Incorporating regional‐scale ecological knowledge to improve the effectiveness of large‐scale conservation programmes

Land‐stewardship programmes are a major focus of investment by governments for conserving biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. These programmes are generally large‐scale (e.g. >1000 km) spanning multiple biogeographic regions but developed using spatially limited (e.g. landscape‐scale; <100 km) ecological data interpolated across broad areas for one, or a few, well‐studied taxonomic groups. Information about how less‐studied taxa respond to regional differences in management and environmental effects has potential to further inform land‐stewardship conservation programmes, but suitable data sets are rarely available. In this study, we sought to enhance planning of large‐scale conservation programmes by quantifying relationships between reptile assemblages and key environmental attributes at regional scales within a large‐scale (>172 000 km2) Australian land‐stewardship programme. Using 234 remnant woodland monitoring sites spanning four distinct biogeographic regions, we asked: Do reptile assemblages show different environmental associations across biogeographically distinct regions? We found that environmental features important to reptile diversity differed over each region. Abundance and rare species richness of reptiles responded at regional‐scales to elevation, native groundcover and aspect. We identified four implications from our study: (1) large‐scale conservation schemes can achieve better outcomes for reptiles using regional‐scale knowledge of environmental associations; (2) regional‐scale knowledge is particularly valuable for conservation of rare reptile taxa; (3) consideration of abiotic environmental features which cannot be directly managed (e.g. aspect, elevation) is important; (4) programmes can be tailored to better support reptile groups at higher conservation risk. Our study shows that reptile‐environment associations differ among biogeographic regions, and this presents opportunity for tailoring stronger policy and management strategies for conserving large‐scale agricultural landscapes globally.

[1]  Tanja S. Maier,et al.  Choosing and using diversity indices : Insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity , 2017 .

[2]  Manuel K. Schneider,et al.  Strikingly high effect of geographic location on fauna and flora of European agricultural grasslands , 2015 .

[3]  David Kleijn,et al.  The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  Donald B. Fletcher,et al.  Eaten Out of House and Home: Impacts of Grazing on Ground-Dwelling Reptiles in Australian Grasslands and Grassy Woodlands , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  B. Cardinale,et al.  Biodiversity conservation in agriculture requires a multi-scale approach , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Tanja S. Maier,et al.  Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories , 2014, Ecology and evolution.

[7]  R. Claassen.  2014 Farm Act Continues Most Previous Trends In Conservation , 2014 .

[8]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  How effective are agri‐environment schemes for protecting and improving herpetofaunal diversity in Australian endangered woodland ecosystems? , 2014 .

[9]  Manuel K. Schneider,et al.  Responses of plants, earthworms, spiders and bees to geographic location, agricultural management and surrounding landscape in European arable fields , 2014 .

[10]  S. Erasmi,et al.  Functional beetle diversity in managed grasslands: effects of region, landscape context and land use intensity , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The law of diminishing returns: woodland birds respond to native vegetation cover at multiple spatial scales and over time , 2014 .

[12]  A. Stow,et al.  Higher genetic diversity is associated with stable water refugia for a gecko with a wide distribution in arid Australia , 2013 .

[13]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A list of reptiles and amphibians from Box Gum Grassy Woodlands in south-eastern Australia , 2013 .

[14]  D. Kleijn,et al.  Effects of grazing and biogeographic regions on grassland biodiversity in Hungary: analysing assemblages of 1200 species , 2013 .

[15]  Michael F. Hutchinson,et al.  New developments and applications in the ANUCLIM spatial climatic and bioclimatic modelling package , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[16]  A. S. Lobo,et al.  The conservation status of the world's reptiles , 2013 .

[17]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  A Novel and Cost-Effective Monitoring Approach for Outcomes in an Australian Biodiversity Conservation Incentive Program , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  S. McIntyre,et al.  Differential responses of plants, reptiles and birds to grazing management, fertilizer and tree clearing , 2012 .

[19]  F. Herzog,et al.  Interactive effects of landscape context constrain the effectiveness of local agri‐environmental management , 2012 .

[20]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Comparative use of active searches and artificial refuges to survey reptiles in temperate eucalypt woodlands , 2012, Wildlife Research.

[21]  D. Driscoll,et al.  Land Management Practices Associated with House Loss in Wildfires , 2012, PloS one.

[22]  D. Ramsey,et al.  Landscape and local influences on patterns of reptile occurrence in grazed temperate woodlands of southern Australia , 2011 .

[23]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  A. Perkins,et al.  Adaptive management and targeting of agri-environment schemes does benefit biodiversity: a case study of the corn bunting Emberiza calandra , 2011 .

[25]  M. Whittingham.  The future of agri‐environment schemes: biodiversity gains and ecosystem service delivery? , 2011 .

[26]  C. Marshall,et al.  Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? , 2011, Nature.

[27]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Biological Diversity: Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment , 2011 .

[28]  R. Shine,et al.  Removing forest canopy cover restores a reptile assemblage. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[29]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: a meta-analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Andre Zerger,et al.  Tree decline and the future of Australian farmland biodiversity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Temperate Woodland Conservation and Management , 2010 .

[32]  T. Arnold.  Uninformative Parameters and Model Selection Using Akaike's Information Criterion , 2010 .

[33]  C. McCain.  Global analysis of reptile elevational diversity , 2010 .

[34]  A. Zuur,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[35]  X. Santos,et al.  Biodiversity and Land uses at a regional scale: Is agriculture the biggest threat for reptile assemblages? , 2009 .

[36]  D. Driscoll,et al.  Common reptiles unaffected by connectivity or condition in a fragmented farming landscape , 2008 .

[37]  J. Krebs,et al.  Should conservation strategies consider spatial generality? Farmland birds show regional not national patterns of habitat association. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[38]  P. Bazzoffi,et al.  Agri‐Environment Measures and Soil Erosion in Europe , 2006 .

[39]  F. Herzog,et al.  Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[40]  Cristopher Brack,et al.  Fauna-habitat relationships: a basis for identifying key stand structural attributes in temperate Australian eucalypt forests and woodlands , 2006 .

[41]  C. Franklin,et al.  Physiological mechanisms of thermoregulation in reptiles: a review , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology B.

[42]  Bradford A. Hawkins,et al.  Energy, water and large-scale patterns of reptile and amphibian species richness in Europe , 2005 .

[43]  M. Hutchinson,et al.  Integrating a global agro‐climatic classification with bioregional boundaries in Australia , 2005 .

[44]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The sensitivity of lizards to elevation: A case study from south‐eastern Australia , 2005 .

[45]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection , 2004 .

[46]  Kevin McGarigal,et al.  Hierarchical, Multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[47]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Formal Inference From More Than One Model: Multimodel Inference (MMI) , 2004 .

[48]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity? , 2003 .

[49]  A. Guisan,et al.  Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography , 2003 .

[50]  C. Fabricius,et al.  Comparing biodiversity between protected areas and adjacent rangeland in xeric succulent thicket, South Africa: arthropods and reptiles , 2003 .

[51]  Steve K. Wilson,et al.  A Complete Guide to Reptiles of Australia , 2003 .

[52]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[53]  R. J. Berry,et al.  Environmental stewardship , 1994, Nature.

[54]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Edn. , 1990 .

[55]  A. Cossins,et al.  Temperature Biology of Animals , 1987 .