Incremental Sentence Production, Self-Correction and Coordination

Since Garrett’s (1975, 1980) seminal work on speech error phenomena, it has become customary to distinguish four levels of representation within the sentence production process: a message level, a functional level, a positional level, and a phonetic level (see also Bock, this volume). Garrett’s model has been further elaborated and modified by Kempen (Kempen & Hoenkamp, in press; Van Wijk & Kempen, in press) who proposes the global sentence production model depicted in Figure 1. The four modules listed have the following functions: 1. The conceptual module forms a conceptual (semantic) representation of the message which the speaker wishes to communicate. The nature of the semantic structures output by this component need not concern us here. 2. The lexico-syntactic module constructs an ordered tree structure consisting of constituents and their functional relations. The terminal nodes of syntactic trees (both content and function words) are instances of abstract (not phonologically specified) lexical items called lemmas which are retrieved from the lexicon. While Garrett assigns the tasks of inserting function words and computing word order to a later module (the positional stage), Kempen assigns them to this one. 3. The morpho phonological module computes the word form of all lemmas by retrieving their phonological specifications (lexemes) from the lexicon and making various morphological and phonological adjustments. 4. The articulatory module produces a phonetic specification which is used to control the articulatory apparatus.

[1]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[2]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Aravind K. Joshi,et al.  Some Computational Properties of Tree Adjoining Grammars , 1985, ACL.

[4]  E.C.M. Hoenkamp,et al.  Een computermodel van de spreker: psychologische en linguistische aspecten , 1983 .

[5]  G. Kempen,et al.  A dual system for producing self-repairs in spontaneous speech: Evidence from experimentally elicited corrections , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[7]  M. Garrett Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[8]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  A Framework for Incremental Syntactic Tree Formation , 1987, IJCAI.

[9]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  TAG’s as a Grammatical Formalism for Generation , 1986, HLT.

[10]  Gerard Kempen Sentence Construction by a Psychologically Plausible Formulator , 1978 .

[11]  Robin N. Campbell,et al.  Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language , 1978 .

[12]  K. Vijay-Shankar,et al.  SOME COMPUTATIONAL PROPERTIES OF TREE ADJOINING GRAMMERS , 1985, ACL 1985.

[13]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  A Computational Theory of Prose Style for Natural Language Generation , 1985, EACL.

[14]  W. Levelt,et al.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech , 1983, Cognition.

[15]  Douglas E. Appelt TELEGRAM: A Grammar Formalism for Language Planning , 1983, IJCAI.