A Uniform Type Ia Supernova Distance Ladder with the Zwicky Transient Facility: Absolute Calibration Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch Method

The current Cepheid-calibrated distance ladder measurement of H 0 is reported to be in tension with the values inferred from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), assuming standard cosmology. However, some tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) estimates report H 0 in better agreement with the CMB. Hence, it is critical to reduce systematic uncertainties in local measurements to understand the Hubble tension. In this paper, we propose a uniform distance ladder between the second and third rungs, combining Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) observed by the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) with a TRGB calibration of their absolute luminosity. A large, volume-limited sample of both calibrator and Hubble flow SNe Ia from the same survey minimizes two of the largest sources of systematics: host-galaxy bias and nonuniform photometric calibration. We present results from a pilot study using the existing TRGB distance to the host galaxy of ZTF SN Ia SN 2021rhu (aka ZTF21abiuvdk) in NGC7814. Combining the ZTF calibrator with a volume-limited sample from the first data release of ZTF Hubble flow SNe Ia, we infer H 0 = 76.94 ± 6.4 km s−1 Mpc−1, an 8.3% measurement. The error budget is dominated by the single object calibrating the SN Ia luminosity in this pilot study. However, the ZTF sample includes already five other SNe Ia within ∼20 Mpc for which TRGB distances can be obtained with the Hubble Space Telescope. Finally, we present the prospects of building this distance ladder out to 80 Mpc with James Webb Space Telescope observations of more than 100 ZTF SNe Ia.

[1]  R. Beaton,et al.  Distances to Local Group Galaxies via Population II, Stellar Distance Indicators. II. The Fornax Dwarf Spheroidal , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  J. Neill,et al.  New Modules for the SEDMachine to Remove Contaminations from Cosmic Rays and Non-target Light: byecr and contsep , 2022, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[3]  David O. Jones,et al.  A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[4]  A. Goobar,et al.  Sensitivity of the Hubble Constant Determination to Cepheid Calibration , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[5]  M. Graham,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility Type Ia supernova survey: first data release and results , 2021, 2110.07256.

[6]  W. Freedman Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[7]  A. Riess,et al.  SALT3: An Improved Type Ia Supernova Model for Measuring Cosmic Distances , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[8]  David O. Jones,et al.  Testing the consistency of dust laws in SN Ia host galaxies: A BayeSN Examination of Foundation DR1 , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[9]  P. Milne,et al.  The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.

[10]  R. Beaton,et al.  The Carnegie–Chicago Hubble Program. IX. Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch Method in the Megamaser Host Galaxy, NGC 4258 (M106) , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[11]  E. Gerlach,et al.  Gaia Early Data Release 3-Parallax bias versus magnitude, colour, and position , 2021 .

[12]  P. J. Richards,et al.  Gaia Early Data Release 3: Summary of the contents and survey properties , 2020, 2012.01533.

[13]  R. Kudritzki,et al.  A Distance Determination to the Small Magellanic Cloud with an Accuracy of Better than Two Percent Based on Late-type Eclipsing Binary Stars , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[14]  Adam A. Miller,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. II. A Public Statistical Sample for Exploring Supernova Demographics , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[15]  M. Kahan Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions XI , 2020 .

[16]  G. Narayan,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayesian SED Model for Type Ia Supernovae in the Optical to Near-Infrared , 2020, 2008.07538.

[17]  D. Brout,et al.  It’s Dust: Solving the Mysteries of the Intrinsic Scatter and Host-galaxy Dependence of Standardized Type Ia Supernova Brightnesses , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[18]  A. Mahabal,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. I. Spectroscopic Classification and the Redshift Completeness of Local Galaxy Catalogs , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[19]  C. Tao,et al.  Strong dependence of Type Ia supernova standardization on the local specific star formation rate , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[20]  R. B. Barreiro,et al.  Planck 2018 results , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[21]  A. Riess,et al.  An Improved Distance to NGC 4258 and Its Implications for the Hubble Constant , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[22]  R. Beaton,et al.  The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[23]  B. Pilecki,et al.  A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent , 2019, Nature.

[24]  C. Fremling,et al.  Fully automated integral field spectrograph pipeline for the SEDMachine: pysedm , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[25]  Umaa Rebbapragada,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[26]  R. Itoh,et al.  The GROWTH Marshal: A Dynamic Science Portal for Time-domain Astronomy , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[27]  David O. Jones,et al.  The Foundation Supernova Survey: Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Supernovae from a Single Telescope , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[28]  N. E. Sommer,et al.  First cosmological results using Type Ia supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: measurement of the Hubble constant , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[29]  Umaa Rebbapragada,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[30]  Umaa Rebbapragada,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[31]  S. E. Persson,et al.  The Carnegie Supernova Project: Absolute Calibration and the Hubble Constant , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[32]  C. A. Oxborrow,et al.  Planck2018 results , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[33]  David O. Jones,et al.  Should Type Ia Supernova Distances Be Corrected for Their Local Environments? , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[34]  Richard Walters,et al.  The SED Machine: A Robotic Spectrograph for Fast Transient Classification , 2017, 1710.02917.

[35]  Wendy L. Freedman,et al.  The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. II. The Distance to IC 1613: The Tip of the Red Giant Branch and RR Lyrae Period–luminosity Relations , 2017, 1703.06468.

[36]  Tom Barclay,et al.  SNCosmo: Python library for supernova cosmology , 2016 .

[37]  E. O. Ofek,et al.  Strong near-infrared carbon in the Type Ia supernova iPTF13ebh , 2015, 1503.02293.

[38]  Iain A. Steele,et al.  SPRAT: Spectrograph for the Rapid Acquisition of Transients , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[39]  Christopher Bebek,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility: Observing System , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[40]  M. Hudson,et al.  Cosmological parameters from the comparison of peculiar velocities with predictions from the 2M++ density field , 2014, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.

[41]  A. Merloni,et al.  X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue , 2014, 1402.0004.

[42]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples , 2014, 1401.4064.

[43]  John E. Krist,et al.  20 years of Hubble Space Telescope optical modeling using Tiny Tim , 2011 .

[44]  J. Bailin,et al.  THE GHOSTS SURVEY. I. HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEYS DATA , 2011 .

[45]  M. Sullivan,et al.  The Supernova Legacy Survey 3-year sample: Type Ia supernovae photometric distances and cosmological constraints , , 2010, 1010.4743.

[46]  Michael Wegner,et al.  Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , 2010 .

[47]  F. Feroz,et al.  MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics , 2008, 0809.3437.

[48]  M. Sullivan,et al.  SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of type Ia supernovae as distance indicators , 2007, astro-ph/0701828.

[49]  Gustavo A. Medrano-Cerda,et al.  The Liverpool Telescope: performance and first results , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[50]  Andrew E. Dolphin,et al.  WFPC2 Stellar Photometry with HSTphot , 2000, astro-ph/0006217.

[51]  L. Ho,et al.  The subluminous spectroscopically peculiar type Ia supernova 1991bg in the elliptical galaxy NGC 4374 , 1992 .

[52]  J. Mathis,et al.  The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction , 1989 .