Does This Patient Have Clubbing

Context The association between digital clubbing and a host of diseases has been recognized since the time of Hippocrates. Although the features of advanced clubbing are familiar to most clinicians, the presence of early clubbing is often a source of debate. Objective To perform a systematic review of the literature for information on the precision and accuracy of clinical examination for clubbing. Data Sources The MEDLINE database from January 1966 to April 1999 was searched for English-language articles related to clubbing. Bibliographies of all retrieved articles and of standard textbooks of physical diagnosis were also searched. Study Selection Studies selected for data extraction were those in which quantitative or qualitative assessment for clubbing was described in a series of patients. Sixteen studies met these criteria and were included in the final analysis. Data Extraction Data were extracted by both authors, who independently reviewed and appraised the quality of each article. Data extracted included quantitative indices for distinguishing clubbed from normal digits, precision of clinical examination for clubbing, and accuracy of clubbing as a marker of selected diseases. Data Synthesis The profile angle, hyponychial angle, and phalangeal depth ratio can be used as quantitative indices to assist in identifying clubbing. In individuals without clubbing, values for these indices do not exceed 176°, 192°, and 1.0, respectively. When clinicians make a global assessment of clubbing at the bedside, interobserver agreement is variable, with κ values ranging between 0.39 and 0.90. Because of the lack of an objective diagnostic criterion standard, accuracy of physical examination for clubbing is difficult to determine. The accuracy of clubbing as a marker of specific underlying disease has been determined for lung cancer (likelihood ratio, 3.9 with phalangeal depth ratio in excess of 1.0) and for inflammatory bowel disease (likelihood ratio, 2.8 and 3.7 for active Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis, respectively, if clubbing is present). Conclusions We recommend use of the profile angle and phalangeal depth ratio as quantitative indices in identifying clubbing. Clinical judgment must be exercised in determining the extent of further evaluation for underlying disease when these values exceed 180° and 1.0, respectively.

[1]  M. A. Spiteri,et al.  RELIABILITY OF ELICITING PHYSICAL SIGNS IN EXAMINATION OF THE CHEST , 1988, The Lancet.

[2]  Bigler Fc The morphology of clubbing. , 1958 .

[3]  J. L. Lovibond DIAGNOSIS OF CLUBBED FINGERS , 1938 .

[4]  G. Kitis,et al.  Finger clubbing in inflammatory bowel disease: its prevalence and pathogenesis. , 1979, British medical journal.

[5]  R. Lampe,et al.  Detection of Clubbing—Schamroth's Sign , 1983, Clinical pediatrics.

[6]  D. Simel,et al.  Does the clinical examination predict airflow limitation? , 1995, JAMA.

[7]  Harvey Rl Clubbing and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. , 1959, JAMA.

[8]  M. Miller,et al.  Finger clubbing in cystic fibrosis. , 1986, Archives of disease in childhood.

[9]  P. Armitage,et al.  The Measurement of Observer Disagreement in the Recording of Signs , 1966 .

[10]  C. Dickinson The aetiology of clubbing and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy , 1993, European journal of clinical investigation.

[11]  P. Stavem Instrument for estimation of clubbing. , 1959, Lancet.

[12]  P. Armitage,et al.  OBSERVER DISAGREEMENT IN PHYSICAL SIGNS OF THE RESPIRATORY SYSTEM. , 1965, Lancet.

[13]  R. L. Wolf,et al.  Digital capillary blood flow in clubbing. 85 Kr studies in hereditary and acquired cases. , 1971, Annals of internal medicine.

[14]  Mary Jane Leak A PERSONAL EXPERIENCE , 1924, Caridad, ciencia y arte.

[15]  R. Sly,et al.  Objective assessment for digital clubbing in Caucasian, Negro, and Oriental subjects. , 1973, Chest.

[16]  D. Buchman,et al.  Idiopathic clubbing and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of internal medicine.

[17]  C. Coury Hippocration fingers and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy. A study of 350 cases. , 1960, British journal of diseases of the chest.

[18]  M. Thomson,et al.  Subjective assessment and objective measurement of finger clubbing. , 1967, Lancet.

[19]  R. Baughman,et al.  Prevalence of digital clubbing in bronchogenic carcinoma by a new digital index. , 1998, Clinical and experimental rheumatology.

[20]  H. Shwachman,et al.  FINGER CLUBBING: A QUANTITATIVE SURVEY BY ANALYSIS OF THE SHADOWGRAPH , 1976, The Lancet.

[21]  C. Coury Hippocratic fingers and hypertrophic osteoarthropathy , 1960 .

[22]  T. Keens,et al.  Digital clubbing and pulmonary function abnormalities in children with lung disease , 1991, Pediatric pulmonology.

[23]  A. Mathé,et al.  Relationships among digital clubbing, disease severity, and serum prostaglandins F2alpha and E concentrations in cystic fibrosis patients. , 1978, The American review of respiratory disease.

[24]  L. Cudkowicz,et al.  An evaluation of the clinical significance of clubbing in common lung disorders. , 1957, The British journal of tuberculosis and diseases of the chest.

[25]  D. Sinniah,et al.  Quantitation of digital clubbing by shadowgram technique. , 1979, Archives of disease in childhood.

[26]  M. Mendlowitz CLUBBING AND HYPERTROPHIC OSTEOARTHROPATHY , 1942 .

[27]  J. W. Hewson,et al.  Unilateral clubbing of the fingernails in patients with hemiplegia. , 1975, Gerontologia clinica.

[28]  R. Mellins,et al.  Digital Casts for the Study of Clubbing of the Fingers , 1966, Circulation.