The Influence of Federal Laboratory R&D on Industrial Research

This paper studies the influence of R&D in the U.S. federal laboratory system, the world's largest, on firm research. Our results are based on a sample of 220 industrial research laboratories that work with a variety of federal laboratories and agencies and are owned by 115 firms in the chemicals, machinery, electrical equipment, and motor vehicles industries. Using an indicator of their importance to R&D managers, we find that cooperative research and development agreements (CRADAs) dominate other channels of technology transfer from federal laboratories to firms. With a CRADA industry laboratories patent more, spend more on company-financed R&D, and devote more resources to their federal counterparts. Without this influence, patenting stays about the same, and only federally funded R&D increases, mostly because of government support. The Stevenson-Wydler Act and amendments during the 1980s introduced CRADAs, which legally bind federal laboratories and firms together in joint research. In theory the agreements could capitalize on complementarities between public and private research. Our results support this perspective and suggest that CRADAs may be more beneficial to firms than other interactions with federal laboratories, precisely because of the mutual effort that they demand from both parties.

[1]  R. Henderson,et al.  Public-private interaction in pharmaceutical research. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Improving the effectiveness of public-private R&D collaboration: case studies at a US weapons laboratory , 1998 .

[3]  M. Feldman.  The Entrepreneurial Event Revisited: Firm Formation in a Regional Context , 2001 .

[4]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  State Versus Private Ownership , 1998 .

[5]  A. Pakes,et al.  Patents and R&D at the Firm Level: A First Look , 1984 .

[6]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The “Gradient Effect” in Federal Laboratory‐Industry Technology Transfer Partnerships , 2004 .

[7]  Joan Fowler.  Federal Funds for Research and Development , 1969 .

[8]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[9]  James D. Adams,et al.  Research Productivity in a System of Universities , 1996 .

[10]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Reinventing Public R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies , 2001 .

[11]  John Roberts,et al.  The Boundaries of the Firm Revisited , 1998 .

[12]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Privatizing R&D: Patent Policy and the Commercialization of National Laboratory Technologies , 1999 .

[13]  Michael Oden,et al.  National laboratories as business incubators and region builders , 1996 .

[14]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .

[15]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry , 1992 .

[16]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[17]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[18]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[19]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Who Does R&D and Who Patents? , 1982 .

[20]  Edwin Mansfield,et al.  A Note on the Accuracy of Industrial Forecasts of the Profitability of New Products and Processes , 1978 .

[21]  Michael Friendly,et al.  Discrete Distributions , 2005, Probability and Bayesian Modeling.

[22]  O. Hart,et al.  The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons , 1996 .

[23]  C. Engel,et al.  The Proper Scope of Government , 2001 .

[24]  L R Cohen,et al.  The future of the national laboratories. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies , 1999 .

[26]  James D. Adams,et al.  Industrial R&D Laboratories: Windows on Black Boxes? * , 2004 .

[27]  Evan D. Anderson.  Department of Defense In-House RDT/E Activities , 1970 .

[28]  William Gould,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation with stata , 1999 .

[29]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[30]  James D. Adams,et al.  The Structure of Firm R&D, the Factor Intensity of Production, and Skill Bias , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[31]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[32]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  Research and Productivity in Wheat and Maize , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[33]  J. Heckman.  Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System , 1977 .