Erim Report Series Research in Management the Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R & D Bibliographic Data and Classifications

textabstractThe integration of marketing and R&D is a major concern for companies that want to improve their new product performance (NPP). In order to integrate, companies are using mechanisms such as physical proximity, cross-functional teams, and job rotation. This study examines the relative effectiveness of these mechanisms by developing a model that distinguishes between indirect effects of mechanisms on NPP (i.e., through a higher level of integration) and direct effects. The model is tested with data collected from 148 pharmaceutical companies. By simultaneously studying a broad range of integrating mechanisms, we found that housing marketing and R&D closer to each other and using an influential cross-functional phase review board are highly effective mechanisms to increase integration. Using information and communication technology (ICT) more intensively, having equal remuneration and career opportunities for marketing and R&D and using more cross functional teams are also effective in producing more integration, although to a somewhat lesser extent. The effectiveness of personnel movement and informal social group events is rather low. Interestingly, ICT appears to be a very effective tool for enhancing NPP. ICT not only fosters integration, but in addition it has an independent direct positive effect on NPP, possibly through knowledge creation within marketing and R&D. We also found a direct effect on NPP of another mechanism: cross functional phase review boards. However, for this mechanism the direct effect is negative. So, notwithstanding its strong positive effect on integration, a price is paid in terms of NPP. This may be related to the amount of formalization and complexity accompanying this mechanism.

[1]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[2]  R. Calantone,et al.  Controllable Factors of New Product Success: A Cross-National Comparison , 1996 .

[3]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[4]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[5]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[6]  Tom R. Burns,et al.  The Management of Innovation. , 1963 .

[7]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[8]  Edward Barrett,et al.  Justice in the workplace , 1999 .

[9]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[10]  William E. Souder,et al.  Effectiveness of Nominal and Interacting Group Decision Processes for Integrating R&D and Marketing , 1977 .

[11]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  Using ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ technologies for global new product development , 1996 .

[12]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  The Effects of R&D Team Co-Location on Communication Patterns Among R&D, Marketing, and Manufacturing , 1998 .

[13]  R. Cooper,et al.  0 0 0 0 An Investigation into the New Product Process : Steps , Deficiencies , and Impact , 1986 .

[14]  A. Griffin,et al.  An Interim Report on Measuring Product Development Success and Failure , 1993 .

[15]  Robert G. Cooper.  Winning at new products second edition accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2002 .

[16]  W. Souder.  Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects☆ , 1988 .

[17]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process , 1986 .

[18]  Rebecca Henderson.  One Point of View: Drug Industry Mergers Won't Necessarily Benefit R&D , 2000 .

[19]  D. Larcker,et al.  The Performance Effects of Process Management Techniques , 1997 .

[20]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[22]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[23]  William E. Souder,et al.  Context and Antecedents of Information Utility at the R&D/Marketing Interface , 1996 .

[24]  Sanford Labovitz,et al.  The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories , 1970 .

[25]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation , 1977 .

[26]  Ajay K. Kohli,et al.  Reducing marketing’s conflict with other functions: The differential effects of integrating mechanisms , 2000 .

[27]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  The Development Factory: Unlocking the Potential of Process Innovation , 1996 .

[28]  J. Ettlie,et al.  Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical Versus Incremental Innovation , 1984 .

[29]  W. Souder,et al.  An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D Personnel in new product development projects , 1990 .

[30]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[31]  D. Deschoolmeester,et al.  R&D-marketing integration mechanisms, communication flows, and innovation success , 1994 .

[32]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[33]  Ikujiro Nonaka,et al.  Managing Industrial Knowledge: Creation, Transfer and Utilization , 2001 .

[34]  David Wilemon,et al.  The R&D-marketing interface in high-technology firms , 1985 .

[35]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[36]  Kenneth B. Kahn,et al.  Marketing's integration with other departments , 1998 .

[37]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1974 .

[38]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[39]  F. Damanpour.  Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis Of Effects Of Determinants and Moderators , 1991 .

[40]  Gerrit van Bruggen,et al.  Improving Decision Making by Means of a Marketing Decision Support System , 1998 .

[41]  A. Donnellon.  Crossfunctional Teams in Product Development: Accommodating the Structure to the Process , 1993 .

[42]  John S. Oakland,et al.  The impact of telephone notification strategies on response to an industrial mail survey , 1985 .

[43]  J. Pinto,et al.  Project team communication and cross-functional cooperation in new program development , 1990 .

[44]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[45]  R. Calantone,et al.  Determinants of New Product Performance: A Review and Meta-Analysis , 1994 .

[46]  D. Dillman.  Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[47]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[48]  Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp,et al.  The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. , 1991 .

[49]  M. Feldman,et al.  Electronic Mail and Organizational Communication: Does Saying Hi Really Matter? , 1998 .

[50]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .