A synthetic aperture study of aperture size in the presence of noise and in vivo clutter

Conventional wisdom in ultrasonic array design drives development towards larger arrays because of the inverse relationship between aperture size and resolution. We propose a method using synthetic aperture beamforming to study image quality as a function of aperture size in simulation, in a phantom and in vivo. A single data acquisition can be beamformed to produce matched images with a range of aperture sizes, even in the presence of target motion. In this framework we evaluate the reliability of typical image quality metrics – speckle signal-tonoise ratio, contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio – for use in in vivo studies. Phantom and simulation studies are in good agreement in that there exists a point of diminishing returns in image quality at larger aperture sizes. We demonstrate challenges in applying and interpreting these metrics in vivo, showing results in hypoechoic vasculature regions. We explore the use of speckle brightness to describe image quality in the presence of in vivo clutter and underlying tissue inhomogeneities.

[1]  J. Arendt Paper presented at the 10th Nordic-Baltic Conference on Biomedical Imaging: Field: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems , 1996 .

[2]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[3]  G. Trahey,et al.  In Vivo Measurements of Ultrasonic Beam Distortion in the Breast , 1991 .

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Fundamental correlation lengths of coherent speckle in medical ultrasonic images , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Synthetic aperture imaging for small scale systems , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[6]  R C Waag,et al.  In vivo and in vitro ultrasound beam distortion measurements of a large aperture and a conventional aperture focussed transducer. , 1988, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[7]  K. Ranganathan,et al.  Cystic resolution: A performance metric for ultrasound imaging systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Influence of missing array elements on phase aberration correction for medical ultrasound , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Peter Grant,et al.  A Digital Synthetic Focus Acoustic Imaging System for NDE , 1978 .

[10]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Low Contrast Detectability and Contrast/Detail Analysis in Medical Ultrasound , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[11]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Detection performance theory for ultrasound imaging systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  S. W. Smith,et al.  Phase aberration correction in medical ultrasound using speckle brightness as a quality factor. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. O'Donnell,et al.  Coherence factor of speckle from a multi-row probe , 1999, 1999 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. International Symposium (Cat. No.99CH37027).

[14]  David Vilkomerson,et al.  Towards a resolution metric for medical ultrasonic imaging , 1995, 1995 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium.

[15]  J. Jensen,et al.  Calculation of pressure fields from arbitrarily shaped, apodized, and excited ultrasound transducers , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[16]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Phase-aberration correction using signals from point reflectors and diffuse scatterers: basic principles , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.