Delivery efficiency of an Elekta linac under gated operation

In this study, we have characterized the efficiency of an Elekta linac in the delivery of gated radiotherapy. We have explored techniques to reduce the beam‐on delay and to improve the delivery efficiency, and have investigated the impact of frequent beam interruptions on the dosimetric accuracy of gated deliveries. A newly available gating interface was installed on an Elekta Synergy. Gating signals were generated using a surface mapping system in conjunction with a respiratory motion phantom. A series of gated deliveries were performed using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans previously generated for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Baseline values were determined for the delivery times. The machine was then tuned in an effort to minimize beam‐on delays and improve delivery efficiency. After that process was completed, the dosimetric accuracy of the gated deliveries was evaluated by comparing the measured and the planned coronal dose distributions using gamma index analyses. Comparison of the gated and the non‐gated deliveries were also performed. The results demonstrated that, with the optimal machine settings, the average beam‐on delay was reduced to less than 0.22 s. High dosimetric accuracy was demonstrated with gamma index passing rates no lower than 99.0% for all tests (3%/3 mm criteria). Consequently, Elekta linacs can provide a practical solution for gated VMAT treatments with high dosimetric accuracy and only a moderate increase in the overall delivery time. PACS numbers: 87.56.bd, 87.55.de, 87.55.ne

[1]  Lei Xing,et al.  Dose verification for respiratory-gated volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  G J Budgell,et al.  Improved delivery efficiency for step and shoot intensity modulated radiotherapy using a fast-tuning magnetron. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  J. Wong,et al.  The use of active breathing control (ABC) to reduce margin for breathing motion. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  W. Schlegel,et al.  Accuracy of a commercial optical 3D surface imaging system for realignment of patients for radiotherapy of the thorax , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Ying Cui,et al.  Fluoroscopic gating without implanted fiducial markers for lung cancer radiotherapy based on support vector machines. , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  D. Yan,et al.  Coupling surface cameras with on-board fluoroscopy: a feasibility study. , 2011, Medical physics.

[7]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Quality assurance of a system for improved target localization and patient set-up that combines real-time infrared tracking and stereoscopic X-ray imaging. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Harry Keller,et al.  Application of the spirometer in respiratory gated radiotherapy. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[10]  H. Kubo,et al.  Respiration gated radiotherapy treatment: a technical study. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Stefania Pallotta,et al.  Accuracy of a 3D laser∕camera surface imaging system for setup verification of the pelvic and thoracic regions in radiotherapy treatments. , 2012, Medical physics.

[12]  Philip M. Evans,et al.  Gating characteristics of an Elekta radiotherapy treatment unit measured with three types of detector. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  X Allen Li,et al.  Technical and dosimetric aspects of respiratory gating using a pressure-sensor motion monitoring system. , 2005, Medical physics.

[14]  A. Bertelsen,et al.  Validation of a new control system for Elekta accelerators facilitating continuously variable dose rate. , 2011, Medical physics.

[15]  H D Kubo,et al.  Compatibility of Varian 2100C gated operations with enhanced dynamic wedge and IMRT dose delivery. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Physical aspects of a real-time tumor-tracking system for gated radiotherapy. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  L. Cozzi,et al.  Pre-clinical evaluation of respiratory-gated delivery of volumetric modulated arc therapy with RapidArc , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Time delay measurement for linac based treatment delivery in synchronized respiratory gating radiotherapy. , 2005, Medical physics.

[19]  Carl Rowbottom,et al.  The impact of continuously‐variable dose rate VMAT on beam stability, MLC positioning, and overall plan dosimetry , 2012, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[20]  Nzhde Agazaryan,et al.  The effects of tumor motion on planning and delivery of respiratory-gated IMRT. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  F. Wenz,et al.  A novel surface imaging system for patient positioning and surveillance during radiotherapy , 2013, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[22]  R D Wiersma,et al.  Examination of geometric and dosimetric accuracies of gated step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2007, Medical physics.

[23]  T. Solberg,et al.  Dosimetric characteristics of a new linear accelerator under gated operation , 2006, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.