A Uniform Type Ia Supernova Distance Ladder with the Zwicky Transient Facility: Absolute Calibration Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch Method
暂无分享,去创建一个
M. Graham | J. Neill | K. Maguire | J. Sollerman | I. Andreoni | M. Coughlin | Mathew Smith | S. Kulkarni | E. Bellm | B. Madore | A. Goobar | M. Rigault | R. Dekany | R. Laher | S. Dhawan | J. Johansson | R. Riddle | B. Rusholme | W. Freedman | G. Nir | I. Jang | L. Harvey | Young-Lo Kim | M. Medford | S. Kulkarni
[1] R. Beaton,et al. Distances to Local Group Galaxies via Population II, Stellar Distance Indicators. II. The Fornax Dwarf Spheroidal , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal.
[2] J. Neill,et al. New Modules for the SEDMachine to Remove Contaminations from Cosmic Rays and Non-target Light: byecr and contsep , 2022, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[3] David O. Jones,et al. A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
[4] A. Goobar,et al. Sensitivity of the Hubble Constant Determination to Cepheid Calibration , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.
[5] M. Graham,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility Type Ia supernova survey: first data release and results , 2021, 2110.07256.
[6] W. Freedman. Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.
[7] A. Riess,et al. SALT3: An Improved Type Ia Supernova Model for Measuring Cosmic Distances , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.
[8] David O. Jones,et al. Testing the consistency of dust laws in SN Ia host galaxies: A BayeSN Examination of Foundation DR1 , 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[9] P. Milne,et al. The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal.
[10] R. Beaton,et al. The Carnegie–Chicago Hubble Program. IX. Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch Method in the Megamaser Host Galaxy, NGC 4258 (M106) , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[11] E. Gerlach,et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3-Parallax bias versus magnitude, colour, and position , 2021 .
[12] P. J. Richards,et al. Gaia Early Data Release 3: Summary of the contents and survey properties , 2020, 2012.01533.
[13] R. Kudritzki,et al. A Distance Determination to the Small Magellanic Cloud with an Accuracy of Better than Two Percent Based on Late-type Eclipsing Binary Stars , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[14] Adam A. Miller,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. II. A Public Statistical Sample for Exploring Supernova Demographics , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[15] M. Kahan. Optical Modeling and Performance Predictions XI , 2020 .
[16] G. Narayan,et al. A Hierarchical Bayesian SED Model for Type Ia Supernovae in the Optical to Near-Infrared , 2020, 2008.07538.
[17] D. Brout,et al. It’s Dust: Solving the Mysteries of the Intrinsic Scatter and Host-galaxy Dependence of Standardized Type Ia Supernova Brightnesses , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[18] A. Mahabal,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility Bright Transient Survey. I. Spectroscopic Classification and the Redshift Completeness of Local Galaxy Catalogs , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[19] C. Tao,et al. Strong dependence of Type Ia supernova standardization on the local specific star formation rate , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[20] R. B. Barreiro,et al. Planck 2018 results , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[21] A. Riess,et al. An Improved Distance to NGC 4258 and Its Implications for the Hubble Constant , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[22] R. Beaton,et al. The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[23] B. Pilecki,et al. A distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud that is precise to one per cent , 2019, Nature.
[24] C. Fremling,et al. Fully automated integral field spectrograph pipeline for the SEDMachine: pysedm , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[25] Umaa Rebbapragada,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[26] R. Itoh,et al. The GROWTH Marshal: A Dynamic Science Portal for Time-domain Astronomy , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[27] David O. Jones,et al. The Foundation Supernova Survey: Measuring Cosmological Parameters with Supernovae from a Single Telescope , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[28] N. E. Sommer,et al. First cosmological results using Type Ia supernovae from the Dark Energy Survey: measurement of the Hubble constant , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[29] Umaa Rebbapragada,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[30] Umaa Rebbapragada,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[31] S. E. Persson,et al. The Carnegie Supernova Project: Absolute Calibration and the Hubble Constant , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[32] C. A. Oxborrow,et al. Planck2018 results , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[33] David O. Jones,et al. Should Type Ia Supernova Distances Be Corrected for Their Local Environments? , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[34] Richard Walters,et al. The SED Machine: A Robotic Spectrograph for Fast Transient Classification , 2017, 1710.02917.
[35] Wendy L. Freedman,et al. The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. II. The Distance to IC 1613: The Tip of the Red Giant Branch and RR Lyrae Period–luminosity Relations , 2017, 1703.06468.
[36] Tom Barclay,et al. SNCosmo: Python library for supernova cosmology , 2016 .
[37] E. O. Ofek,et al. Strong near-infrared carbon in the Type Ia supernova iPTF13ebh , 2015, 1503.02293.
[38] Iain A. Steele,et al. SPRAT: Spectrograph for the Rapid Acquisition of Transients , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.
[39] Christopher Bebek,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: Observing System , 2014, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.
[40] M. Hudson,et al. Cosmological parameters from the comparison of peculiar velocities with predictions from the 2M++ density field , 2014, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.
[41] A. Merloni,et al. X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue , 2014, 1402.0004.
[42] M. Sullivan,et al. Improved cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the SDSS-II and SNLS supernova samples , 2014, 1401.4064.
[43] John E. Krist,et al. 20 years of Hubble Space Telescope optical modeling using Tiny Tim , 2011 .
[44] J. Bailin,et al. THE GHOSTS SURVEY. I. HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEYS DATA , 2011 .
[45] M. Sullivan,et al. The Supernova Legacy Survey 3-year sample: Type Ia supernovae photometric distances and cosmological constraints , , 2010, 1010.4743.
[46] Michael Wegner,et al. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III , 2010 .
[47] F. Feroz,et al. MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics , 2008, 0809.3437.
[48] M. Sullivan,et al. SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of type Ia supernovae as distance indicators , 2007, astro-ph/0701828.
[49] Gustavo A. Medrano-Cerda,et al. The Liverpool Telescope: performance and first results , 2004, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.
[50] Andrew E. Dolphin,et al. WFPC2 Stellar Photometry with HSTphot , 2000, astro-ph/0006217.
[51] L. Ho,et al. The subluminous spectroscopically peculiar type Ia supernova 1991bg in the elliptical galaxy NGC 4374 , 1992 .
[52] J. Mathis,et al. The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction , 1989 .