Cycling ‘subjects’ in ongoing-formation: The politics of interviews and interview analysis

This article offers a poststructuralist analytic strategy that highlights the political nature of interview analysis. Interviews pose a particular challenge for poststructuralist researchers given a widespread view that they are a method for accessing the ‘truth’. We develop a strategy that bypasses this difficulty by analysing precisely ‘what is said’ in interviews. In our analysis, discourse refers to knowledge, not language. With this understanding, we argue that focusing on exactly ‘what is said’ provides an entry point into the knowledges that make it possible for something to be said and into the eruption of new possibilities. This focus displaces assumptions about an ‘interior’ self who constructs versions of the world, with a concern for the strategic relations – the politics – within which objects and subject positions are produced. The paper draws on interviews conducted during a study into women cycling to demonstrate our poststructuralist analytic strategy.

[1]  M. Brady.  Researching governmentalities through ethnography: the case of Australian welfare reforms and programs for single parents , 2011 .

[2]  Timothy Schroeder.  Desire and Pleasure , 2010 .

[3]  N. Rose,et al.  Governing the present: administering economic, social and personal life , 2008 .

[4]  G. Gutting.  The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[5]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Strategy and strategizing: A poststructuralist perspective , 2010 .

[6]  Russell Greig.  Limitations on the use of the term 'cyclist' to describe people who ride bicycles: technical note , 2010 .

[7]  E. S. St. Pierre,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis After Coding , 2014 .

[8]  Simon Kingham,et al.  Employer travel plans, cycling and gender: will travel plan measures improve the outlook for cycling to work in the UK? , 2003 .

[9]  C. Bacchi,et al.  Poststructural interview analysis: Politicizing "personhood" , 2016 .

[10]  Wendy Bastalich.  Reading Foucault: Genealogy and Social Science Research Methodology and Ethics , 2009 .

[11]  Jan Garrard,et al.  Cycling down under: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies in Sydney and Melbourne , 2011 .

[12]  Alison L Jones.  Teaching Post-Structuralist Feminist Theory in Education: Student Resistances. , 1997 .

[13]  A. Mol.  The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice , 2003 .

[14]  Patricia Ticineto Clough,et al.  The Affective Turn , 2008 .

[15]  Ian Hacking,et al.  Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: between discourse in the abstract and face-to-face interaction , 2004 .

[16]  W. Pillow.  Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research , 2003 .

[17]  Anne Wilson,et al.  Chapter 3 Women Cycling Through the Life Course: An Australian Case Study , 2012 .

[18]  P. Stenner,et al.  Foucault, sustainable tourism, and relationships with the environment (human and nonhuman) , 2015 .

[19]  Karolina Doughty,et al.  Discourses of Mobility: Institutions, Everyday Lives and Embodiment , 2016 .

[20]  J. Clifton.  A Discursive Approach to Leadership , 2012 .

[21]  Chrissie Gibson,et al.  Counter-geographies: the campaign against rationalisation of agricultural research stations in New South Wales, Australia , 2008 .

[22]  Beate Söntgen.  Gender in Trouble , 2001 .

[23]  Herman Nilson.  Aesthetics of Existence , 1998 .

[24]  M. Foucault.  The Subject and Power , 1982, Critical Inquiry.

[25]  J. H. Frey,et al.  The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement. , 2005 .

[26]  Chris Weedon.  Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory , 1987 .

[27]  N. Mauthner,et al.  What can be known and how? Narrated subjects and the Listening Guide , 2008 .

[28]  C. Bacchi,et al.  Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications , 2014 .

[29]  Elisabeth Prügl.  Diversity Management and Gender Mainstreaming as Technologies of Government , 2011, Politics & Gender.

[30]  D. Nicholls,et al.  Foucault, the subject and the research interview: a critique of methods. , 2013, Nursing inquiry.

[31]  K. Krizek,et al.  Gender Differences in Bicycling Behavior and Facility Preferences , 2005 .

[32]  Gender and cycling: Gendering cycling subjects and forming bikes, practices and spaces as gendered objects , 2015 .

[33]  C. Bacchi.  Why Study Problematizations? Making Politics Visible , 2012 .

[34]  A. Mol.  Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions , 1999 .

[35]  Emmanuel Josserand,et al.  A Nietzschean reading of Foucauldian thinking: constructing a project of the self within an ontology of becoming , 2011 .

[36]  D. Holmes,et al.  Reflexivity, critical qualitative research and emancipation: a Foucauldian perspective. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[37]  Luna Dolezal.  Self‐Transformations: Foucault, Ethics and Normalized Bodies , 2009 .

[38]  Alecia Youngblood Jackson,et al.  Complicating Voice in a Refusal to “Let Participants Speak for Themselves” , 2012 .

[39]  M. Foucault.  The History of Sexuality , 1976 .