Statistical Practice Randomization of Clusters Versus Randomization of Persons Within Clusters: Which Is Preferable?

Many experiments aim at populations with persons nested within clusters. Randomization to treatment conditions can be done at the cluster level or at the person level within each cluster. The latter may result in control group contamination, and cluster randomization is therefore often preferred in practice. This article models the control group contamination, calculates the required sample sizes for both levels of randomization, and gives the degree of contamination for which cluster randomization is preferable above randomization of persons within clusters. Moreover, it provides examples of situations where one has to make a choice between both levels of randomization.

[1]  A. Sommer,et al.  IMPACT OF VITAMIN A SUPPLEMENTATION ON CHILDHOOD MORTALITY A Randomised Controlled Community Trial , 1986, The Lancet.

[2]  Y. Plétan,et al.  Rufloxacin once daily versus ciprofloxacin twice daily in the treatment of patients with acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[3]  M. Hovell,et al.  Cluster versus individual randomization in adolescent tobacco and alcohol studies: illustrations for design decisions. , 1997, International journal of epidemiology.

[4]  David J Torgerson,et al.  Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  David H. Greenberg,et al.  Multisite Employment and Training Program Evaluations: A Tale of Three Studies , 1994 .

[6]  Martijn P. F. Berger,et al.  OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR MULTILEVEL MODELS WITH COVARIATES , 2001 .

[7]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Analysis of clustered data in community psychology: With an example from a worksite smoking cessation project , 1994, American journal of community psychology.

[8]  R J Carroll,et al.  On design considerations and randomization-based inference for community intervention trials. , 1996, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  D. Hedeker,et al.  Random regression models for multicenter clinical trials data. , 1991, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[10]  A Donner,et al.  Methods for comparing event rates in intervention studies when the unit of allocation is a cluster. , 1994, American journal of epidemiology.

[11]  H. Marsh,et al.  Diffusion effects : Control group contamination threats to the validity of teacher-administered interventions , 2001 .

[12]  A. Donner,et al.  Randomization by cluster. Sample size requirements and analysis. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  Ilse Mesters,et al.  Short-term effects of a randomized computer-based out-of-school smoking prevention trial aimed at elementary schoolchildren. , 2002, Preventive medicine.

[14]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[15]  I. Plewis,et al.  A Multilevel Perspective on the Design and Analysis of Intervention Studies , 1998 .