Birds – same thing, but different? Convergent evolution in the avian and mammalian auditory systems provides informative comparative models

Birds have been and continue to be enlightening, comparative models in auditory research. This review highlights their particular appeal as a vertebrate group that evolved independently a similar division of labour to that seen in the mammalian cochlea, between classic sensory hair cells and hair cells specialising in amplification. Through studying both the similarities and differences between the avian and mammalian inner ear, profound insights into the principles of operation of such a divided system may be gained. For example, the prevailing model of the relationship between basilar-membrane displacement and afferent rate-level functions in mammals is reinforced by characteristic differences observed in birds, which correlate with known differences in basilar-papilla mechanics. Furthermore, birds arguably represent the most extreme case of hair cells using bundle motility for mechanical amplification at high frequencies, up to about 10 kHz. They should thus be informative for elucidating the operation and possibly the limitations of this ancestral amplifying mechanism at high frequencies.

[1]  General pattern and morphological specializations of the avian cochlea. , 1994 .

[2]  M. Liberman,et al.  Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D. Robertson CENTRIFUGAL CONTROL IN MAMMALIAN HEARING , 2009, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[4]  Robert L. Carroll,et al.  Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution , 1988 .

[5]  Anthony W. Gummer,et al.  Basilar membrane motion in the pigeon measured with the Mössbauer technique , 1987, Hearing Research.

[6]  N. Wegner A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of a Sensory Epithelium in the Inner Ear of a Fish (Colisa labiosa; Anabantidae) , 1982 .

[7]  O. Gleich Auditory primary afferents in the starling: Correlation of function and morphology , 1989, Hearing Research.

[8]  Mechanics of the basilar membrane in Caiman crocodilus , 1985, Hearing Research.

[9]  Christine Köppl,et al.  Phylogenetic development of the cochlea and its innervation , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  Geoffrey A. Manley,et al.  The Hearing Organ of Birds and Crocodilia , 2000 .

[11]  Ian M. Winter,et al.  Diversity of characteristic frequency rate-intensity functions in guinea pig auditory nerve fibres , 1990, Hearing Research.

[12]  Raimond L. Winslow,et al.  A computational model for rate-level functions from cat auditory-nerve fibers , 1989, Hearing Research.

[13]  G. Manley,et al.  Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in nonmammals. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  J. Clack,et al.  The Evolution of Single- and Multiple-Ossicle Ears in Fishes and Tetrapods , 2004 .

[15]  Nigel P. Cooper,et al.  Traveling Waves, Second Filters, and Physiological Vulnerability: A Short History of the Discovery of Active Processes in Hearing , 2008 .

[16]  K. Iwasa,et al.  Big and Powerful:. a Model of the Contribution of Bundle Motility to Mechanical Amplification in Hair Cells of the Bird Basilar Papilla , 2009 .

[17]  K. Iwasa,et al.  Effectiveness of hair bundle motility as the cochlear amplifier. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[18]  G. Manley,et al.  An Outline of the Evolution of Vertebrate Hearing Organs , 2004 .

[19]  P. Dallos Cochlear amplification, outer hair cells and prestin , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  Pascal Martin,et al.  Active Hair-Bundle Motility of the Hair Cells of Vestibular and Auditory Organs , 2008 .

[21]  Peter Dallos,et al.  Overview: Cochlear Neurobiology , 1996 .

[22]  A. Egner,et al.  Hair cell synaptic ribbons are essential for synchronous auditory signalling , 2005, Nature.

[23]  Yehoash Raphael,et al.  Structure and innervation of the cochlea , 2003, Brain Research Bulletin.

[24]  T. Parsons,et al.  Structure and Function of the Hair Cell Ribbon Synapse , 2006, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[25]  J. Clack,et al.  The evolution of tetrapod ears and the fossil record. , 1997, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[26]  Bernd Fritzsch Inner ear of the coelacanth fish Latimeria has tetrapod affinities , 1987, Nature.

[27]  G. Manley,et al.  Low density of membrane particles in auditory hair cells of lizards and birds suggests an absence of somatic motility , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[28]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Rate-intensity functions in the emu auditory nerve. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Chandler Light and electron microscopic studies of the basilar papilla in the duck, Anas platyrhynchos. I. The hatchling , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[30]  Donald Robertson,et al.  Shapes of rate-versus-level functions of primary auditory nerve fibres: Test of the basilar membrane mechanical hypothesis , 1991, Hearing Research.

[31]  K. Beisel,et al.  Chick hair cells do not exhibit voltage‐dependent somatic motility , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  G. Manley An evolutionary perspective on middle ears , 2010, Hearing Research.

[33]  I. Russell,et al.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms in the Efferent Control of Cochlear Nonlinearities , 2008 .

[34]  A. Popper,et al.  Variations in receptor cell innervation in the saccule of a teleost fish ear , 1990, Hearing Research.

[35]  R. Klinke,et al.  Rate-intensity-functions of pigeon auditory primary afferents , 1995, Hearing Research.

[36]  Norma B. Slepecky,et al.  Structure of the Mammalian Cochlea , 1996 .

[37]  The Basilar Membrane Nonlinear Input-Output Function , 1990 .

[38]  Jean W. T. Smolders,et al.  A functional map of the pigeon basilar papilla: correlation of the properties of single auditory nerve fibres and their peripheral origin , 1995, Hearing Research.

[39]  E. Wever The Evolution of Vertebrate Hearing , 1974 .

[40]  C. Köppl,et al.  Coding of Sound Pressure Level in the Barn Owl's Auditory Nerve , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  P. Fuchs,et al.  Release Sites and Calcium Channels in Hair Cells of the Chick’s Cochlea , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  G. Manley,et al.  Functional differentiation of sensory cells in the avian auditory periphery , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[43]  Christine Köppl,et al.  Spontaneous activity of auditory nerve fibers in the barn owl (Tyto alba): analyses of interspike interval distributions. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  M. Liberman,et al.  Afferent and efferent innervation of the cat cochlea: Quantitative analysis with light and electron microscopy , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[45]  Coding of sound intensity in the chick cochlear nerve. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  G. K. Yates,et al.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions , 1990, Hearing Research.

[47]  A. Hudspeth Making an Effort to Listen: Mechanical Amplification in the Ear , 2008, Neuron.

[48]  R. Fay,et al.  Auditory and Vestibular Efferents , 2011 .

[49]  G. Manley,et al.  Influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on distortion-product and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the barn owl , 1999, Hearing Research.

[50]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[51]  J. Wittig,et al.  Synaptic ribbon enables temporal precision of hair cell afferent synapse by increasing the number of readily releasable vesicles: a modeling study. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  C. Köppl Evolution of the Octavolateral Efferent System , 2011 .