
.
[8]
Conrad P. Heins,et al.
Bridge Redundancy: Effects of Bracing
,
1980
.
[9]
Louis P. Schwendeman,et al.
Bolted Repair of Fractured I-79 Girder
,
1978
.