Memory-driven attentional capture is modulated by temporal task demands

Previous research has shown that attention is biased towards items that match the current content of working memory (memory-driven attentional capture), but it remains unclear whether this effect is automatic or under voluntary control. Participants memorized a colour for subsequent recall and searched for a target shape among distractors that included a colour singleton which matched or mismatched the memorized colour. Search displays were presented for 200 ms or until response execution. Display duration was blocked or randomly intermixed for different participants. Reaction times (RTs) were slower on trials with memory-matching distractors, reflecting memory-driven attentional capture. Only with blocked display durations, this effect was much smaller for short than for long displays. This demonstrates that attention tasks are prioritized and shielded from interactions with working memory when this is required by high temporal task demands, and suggests that memory-driven attentional capture is controlled by top-down processing strategies.

[1]  David Soto,et al.  The modulation of perceptual selection by working memory is dependent on the focus of spatial attention , 2010, Vision Research.

[2]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Competition in visual working memory for control of search , 2003 .

[4]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Automatic guidance of attention from working memory , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Stressing the mind: The effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[8]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Working memory can guide pop-out search , 2006, Vision Research.

[9]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  David Soto,et al.  Working memory enhances visual perception: evidence from signal detection analysis. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  G. Woodman,et al.  Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[13]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dividing the mind: The necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.