Interactive ramp merging planning in autonomous driving: Multi-merging leading PGM (MML-PGM)

Cooperative driving behavior is essential for driving in traffic, especially for ramp merging, lane changing or navigating intersections. Autonomous vehicles should also manage these situations by behaving cooperatively and naturally. The challenge of cooperative driving is estimating other vehicles' intentions. In this paper, we present a novel method to estimate other human-driven vehicles' intentions with the aim of achieving a natural and amenable cooperative driving behavior, without using wireless communication. The new approach allows the autonomous vehicle to cooperate with multiple observable merging vehicles on the ramp with a leading vehicle ahead of the autonomous vehicle in the same lane. To avoid calculating trajectories, simplify computation, and take advantage of mature Level-3 components, the new method reacts to merging cars by determining a following target for an off-the-shelf distance keeping module (ACC) which governs speed control of the autonomous vehicle. We train and evaluate the proposed model using real traffic data. Results show that the new approach has a lower collision rate than previous methods and generates more human driver-like behaviors in terms of trajectory similarity and time-to-collision to leading vehicles.

[1]  John M. Dolan,et al.  Autonomous vehicle social behavior for highway entrance ramp management , 2013, 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[2]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Tactical cooperative planning for autonomous highway driving using Monte-Carlo Tree Search , 2016, 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[3]  John M. Dolan,et al.  A behavioral planning framework for autonomous driving , 2014, 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings.

[4]  John M. Dolan,et al.  Intention estimation for ramp merging control in autonomous driving , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[5]  John M. Dolan,et al.  A point-based MDP for robust single-lane autonomous driving behavior under uncertainties , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  Jonas Sjöberg,et al.  Strategic decision making for automated driving on two-lane, one way roads using model predictive control , 2013, 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[7]  William Whittaker,et al.  Autonomous driving in urban environments: Boss and the Urban Challenge , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[8]  Klaus-Dieter Kuhnert,et al.  When will it change the lane? A probabilistic regression approach for rarely occurring events , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[9]  Dan C. Marinescu,et al.  On-ramp traffic merging using cooperative intelligent vehicles: A slot-based approach , 2012, 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  William Whittaker,et al.  Autonomous driving in urban environments: Boss and the Urban Challenge , 2008, J. Field Robotics.

[11]  Mykel J. Kochenderfer,et al.  Imitating driver behavior with generative adversarial networks , 2017, 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[12]  Jarrod M. Snider.  Automatic Steering Methods for Autonomous Automobile Path Tracking , 2009 .

[13]  Edwin Olson,et al.  Multipolicy decision-making for autonomous driving via changepoint-based behavior prediction: Theory and experiment , 2015, Autonomous Robots.

[14]  Nicholas J. Garber,et al.  Traffic and Highway Engineering , 1988 .

[15]  Jonas Fredriksson,et al.  Longitudinal and Lateral Control for Automated Yielding Maneuvers , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[16]  Peter Hidas,et al.  Modelling vehicle interactions in microscopic simulation of merging and weaving , 2005 .