Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement

Abstract The overall quality of the landscape is important for conserving biodiversity. In a fragmented landscape, movement and dispersal capacity are important factors in determining which species are able to persist. To examine the role of landscape structure and pattern on movement, we developed a simple model to predict the “least-cost” pathway a species would take through an agricultural landscape matrix between habitat fragments by assigning friction values to different habitat types. Our model was validated by using empirical data on inter-patch movement for two butterfly species. As a measure of the ecological distance between habitat patches, the least-cost path model was a better predictor of butterfly movement than Euclidean distance. Ranking several hypothetical management scenarios, illustrated the potential of the model as a decision-support tool. Removal of all infrastructure from within arable fields would significantly reduce rates of inter-patch movement. However, if all boundaries between arable fields were restored to grassy banks this would significantly increase the connectivity between sub-populations. Planners widely recommend using corridors to connect fragments of remnant habitat despite relatively little empirical evidence to show that dispersal of individuals is enhanced by this practice. Our model showed that important aspects of species movement and, hence, survival can be expressed in models suitable for area planning and management.

[1]  S. Wratten,et al.  Permeability of hedgerows to predatory carabid beetles , 1995 .

[2]  Sigrid Hehl-Lange,et al.  Structural elements of the visual landscape and their ecological functions , 2001 .

[3]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology , 1997 .

[4]  Françoise Burel,et al.  Movements of Abax parallelepipedus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in woody habitats of a hedgerow network landscape: a radio-tracing study , 1997 .

[5]  Eric J. Gustafson,et al.  The Effect of Landscape Heterogeneity on the Probability of Patch Colonization , 1996 .

[6]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies , 1994 .

[7]  G. Fry,et al.  Experimental simulation of some visual and physical components of a hedge and the effects on butterfly behaviour in an agricultural landscape , 2001 .

[8]  T. O. Crist,et al.  Critical Thresholds in Species' Responses to Landscape Structure , 1995 .

[9]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFECTS OF HABITAT QUALITY AND LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE , 1998 .

[10]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial pattern and ecological analysis , 1989, Vegetatio.

[11]  M. Begon Investigating animal abundance : capture-recapture for biologists , 1979 .

[12]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning , 1992 .

[13]  K. Fischer,et al.  Population Structure, Mobility and Habitat Preferences of the Violet Copper Lycaena Helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Western Germany: Implications for Conservation , 1999, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[14]  E. Marshall,et al.  Distribution, Dispersal and Population Size of the Ground Beetles, Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) and Harpalus rufipes (Degeer) (Coleoptera, Carabidae), in Field Margin Habitats , 1997 .

[15]  James A. Cox,et al.  Movement Corridors: Conservation Bargains or Poor Investments? , 1992 .

[16]  R. Sokal,et al.  Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence , 1986 .

[17]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[18]  C. Vos,et al.  Landscape resistance and dispersal in fragmented populations: a case study of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an agricultural landscape. , 1997 .

[19]  Emilio M. Bruna,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and large‐scale conservation: what do we know for sure? , 1999 .

[20]  Brian Huntley,et al.  How Plants Respond to Climate Change: Migration Rates, Individualism and the Consequences for Plant Communities , 1991 .

[21]  J. Nichols,et al.  Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments , 1992 .

[22]  W. Fjellstad The landscape ecology of butterflies in traditionally managed Norwegian farmland , 1998 .

[23]  James A. Cox,et al.  Consequences and Costs of Conservation Corridors , 1987 .

[24]  Angela Lee,et al.  Perspectives on … Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc , 1997 .

[25]  M. Morris,et al.  Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation , 1993 .

[26]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[27]  L. De Meester,et al.  Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton populations in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modelling of the effective geographical distance , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[28]  H. Vermeulen Corridor function of a road verge for dispersal of stenotopic heathland ground beetles carabidae. , 1994 .

[29]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  Open Corridors Appear to Facilitate Dispersal by Ringlet Butterflies (Aphantopus hyperantus) between Woodland Clearings , 1996 .

[30]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival , 1998 .

[31]  O. Kindvall Dispersal in a metapopulation of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) , 1999 .

[32]  J. Roland,et al.  ALPINE PARNASSIUS BUTTERFLY DISPERSAL: EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE AND POPULATION SIZE , 2000 .

[33]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Study of spatial components of forest cover using partial Mantel tests and path analysis , 1992 .

[34]  S. L. Lima,et al.  SEARCH STRATEGIES FOR LANDSCAPE‐LEVEL INTERPATCH MOVEMENTS , 1999 .

[35]  Paul Beier,et al.  Determining Minimum Habitat Areas and Habitat Corridors for Cougars , 1993 .

[36]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  An experimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Melitaea cinxia , 1996 .

[37]  D. Howard,et al.  Species Dispersal In Agricultural Habitats , 1992 .

[38]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[39]  L. Erikstad,et al.  A Landscape Ecological Approach to Coastal Zone Applications , 2002 .

[40]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[41]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments , 1993 .

[42]  Françoise Burel,et al.  The role of spatio-temporal patch connectivity at the landscape level: an example in a bird distribution , 1997 .